Also, there's no need for these challenges, if sanmu or anyone else wants to prove they are good at (real) SE then they should join the P/R league https://www.warzone.com/Forum/537328-small-earth-promotionrelegation-league-season-22

or the seasonal ladder for these SE settings.

> @Nauz
You can dislike SE; that's fine. But you agreed to an 11 game series. A forfeit is a forfeit. But if I can say one thing, my dear friend, it's that SE stresses the fundamentals and the roots of the game. I only played you for two games, but I could tell you were quite weak at them.


You're a moron. Stop trying to put words in my mouth, and stop attacking arguments I never made. Strawman arguments should not be your MO.

I never contested a forfeit was a forfeit, I very openly said you can say you won 6-0 for all I care - it doesn't matter to me as I don't give a shit about SE.

Like this is basically the scenario that just played out:

No one:
Literally, no one:
Sanmu: A forfeit's a forfeit, you can't try and claim it's a draw.
Everyone: No shit, Captain Obvious?

As for lacking basics, nonsense, if you want to try and talk shit, feel free to play me at other templates, like I initially requested.

SE does NOT stress the fundamentals, it's a template where the first player to make a mistake, or bad prediction, has typically lost. A template that stressed the fundamentals would be something with a lot more wiggle room, and where bad predictions don't end games.

The entire purpose of the "challenge" in my eyes was to prove that SE has a lower skillcap, NOT that I had reached its skillcap. If your record on it vs me was worse than my record vs you on something I actually play a lot, it would support that argument. You only being willing to play SE made the entire thing rather pointless and gave me little incentive to care about the results.

Especially without coins, I'd still rather play SE for coins than without coins. Why? Because as much as I hate SE, the coins would at least serve as an incentive for me to care.

I care about losing money, I don't care about losing SE games. When there's nothing on the line that I care about, there's little inventive to putting in effort.

Edited 6/17/2021 02:49:57

@Hades: the gameplay is very different if you toggle 1ASG, so it's functionally a whole different template than on P/R

Throw some coins on it like originally agreed upon then, I wanna see how this plays out lol

No one:
Literally, no one:
Sanmu: A forfeit's a forfeit, you can't try and claim it's a draw.
Everyone: No shit, Captain Obvious?

Cringe. Why are you trying to justify fortfeiting, just own it and move on.

SE does NOT stress the fundamentals, it's a template where the first player to make a mistake, or bad prediction, has typically lost.

Even if you do have more of a chance to come back on other templates, I don't see how this is an argument against SE stressing the basics? I would say that someone who has mastered SE will have a much easier time mastering MME (maybe we could make a followup challenge to test this theory :D), than a complete noob to the game, and therefore SE does in fact provide a solid skill foundation. This is just you clapping back with your own strawman argument and shitting on SE.

The entire purpose of the "challenge" in my eyes was to prove that SE has a lower skillcap, NOT that I had reached its skillcap.

But your whole argument is that playing Sanmu in SE will prove nothing about the template's merit, and this is why you don't care about the match? So how did you expect this challenge prove to anything when signing up?

When there's nothing on the line that I care about, there's little inventive to putting in effort.

Again, why sign up if you don't care which way the games go?

Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to me like you signed up thinking it was a win-win situation. Either you beat Sanmu and use that as evidence against SE, or you quit after a couple games and use that as evidence against SE anyway as you are doing now.

> Cringe. Why are you trying to justify fortfeiting, just own it and move on.

No one's justifying anything. He's acting like I claimed it was anything but a forfeit. I didn't.

What I'm criticizing him for doing is attacking a justification I never made or attempted to make.

Edited 6/18/2021 02:53:42

> So how did you expect this challenge prove to anything when signing up?

I didn't. He challenged to a best of 11 at SE. I requested best of 11 at SE AND another template, he refused to play the other template.

> I would say that someone who has mastered SE will have a much easier time mastering MME (maybe we could make a followup challenge to test this theory :D), than a complete noob to the game,

No one is refuting that. I am refuting that SE stresses the fundamentals more than other templates do, not that they play no part in success at SE.

