@Fizzer, My mistake has been noted, if it was mine that is. I always presumed that someone else wrote the Final reasons for bans/warnings and that the Reviewers reasons was just to help the 2nd step in a reports review process. Anyway, if you see this and it was my fault, consider me contacted ;)
@Nogals, Sorry for the confusion. However your quotes are wrong (through, I don't blame you for that, since I do see how you would interpret the message that way.) Also, since you can't see the full review of reports process I have a hard time understanding how you know that the banning process is inconsistent. Unless you check someones profile everyday? And even then you wan't know if they got a warning or not. I do encourage you to ask for more transparency through.
Furthermore, since I also support more transparency and to remove any confusion, here is Nogals most recent report.
@Sharpe, "I'd volunteer to moderate as well but somehow think I'd be too ban-happy for your tastes" Based on what I have seen of you.... I can't see why you can't be a mod. You may be more ban-happy then Fizzer, but you don't ban players without oversight anyway. All bans are approved from Fizzer. So as long as you review reports, it is not too much wrong you could do.
PS. Also, Note how well this thread turned out https://www.warlight.net/Forum/156885-friendly-match-felidae-vs-lynx
Somehow, I doubt that would have happen if Nogals post was left untouched.
Edited 6/5/2016 22:25:47