The value progression cant be related to the purchase price as some players can have been way overpriced compare to their base value. If MotD goes that route, he would use the original tiers and base prices rather than the purchase prices. But I dont think it should make a difference. A win is a win and all should have the same value, unless MotD manages to come up with a strong algorithm which takes all that into account while remaining fair at the end of the season.

I am curious how he will factor boots in. Miyagi got booted in I think 3 games for us. Those count as losses (rightfully so), but I know in 1 of them he was winning.

I wonder if he will factor that in to his price adjustment. Also, the quality of opponents could be considered. Say the 1v1 china was stacked with the best players, while another template had much worse competition.

But arent player value decided by how much they are going to be bidded for (if any) from other teams anyway ? Then there are gains per win (and losses) which are already set. Not sure MotD spoke of adjusting players values at end of season (cant remember).

Will motd have another stream so we can all join back and discuss

Motd is on the hottest place he could find atm and not able to stream. But i bet when he returns from hell he'll stream with pleasure

As an adherend of free market I think all prices should be determined by the managers.

But yeah thinking of it MotD cant be planning of modifying players value, so that overpaid players remain overpaid while still on the books. Otherwise there would be no sacrifice in securing players by overpaying them in first place.

Edited 4/20/2016 17:19:44

I thought that when a player is owned by a club, when two clubs want to make a transaction it is up to the managers for how much they sell/buy players.

I agree with Sultan

And you would both be correct:

Two clubs may negotiate on the price of a player during any trade. No trade can exceed 150% of the player's current price to ensure fairness.

Bah. If a club thinks I am as good as MoD, they should be able to sell me for the same

^+1 true

Afaik motd wants to use the price paid for a player and adjust the value of the player on a) earnings the player made (i.e. did he manage to bring in his salaries) and b) outcome of the matches (higher priced should beat lower priced)

All can be done without 150% regulation I think. :p
Though that is not a big deal.

can we post this yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04854XqcfCY

Those boots in division A are horrifying.

Update?

Spuds on 100 points. Needless to say more!

" can we post this yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04854XqcfCY "

Spuds ftw! ^^

There is a problem with this

Two clubs may negotiate on the price of a player during any trade. No trade can exceed 150% of the player's current price to ensure fairness.

It would allow players like me who are massively underpriced to keep being underpriced for a loong time.

I mean I am a top 10 (ish) ladder player, but priced at 9 (18 for 10 games).

Edited 4/25/2016 00:58:20