A best of 11 at SE was never something I had much interest in. I didn't challenge him, I begrudgingly accepted his challenge and then decided I cba to keep playing a template I detest. It's not enjoyable, and ultimately that's what I play warzone for - enjoyment. I don't care about the stupid dick measuring. I never did. I don't challenge people to shit like best of 11's.

I didn't want to accept Phobos's challenge either, despite being pretty confident I'd win, and attempted to avoid doing so for over 6 months before finally accepting just to make people shut up about it. I simply don't care for "challenges". All they do is make a game I play as a means of killing time and having fun into something stressful and unenjoyable.

There's a reason almost all my games are real-time, they're low-stress and the results don't matter to me. As such they're a LOT more enjoyable.

I don't enjoy ANY MD format on this game - the reason I'm a notorious boot risk is because I procrastinate taking turns in MD games because I find them stressful and unenjoyable. The more pressure there is to win a game, the less fun it becomes.

Edited 6/18/2021 03:05:39

they call me Johnny Silverhand, cause I'm a sore loser

lmao

Y'all, stop bullying Nauz. He's not pretending he won; he just explained why he forfeit. No need to be a fizz to him when he's already resigned.

if this challenge proved anything its that us small earthers are a sensitive bunch, and demand respect!

Honestly, bashing the skill of a player based on their performance on ONE template is absurd to me.

Also, saying that one template "stresses the fundamentals" is equally absurd. A template stresses a player's skill on that template. Why else would the rankings in the seasonal ladder change drastically from season to season, template to template?

If your goal is to truly test your fundamentals, your better off doing something like the multi day ladder, which has over 50 templates for players to test their meddle against each other. In order to do well on a ladder with so many templates, you HAVE to know your fundamentals. A template specialist can't do squat on the ladder, e.g. nauzhror, our MME specialist, has struggled mightily when playing it:

http://md-ladder.cloudapp.net/player?playerId=6516195490
http://md-ladder.cloudapp.net/player?playerId=56114135921

All I see in this thread here are two players with big egos trying to bash each other's ability - and some players are taking it as an opportunity to bash nauz because he resigned on ONE template. shamu might be a great apple farmer, nauz a great orange farmer, but I don't see evidence that points to either one being the better fruit farmer overall. And sure, maybe shamu should try his hand at oranges, but ultimately the best way to gauge fruit farming skill would be to have them both try to cultivate cherries, mangos, grapefruit, peaches, etc. as well.

if this challenge proved anything its that us small earthers are a sensitive bunch, and demand respect!

I can respect you as an apple farmer, sure, but if you are looking to be respected as a fruit farmer in general, then I can't, since you seem fairly untested in that respect.

Edited 6/18/2021 20:53:09

Welcome back from retirement, Mr. Gourdian.

It really doesn't matter what you call it...fundamentals or not fundamentals, it doesn't matter.

Point is, you need certain skills (e.g, efficient troop management, good anticipation skills, and being acutely aware of relative advantages, for example) to do well in Small Earth. Unless you think those skills don't help in other templates, then you aren't actually disagreeing with me. You're disagreeing for some semantic reason because it offends you on some weird level.

Point is, Nauz was really bad at the more "microscopic" elements of the game. Not even just in the sense that he didn't know Small Earth specifics (e.g, what territories are higher value in Small Earth, and what objectives are more important on Small Earth?"), but also in a generalist perspective too (e.g, what can I do to have a higher relative advantage?). Sure, the more "microscopic" stuff might be less important on the larger maps, but I'd wager that the players who can do it on a larger map have a leg up. And I'd guess that's also why Nauz fails against the true "elites" of the game at a higher level.

I have no interest currently in being anything more than an "apple farmer." I'm a Small Earth player, and this was a Small Earth Series. I will continue to play Small Earth as long as it's fun for me (which will probably be some time, because I don't feel like I've mastered it yet.) What I want is to play more Small Earth matches against good Small Earth players. This no longer has anything to do with Nauz; there are several challengers and I would like to play at least one of them.

