It's so much more enjoyable than local deployments. And yet, not one single seasonal ladder has featured multi-attack, despite there being. . . . I forget how many seasons with LD. It's underrepresented and it's about time we had a multi-attack season. Pleaz.

+1, exactly my opininon!

Edited 3/26/2015 21:15:58

The reason is local deployment was at one point a new feature and basically any new feaature (ld, no-split etc.) gets a seasonal ladder template however bad it may be. If there was to ba a multiattack template I think it'd be required that the community works on it before season. Frankly if Fizzer wanted to make a multiattack template by himself I'd be very afraid of the end result. The idea itself is good, if we were to get a green light from Fizzer on a seasonal ladder me and some folkd from template makers club would work on a MA template.

template makers club

There's a club?

easier to hustle with multi on

Edited 3/26/2015 23:39:37

There was a Multi Attackers League a while back.....

A lot of people don't like Multi-Attack because it makes deploying all your armies in one spot and stomping on your opponents a prevailingly powerful strategy. (Which is still true without Multi-Attack enabled, mind you...)

I find that, with the proper settings, though, multi-attack games are far, far more interesting than regular games. Wastelands and blockades are a good fit, as well as anything which restricts your ability to deploy. Local Deployments is one good option.

An easier and simpler solution I outline here:

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/82395-deployment-limits-easy-new-rule-implement

I've tested it in about 50 games, and it's by far my favourite way to play Warlight. Regular games are a drag in comparison.