Well if I'm so wrong what're your predictions?

Based upon what are we supposed to predict if neither the templates nor the lineups are decided? :p

@alexclusive Pick on memes.

Based upon what are we supposed to predict if neither the templates nor the lineups are decided? :p

Obviously you predict those first and then predict the rankings.

Division A
1. Apps
2. Apps
3. Apps
4. Blitz
5. FCC
6. Sninja
7. WG, Outlaws, GG

B.
1. FCC
2. FCC
3. HAWKS
4. VIW
5. Stats
6. MH
7. CORP, 101st, Lynx

Well if I'm so wrong what're your predictions?



As for the other clans idk. I'd have to look at the lineups and then study the ladder games of the players in order to understand their playing strength.

For example I don't know whether you are playing. However I just looked over the last 2 of your ladder losses:
https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?GameID=19800969
You lost because turn 4 you got the move order wrong, else you would have won. The problem however is that 101st has a ton of players and you would only need about 5 great guys in order to stomp the A division.

division A

1. Blitz - although they only finished 3rd in division C, we know well it's all because of Ethics Panel's scheming (for example, booting Master Turtle in his games), and the actual result is "slightly" different and in the upcoming season Blitz shall actually be in division A.
2. GG - because they are good gamers and all earned their trophies
3. - 5. whoever
6. Apprentice - pretty strong team, but I believe they will be brought down by having Cowboy and Min34 in their roster.
7. Lynx - because I always predict Lynx as 7th and I was always right.

division B

1. FCC
2. FCC - they are so good that they will actually win all games and clinch both promotion spots.
3. Hawks - fresh off winning division C, they will be a very competitive team thanks to having Viking1007 on the roster. Unfortunately they will lose to FCC because you can only have Viking on so many slots without breaking the rules.
4. WG - they stay competitive, just not as strong as they used to 8 seasons ago.
5. M'Hunters - they won't hunt any more monkeys this season.
6. 101st
7. 101st - my prediction is that some big scandal will blow up that will make 101st relegate twice.

division C

1. Polish Eagles
2. - 7. some clans

"pretty strong team, but I believe they will be brought down by having Cowboy and Min34 in their roster."

As clan league dictator I can rig the league, and with min on the ethics panel I won't get punished. How is it bad we're on their team. We have all the power.

Btw, Polish Eagles will be in D, not C

For my actual predictions.

1. SNinja
2. ONE!
3. Lynx
4. Apprentice
5. Outlaws
6. WG
7. GG

1. FCC
2. Stats
3. HAWKS
4. 101st
5. MH
6. CORP
7. ViW

As clan league dictator I can rig the league, and with min on the ethics panel I won't get punished. How is it bad we're on their team. We have all the power.

Good point I'll need to change that prediction then.

Btw, Polish Eagles will be in D, not C

It's not the only "misplaced" clan in my post :P

Edited 11/8/2019 18:26:07

As the meme goes: Cancel all my meetings! Someone is wrong on the internet.

Because it is THE AWESOME OTTERYCAT's predictions, I think it is Cheaters' League's predictions Norman. Calm down.

Because it is THE AWESOME OTTERYCAT's predictions, I think it is Cheaters' League's predictions Norman. Calm down.

So basically, if M'Hunters does indeed lose it's because we got cheated out of our victories? I can live with that explanation.

Something like that. (;


Truthfully though I'm unsure about MH, I will most likely move them up depending on roster/lineup. (Depends on who plays)


P.S. bringing up a bunch of ladder games that I diddnt really care about doesn't really improve any arguments you may be trying to push

Edited 11/8/2019 22:34:06

3. Hawks - fresh off winning division C, they will be a very competitive team thanks to having Viking1007 on the roster. Unfortunately they will lose to FCC because you can only have Viking on so many slots without breaking the rules.

Are you insulting me? ;P

Do you want to play a game, zażółć gęślą jaźń, to see who is the better player? :O

Where do you even know me from?

"You have never played a game with this player."

@Norman relax dude. Its predictions, not trashtalk. Ottery put qualifiers into his post and you still ripping at him with other irrelevant things. At least save it for the actual division chat/forum rumble.

@Viking probably got a feel for ya, off of forum posts. And having a bit of fun :D

I don't have anything against any clans here. Predictions on clans I barely know:

Div A:
1) outlaws - I may be flying without my flag on the 1v1 ladder, but I am legally required to place Outlaws first. Otherwise I will be haunted by Platinum for all of eternity, and I don't want him to fly all the way up to Canada. Halp. D:
2) lynx - They got this.
3) sninja - The ninjas burst out last Clan League for a surprise attack. Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. A bit less of a surprise now. :P
4) one - I feel that they're consistently very good, but not necessarily enough of the highest tier. I wouldn't mind being wrong. :)
5) gg - I don't know these clans that well. My impression is that Apps is more active than WG but still lower average quality than GG.
6) apps - " "
7) wg - " "


Div B:
1) mh - It was sorely tempting to put MH at the bottom to tease Norman, but I want to protect the sanctity of my inbox. Also, there are some chaps there I enjoyed playing with years ago; that outweighs Norman's aggressive defensiveness. MHunters wins this if they focus their upper tier of players, but RL always happens. Or other games/hobbies, if they are like me.
2) stats - Its a quality/focus vs quantity thing at some points. I could see them as low as 4-5th but I think thats unlikely post-relegation. I'd be mostly worried whether they overwork themselves trying to play everything. They should do well if activity is decent.
3) hawks - Honestly, 3/4/5 is kinda hard to judge imo. FCC should have enough good players to pull out a 3rd, but Hawks and VIW have had a surge and seem to be laser focused in their upper echelons. I was quite pleasantly surprised to see them doing well last season. Keep it up guys!
4) viw " "
5) fcc " "
6) 101st - Doesn't Lynx take some of the stronger players on occasion?
7) corp - I'm not set on this 6/7. The last few times I've watched corp, they've held themselves higher than others have, and partially lived up to the expectations. AFAIK they tend to have some players who perform vastly better than expected, and others who are just not motivated/active enough. So its kind of similar to VIW/FCC, except corp seem rather prone to inactive boots, and that can really hurt them. The defining factor is their reliability over several months. I think they could snag a 4-5th spot if they stay on top of things.

P.S. bringing up a bunch of ladder games that I diddnt really care about doesn't really improve any arguments you may be trying to push

Sorry, couldn't resist.

@Norman relax dude. Its predictions, not trashtalk. Ottery put qualifiers into his post and you still ripping at him with other irrelevant things. At least save it for the actual division chat/forum rumble.
...
1) mh - It was sorely tempting to put MH at the bottom to tease Norman, but I want to protect the sanctity of my inbox. Also, there are some chaps there I enjoyed playing with years ago; that outweighs Norman's aggressive defensiveness.


You sound like GreatExpanse.

finally we cought up to CORP and MH. When we started in CL7 we had already the pleasure to play in the same division.

will the result be the same... I hope not :)

@Norman Because GE didn't like you? Dunno about him - I used to play with a few MHunters long ago, and I didn't call you a troll or w/e. Think what you want; more than one Canadian plays Warlight.

I'm not going to continue this and derail the thread further.

Div A:

1) lynx
2) sninja
3) one
4) outlaws
5) apps
6) gg
7) wg



Div B:

1) stats
2) corp
3) 101st
4) viw
5) mh
6) hawks
7) fcc