It wasn't accidental.
Death of MMB was planned before the roles were sent out.
I was just the first to cast the vote.

What was accidental was him getting such a role.

EDIT:
Also, the death of the seer doesn't cripple us, what crippled us was that the role was given to him.
Nice trollage by Dom365, since he knew MMB would be the first to go. ;D

Edited 2014-09-20 01:08:55

Bdh, you're acting very aggressively. I understand Silver's point, but he could as easily be a wolf. But at least he had sound reasoning with his vote, you are just crying for blood... Very suspicious?

Two questions to Dom365 since they're crucial for the game.

Idiot - same as Seer, except will get a wrong result.

You meant random result right? Wrong result would imply that whatever role the idiot sees is false. Random would imply that it can be either.

*NB* The Seer can, if they wish, choose to view a role number instead of a player during the night time.

What about the idiot will he get a wrong result? Or a random? Or will that be accurate for him too?

Edited 2014-09-20 01:26:18

Rest in peace, MMB. If your IQ weren't as close to the square root of the number of people playing Wolves as it is, I would not have voted for you :/

So, we're down a seer now, for better or worse. Let's try to be a bit more careful with our next vote

Silver that makes the games no fun if you are just going to kill people based solely on past games. Why don't we just leave it be and not bring other conflicts into this.

And if I am being aggressive it is because ya'll just lynched a seer. So just because it was early it is okay to lynch seers? I don't feel like this is good. Notice how he shifted the blame to the game creator? Dom had nothing to do with you all wanting to lynch mystery. Taking no indication that you messed up seems very very suspicious.

There was no reasoning behind this kill other than past games. Don't try and ruin it.

And btw trying to move the suspicion from you to that who is calling you out is very cliche.

Edited 2014-09-20 02:20:34

And how were we supposed to know he is a seer? It's just dumb luck that he turned out to be a seer, but if he was a plainy you would somehow be ok with it?

I didn't get a chance to vote, but I would of voted MMB out also. He attracts trolls (or more likely is the troll just looking for attention), makes no sense, and just generally distracts from the game. Being a Seer would not of made him magically a better player and the loss was made when he was rolled to be the Seer already.

Voting for him is not a sign of being a Wolf. Infact, his actions AID the wolves in making a readily available scapegoat for when things get tough.

gnuff is wolf

Wow that escalated quickly, you go to sleep and miss all the MMB hate.

Which is quite old now to be honest.

"Haters gonna hate" ... hmmm coming from someone who votes MMB in every game! And tries their hardest to get everyone else to as well, in every game! Just because you don't like him? I think you're the hater and you are hating.

Poor MMB. I don't like a lot of your babbling as well, but like skunk said it's a new game and you need to view it as such. Also agree with Rento that everyone voting only for MMB shows us absolutely nothing ... except maybe in this case that jumping on a MMB hate wagon has killed our seer.

As to Arun's obsession in every game like this he plays of not killing in round one ... take your logic further Arun ... round 2 then essentially becomes round 1 and then you need to not kill anyone in round 2 because it is the 'first' round and you have no real info so you can't kill anyone in round 2 either and you are in a vicious circle, where wolves kill villagers every night and the villagers spend all day saying ... best not kill anyone ... let's wait. ... Then again you were a Wolf in the last two games so it could just be Wolf tactics.

Seers: there is 1/2 chance you are an idiot. With 1/3 seers/idiots gone and we know it's a seer, that means that the other two seers are 17% more likely to be idiots than originally.

Mystery man was an obvious first choice; I also would have voted for him if I had been on today. Skunk looks suspicious to me already, but I don't think we have enough intel yet.

Well, I'm not sure that we learned a lot from killing one of our seers...

This bdh vs. Silver thing is strange to say the least. I feel like one of them is probably a wolf, but I'm not 100% on that.

Also if we find out that bdh IS a wolf, then I think that it's likely that lawlz is also a wolf. it seems like lawlz jumped on silvers challenge too quickly although to be fair, it does seem like silver is more or less daring us to lynch (silver) him???
I have a hard time understanding what that gains him. It seems like he's (silver) either a stupid villager or the gutsiest wolf that ever lived.

I don't have a vote yet this round yet as I think I would like to hear more dialogue first, but right now these three top my suspect list. I think either silver or bdh is a wolf and if we find out that bdh is a wolf then I would say lawlz is also one. I would strongly endorse seering either silver or bdh.

Nice trollage by Dom365, since he knew MMB would be the first to go. ;D

It genuinely was what was randomly drawn, although I'll confess I laughed quite a bit when I saw it...

Idiot - same as Seer, except will get a wrong result.

You meant random result right? Wrong result would imply that whatever role the idiot sees is false. Random would imply that it can be either.

No, I mean wrong. So their information is not completely useless!

*NB* The Seer can, if they wish, choose to view a role number instead of a player during the night time.

What about the idiot will he get a wrong result? Or a random? Or will that be accurate for him too?

Idiot will get another wrong result.

Hm..

IMO, Skunk/Bdh are most suspicious. However do not discount people like Silver and Ska. Silver's attitude is completely changed here; slightly suspicious. Ska is gunning for me already with flawed logic. How can me asking the wolves not to kill tonight be bad? The next round would be like round one, except we have slightly more knowledge.

I agree with apollo, the seer was "dead" when it was given to MMB, not by us lynching him.

MMB has proven in previous games that he is unable to contribute anything of worth, even if he got a role (check Mafia from Silver, MMB was detective there and managed to be completely useless, even knowing he can't be the idiot anymore he did not tell who he investigated in the nights). In wolves 2 he was easy to influence and he voted like the wolves wanted him too, making it a real quick loss. Even bdh, who was most obvious wolf last round, survived because of MMBs stupidity. Sad we wasted a seer, but good having MMB out.

Can we stop debating the MMB thing and focus on finding the wolves now? We've established that we were justified.

It's unfortunate that we lost a seer, but would anyone of believed him. Not sure if anyone can rely on him tbh. No great loss, anyone else but him, then yes.

"Can we stop debating the MMB thing and focus on finding the wolves now? We've established that we were justified."

Yeah ok we should drop it and move onto the game.

But I take serious issue with this part of your statement:

"We've established that we were justified."

You haven't established any justification you've merely read that other people who did the same thing as you said that it was ok and took that as absolution.

What I'm seeing is that most of you just won't let the young kid play because you find him annoying or stupid. It's mean and it's bullying to be frank. How does someone learn to improve if you constantly exclude them? All MMB wanted to do was play a game with you - a game where things should start afresh every time and the only thing you keep saying is you can't, you're useless, die.

Edited 2014-09-20 09:00:33

I agree with you there Ska. However MMB is underage I believe, if he can't act mature, he should have been long gone anyway.

He doesn't play the best game sometimes - but let's try to be more constructive than hurtful towards him :)

I know I'd appreciate that if I was in his position.

Why am I suspicious? I was right in saying that we know nothing first night. Other then that I have done nothing.

But in trying to figure out in who to vote for we still do not know a lot. Maybe we should take a look at Silver, people who are constantly heavily opinionated on a vote are often wolfs (like his balls in the last game), but of course that is not a lot of evidence to go by.

But the person that is the most suspicious at the moment is JSA for voting on me with giving no reason other then suspicion. You need to give a reason why you get suspicious on someone if not you might as well be giving no reason at all. But that too is not a lot of evidence to go by.