@Mr.Legi:

Your's would be:

(81*(78/2)*(56/3))/1,000 = (81*39*19)/1000 = 60,021/1000 = 60.021 ~ 60 Nohhams

I'll determine my base worth at 5 Nohhams.

Edited 2/17/2016 12:06:30

The worth has got to take the fact you'll have them for 2 seasons and that there isn't many Nohhams their to win.

Why is there a max player count? Surely it would be better to let all the players be bought up, then managers can just choose not to run them (just like a reserve players in real life)

tojam some of us have lower win rates due to the fact we only play against good players, just take a look at me, i've calculated your way and i should be only worth about 24 Nohams which would be pretty cheap for me if most would say, maybe since i'm only playing 5 games it might be about the price i will get but that is for sure not accurate in any way

All stats are easy to alter, everyone know that...

I didn't say you had to use it, but if I were a manager, that would be my system of working out people's worth.

Also, you may end up playing players of exactly the same quality as those 'good players'.

Edited 2/17/2016 12:41:12

I'd be worth 0 nohhams because I've never won a 3v3.

Seems legit.

Seems too much, you should pay managers to take you on ^_^

Edited 2/17/2016 14:32:01

I'll just need to win my next 3v3, doing so would raise my value from 0 nohhams to 40 nohhams.

Null and Void

Edited 2/17/2016 15:58:34

I want to join.
I would play 10 games.
I prefer 2v2 or 3v3

Two of my tournaments in the "RP Clan league":

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer/Tournament?ID=16506

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer/Tournament?ID=16478

@MotD

I have a suggestion. In case you have way more players sign up than the amount needed to run the league, maybe you could add more tournaments? Instead of the "youth/academy" thing.

You stated that there'll be 4 1v1 tournaments, 2 2v2's and 1 3v3. If you have enough players, you could simply bump this up to 5 1v1's, or maybe 2 3v3's, or something like that. This would of course require that you give a higher amount of money to the managers at the start of the auction.

I apply to be manager :)

More team tournaments would be fun, but you should estimate what will be more work for you to do.

Hmm.. Said earlier I'd like to play, 10 games. But I don't see myself on the spreadsheet :/

you are currently number 27 on the right column.

Why is there a max player count? Surely it would be better to let all the players be bought up, then managers can just choose not to run them (just like a reserve players in real life)

There is no max player count. Clubs can sign as many players as they like. I would assume clubs wouldn't want to just stack up a lot of reserve players though, since players are paid salaries even if they don't play at all. It is not better to let all players be bought up. It is not fun for a large group of people to be told they are kind of in the league(when they're really not). A next group(at a lower skill level) is the best solution in my opinion. But that will be determined by the amount of time it takes to get this started. Every club is advised to have at least 1 reserve player in case of emergencies.

I have a suggestion. In case you have way more players sign up than the amount needed to run the league, maybe you could add more tournaments? Instead of the "youth/academy" thing.

Unfortunately this is not an option for Season 1. A lot of calculations have gone in to ensuring a stable economy. Adding more tournaments adds more money into the system and would require recalculations which I'd rather avoid as I have other things to take care of :)
It would also make the season longer(I really don't want a season to run for half a year!).

If a lot of managers have deemed a set of players to not be at the same skill level as the rest of the players in Group A, it makes sense to allow these players to play in a group with their own skill level so we don't have lop sided results. So I really think making a division is the best approach here. Let's discuss this offline if you still disagree.

Edited 2/17/2016 16:48:38

Best to keep it simple for the first season

The teams should be based promoted and relegated. Don't divide the division's by good players in A and mediocre players in B..... The managers should get promoted and relegated and with them their teams??

I think it's better to keep everything in 1 division, that way it's simpler, and then the league will sort itself out on it's own, top teams will go to the top. Same as in real life :)

I think you're worrying too much about "stability of the economy" I don't think you need to worry too much about that, if players want to pay 500 Nohhams for a player, then let them. If it's found later that clubs are making too much money, then you can add in regulations. Just like real life :)

Honestly, sports have existed for centuries, I think they have the best set ups as they have had plenty of time to iron out the bugs, personally I would just model the system on them :)

Edited 2/17/2016 18:01:56

If it isn't too late, I would like to join for 10 games. I am mediocre at everything, terrible at nothing

I'll join, 5 games