20 games to get a rank. Games expire after 5 months.

I'm missing something. If the games are created from your account, why does the partaker need to have evrything unlocked?

the quantity of different templates is a big overwhelming to be able to master them all.

may i suggest some template veto functionality?

Edited 10/27/2016 16:25:26

I'm missing something. If the games are created from your account, why does the partaker need to have evrything unlocked?

Because of the way Warlight APIs work. I cannot invite someone to a game in an automated fashion when they haven't unlocked the feature as it is considered a 'hack' to overcome the feature unlocking system on WL.

the quantity of different templates is a big overwhelming to be able to master them all.

may i suggest some template veto functionality?

Already on my backlog. Hoping to get to it after resolving the rating system and fixing bugs.

Edited 10/27/2016 16:31:53

AWESOME!

@ps motd will do that soon with 3/5 templates as veto he said

Edit: motd was faster already :D

Edited 10/27/2016 16:32:27

I second ps suggestion, letting players to veto some templates would be nice

btw some templates are practice (e.g. https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=12194730), please change them to ranked

Just out of curiousity (not complaining) but is the 1v1 British Raj supposed to be played with WR or SR? I've recently played it with WR but the template on this ladder is using SR. Just curious if this was intended or not.... I like both.


Thanks for creating this, I'll enjoy playing on it.

Just a minor bug:


Apparently the UI doesnt scale correctly on smaller screens (1366 x 768)

The real question: How long before ELO problems/GAE problems kick in and it's unusable?

btw some templates are practice (e.g. https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=12194730), please change them to ranked

Changed this template to ranked. If you find any others, please let me know.

Just out of curiousity (not complaining) but is the 1v1 British Raj supposed to be played with WR or SR? I've recently played it with WR but the template on this ladder is using SR. Just curious if this was intended or not.... I like both.

It was intended to be WR. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed now.

Apparently the UI doesnt scale correctly on smaller screens (1366 x 768)

Sorry about that. As you can clearly tell, I'm not great with UI :P
I've pushed a change which improves the experience a bit. Still not perfect, but much better.

The real question: How long before ELO problems/GAE problems kick in and it's unusable?

This CLOT isn't hosted on GAE. It's hosted on a VM which I pay 35$ a month for. So it better not die.
The previous CLOT used a 3rd party library and was based on True Skill. This one is based on Elo and written by me. However, I'm not a math expert and it may well fail. I'm currently experimenting with Bayesian Elo. So we'll just wait and see I suppose.

Edited 10/28/2016 02:08:37

First post says that

Games are scheduled every 2 hours.

and on the ladder page we can read

Games are scheduled every 3 hours.

Small bug that I found: I tried to sign up on mobile. The interface looked good, but the join ladder button didn't work. I had to switch to browser mode and only then I could join.

Edited 10/28/2016 13:18:44

First post says that
Games are scheduled every 2 hours.
and on the ladder page we can read
Games are scheduled every 3 hours.

Fixed the ladder page.

Small bug that I found: I tried to sign up on mobile. The interface looked good, but the join ladder button didn't work. I had to switch to browser mode and only then I could join.

I tried to make it mobile friendly as much a possible. Try rotating the device to see if it works. Something seems to overlap the join button on the phone, and I haven't figured out why.

I tried rotating it, but that didn't work.

Something seems to overlap the join button on the phone

If you add this to your button, it should work fine everywhere.

{
    position: relative;
    z-index: 1;
}

Just out of curiousity (not complaining) but is the 1v1 British Raj supposed to be played with WR or SR? I've recently played it with WR but the template on this ladder is using SR. Just curious if this was intended or not.... I like both.


It was intended to be WR. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed now.


British Raj SR is a lot better imo.

No.

Dat Hannibal template is apparently missing some weight on priority and reinforcement cards,you can thank Njord for spotting that in our game.

@ps, you comment but did not place this ladder under Community Events?

*Hint* :P

thanks cloud strife! We fixed this already by now :)