Point is, you need certain skills (e.g, efficient troop management, good anticipation skills, and being acutely aware of relative advantages, for example) to do well in Small Earth. Unless you think those skills don't help in other templates, then you aren't actually disagreeing with me. You're disagreeing for some semantic reason because it offends you on some weird level.

Point is, Nauz was really bad at the more "microscopic" elements of the game. Not even just in the sense that he didn't know Small Earth specifics (e.g, what territories are higher value in Small Earth, and what objectives are more important on Small Earth?"), but also in a generalist perspective too (e.g, what can I do to have a higher relative advantage?). Sure, the more "microscopic" stuff might be less important on the larger maps, but I'd wager that the players who can do it on a larger map have a leg up. And I'd guess that's also why Nauz fails against the true "elites" of the game at a higher level.

The little details are always important. What a top player who does well on many many templates is that the can immediately identify what those important details are about each template. They could have never seen a map or template before, never played on a map before, and they KNOW what the important details are which are critical to the outcome of the game.

Take my clanmate Octane for example. If you were to just catch him playing a game, I doubt you would ever see him playing small earth, or bothering to spend his time enshrining the small earth map/strategy/etc. He's a perennial top MDL player, http://md-ladder.cloudapp.net/player?playerId=3062174051 , a top 1v1 ladder player, https://www.warzone.com/LadderTeam?LadderTeamID=14509 , and is currently locking down 1st place on the 3v3 ladder slot by himself with his alts.

Even without much small earth playing, he can jump into the seasonal ladder on small earth and get a top 10 performance: https://www.warzone.com/LadderTeam?LadderTeamID=27233

Not because he spends his time pouring over small earth in particular, or any template for that matter, but because his overall fundamentals are strong.

You could of course, be able to replicate said performance on the small earth ladder if you spend all your time devoted to being an apple farmer. And I can respect that sort of dedication. But, spending your time finding the important microscopic details for a specific template doesn't necessarily help you internalize the overarching rules that MAKE those details important. You just know the details on said template. While admittedly that sort of detailed analysis of one template with help make you a decent player across all templates (much like I consider nauz a decent player across all templates), it won't allow you to compete against the best except on the template you specialize on (such as nauz being able to complete against top players orange farming, but he won't win the apple farming competition against you).

Welcome back from retirement, Mr. Gourdian.

I am still more or less retired. Look at how many points ive had last month. Doesn't stop me from lurking though.

Edited 6/18/2021 23:03:41

I see one big assumption in Aura's analysis of overall skill: it assumes that Small Earth skill falls under the same cluster as skill on other templates. But we don't really know that. In fact, as someone who's jumped from (being mediocre at) conventional medium-sized strategic play to (being mediocre at) Small Earth play, I'm inclined to agree with sanmu that Small Earth covers skills that can be brushed over on medium-sized templates.

With the Seasonal results, we can even somewhat validate this statistically by checking how well Small Earth results correlates with MTL performance and to see whether Small Earth rating falls into the same general cluster at the core of the MTL (see below - all MTL templates are roughly correlated with one another in terms of how well performance on one predicts performance on the others, although some clearly are more predictive than others, like Strat MME which is at the center for a reason; ignore the colors, the lines connect templates between which performance is directly highly correlated):



Small Earth keeps a lot of the features of Strat MME (0% SR, standard bonuses with chokepoints and the like), but the size might be a huge game-changer.

Wait, knyte, are you saying that Greece LD is a good predictor of skill on other templates?
Not that it surprises me, but I'll save that picture for the future

Edited 6/19/2021 08:39:41

^Yeah, can we analyze that graph a little more? I feel like there's so much meaning in it haha, and I don't understand all it's ramifications

Eh, it's not that meaningful, it basically just clusters templates where the necessary skills are similar together (that's why Randomized ME is next to ME as an example). It also does a poor job at that because it's 2D.
But I don't care, Greece LD is in the middle and I'll use that to my advantage.

Edited 6/19/2021 09:02:38