@Hostile, It isn't Cosplay, its fanfiction at that point, and it would be fanfiction labeled under porongraphy.


Also just realized another thing he could've been suspended for
2. Erotic stories or descriptions of sexual acts

Edited 8/19/2015 04:50:48

I feel like you guys do things to complain sometimes :p...

"Right time for me to make a shocking claim..

If Lolicon love was a member... Would he/she get banned??? A paying member who is helping fizzer to survive... As fizzer was responding to a question about how much he makes he said "Enough to survive"

Do you really think Fizzer would ban someone who is helping him "survive" ? "

Absolutely.

Even if all about profit, when a paying customers actions deter other paying customers or deter other potential paying customers from becoming paying customers then getting rid of them is more profitable than keeping them.

I don't have any part in the running of this site, but I do admin other games, that have more players on them than warlight does. They run on a similar model where people can choose to pay but can also play for free. I ban people that choose to pay on a regular basis, and whether someone does or doesn't choose to pay is never even checked when deciding in what manner to punish them.

Really , loicon what he was saying was right , and on his sake of freedom. I think Fizzer banned him unfairly.

People have different views about the world

Freedom?
What freedom?

It's not about different views. It's about being right.

Anyone spouting about freedom of speech on the internet is a moron in desperate need of an education on the topic.

^

Hey! Hey you! You're spouting shit about how there is no freedom of speech on the Internet, and in the process you're using freedom of speech! So, you. Yes, you : Fuck you!

Hi Billy mays here with the new "fuck you", buy it on TV now! Buy now, and we'll throw in a free bonus "nobody gives a shit", normally a price of $45.99, but included in the total package for just $19.95! Better yet, we'll throw an extra "fuck you" into the package for free! Share with your friends, makes an awesome gift for the family! Order now at 555-YOU-FUCK! Prices not including shipping and handling.

Genghis straight killen em.

Not quite. + 1 for effort, reading that was hilarious.

2. Racial slurs, personal attacks, excessive profanity, or any other offensive language will not be tolerated.

how is my profile pic pornografic.

ok people so i have now gotten my answer as to why i was suspended and it turns out i broke no rules and fizzer was just to lazy to remove my suspention.

I wanted to slam my head against my desk several times while reading this thread. All you people whining about "Muh freedoms", let's point a few things out for you.

1. Total freedom equals anarchy. Rules and laws exist for a reason. And honestly, the rules being debated here do not profoundly affect you in any fashion. Stop acting abused because you can't post nudes where-ever you want on the internet. Plus, sexual role-play on the Warlight forum? Really? Really?! There's websites which are much better suited towards this sort of thing, plus you'd find better role-players on them.

2. The, "Hurr Hurr Americans are prudes," line has already gotten old a couple years ago. We haven't banned nudity, and we haven't banned porn. Everything has a proper place, however. If you were at a family re-union with children of all ages around would you let someone start hanging up sexual posters everywhere? Why is it so hard to understand that some things are better kept in private/specific areas? You don't get to do what you want, wherever you want because not everybody wants to see what you're doing.
Seriously, all the controversy going around regarding privacy and at the same time we have people advocating for sexual content to be posted more openly? What?

Good lord, one person gets suspended for trying to start a sex rp on a gaming site and people lose their minds....

Edited 8/19/2015 14:39:37

No one person gets unfairly suspended and people lose their minds.

You broke a rule, or at the very least intended to break the rules and were encouraging others to do so. That's plenty enough justification for Fizzer to suspend you.

"^

Hey! Hey you! You're spouting shit about how there is no freedom of speech on the Internet, and in the process you're using freedom of speech! So, you. Yes, you : Fuck you!"

No idiot.

Me posting on this site has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Freedom of speech deals with governments restricting peoples speech.

Fizzer is not the government, he is not jailing you if you speak out against him. He is fully 100% within his right to ban anyone for any reason however.

I have the right to create a website that promotes mos any view I wish to. Even then I have to host the site myself or else my hosting provider can remove the site if they deem it to be unsavory. I however do not have the right to promote whatever agenda I wish on other peoples sites. I have no rights on others sites.

What I have here and on any other website I frequent are privileges. Privileges unlike rights are not inherent or irrevocable.

Unfairly? You broke the rules and paid the consequences!

"No one person gets unfairly suspended"

No.

Even if you think the posts actually made weren't bad you were instigating people to break the rules. Instigation of crimes in the real world is often accompanied by jailtime equivalent to actually perpetrating the crime in question.

I can not stand outside a party store and yell, "The owners of this place's a racist, someone someone should teach him a lesson.", and then feign innocence when someone walks in and attacks him.

I was reading this, but then I saw this one post and I really want to reply to it.

And all countrys have something to hang their heads in shame for America the War on Terror(Well Bushs war on terror) the UK nearly losing Scotland Russia for Putin the list goes on and on

Scotland seceding would be a good thing, not a bad thing.

^ not for the UK, perhaps.

Yes I suppose it would embarrass England.

Scotland seceding would be a good thing, not a bad thing.

Sorry if I'm going off on a tangent, but that reminds me of something that's quite irking.

Why do most people always treat Scotland's secession attempts as a good thing, or at-least perfectly legal, but act as if it's sheer evil for any U.S state to even dare suggesting the possibility of seceding?

(This is not directly pointed at you Ox, I'm just expressing general frustration at the people in question, and they know who they are.)