Well, I'm not sure that we learned a lot from killing one of our seers...

This bdh vs. Silver thing is strange to say the least. I feel like one of them is probably a wolf, but I'm not 100% on that.

Also if we find out that bdh IS a wolf, then I think that it's likely that lawlz is also a wolf. it seems like lawlz jumped on silvers challenge too quickly although to be fair, it does seem like silver is more or less daring us to lynch (silver) him???
I have a hard time understanding what that gains him. It seems like he's (silver) either a stupid villager or the gutsiest wolf that ever lived.

I don't have a vote yet this round yet as I think I would like to hear more dialogue first, but right now these three top my suspect list. I think either silver or bdh is a wolf and if we find out that bdh is a wolf then I would say lawlz is also one. I would strongly endorse seering either silver or bdh.

Nice trollage by Dom365, since he knew MMB would be the first to go. ;D

It genuinely was what was randomly drawn, although I'll confess I laughed quite a bit when I saw it...

Idiot - same as Seer, except will get a wrong result.

You meant random result right? Wrong result would imply that whatever role the idiot sees is false. Random would imply that it can be either.

No, I mean wrong. So their information is not completely useless!

*NB* The Seer can, if they wish, choose to view a role number instead of a player during the night time.

What about the idiot will he get a wrong result? Or a random? Or will that be accurate for him too?

Idiot will get another wrong result.

Hm..

IMO, Skunk/Bdh are most suspicious. However do not discount people like Silver and Ska. Silver's attitude is completely changed here; slightly suspicious. Ska is gunning for me already with flawed logic. How can me asking the wolves not to kill tonight be bad? The next round would be like round one, except we have slightly more knowledge.

I agree with apollo, the seer was "dead" when it was given to MMB, not by us lynching him.

MMB has proven in previous games that he is unable to contribute anything of worth, even if he got a role (check Mafia from Silver, MMB was detective there and managed to be completely useless, even knowing he can't be the idiot anymore he did not tell who he investigated in the nights). In wolves 2 he was easy to influence and he voted like the wolves wanted him too, making it a real quick loss. Even bdh, who was most obvious wolf last round, survived because of MMBs stupidity. Sad we wasted a seer, but good having MMB out.

Can we stop debating the MMB thing and focus on finding the wolves now? We've established that we were justified.

It's unfortunate that we lost a seer, but would anyone of believed him. Not sure if anyone can rely on him tbh. No great loss, anyone else but him, then yes.

"Can we stop debating the MMB thing and focus on finding the wolves now? We've established that we were justified."

Yeah ok we should drop it and move onto the game.

But I take serious issue with this part of your statement:

"We've established that we were justified."

You haven't established any justification you've merely read that other people who did the same thing as you said that it was ok and took that as absolution.

What I'm seeing is that most of you just won't let the young kid play because you find him annoying or stupid. It's mean and it's bullying to be frank. How does someone learn to improve if you constantly exclude them? All MMB wanted to do was play a game with you - a game where things should start afresh every time and the only thing you keep saying is you can't, you're useless, die.

Edited 9/20/2014 09:00:33

I agree with you there Ska. However MMB is underage I believe, if he can't act mature, he should have been long gone anyway.

He doesn't play the best game sometimes - but let's try to be more constructive than hurtful towards him :)

I know I'd appreciate that if I was in his position.

Why am I suspicious? I was right in saying that we know nothing first night. Other then that I have done nothing.

But in trying to figure out in who to vote for we still do not know a lot. Maybe we should take a look at Silver, people who are constantly heavily opinionated on a vote are often wolfs (like his balls in the last game), but of course that is not a lot of evidence to go by.

But the person that is the most suspicious at the moment is JSA for voting on me with giving no reason other then suspicion. You need to give a reason why you get suspicious on someone if not you might as well be giving no reason at all. But that too is not a lot of evidence to go by.

Why am I suspicious? I was right in saying that we know nothing first night. Other then that I have done nothing.

But in trying to figure out in who to vote for we still do not know a lot. Maybe we should take a look at Silver, people who are constantly heavily opinionated on a vote are often wolfs (like his balls in the last game), but of course that is not a lot of evidence to go by.

But the person that is the most suspicious at the moment is JSA for voting on me with giving no reason other then suspicion. You need to give a reason why you get suspicious on someone if not you might as well be giving no reason at all. But that too is not a lot of evidence to go by.

Hypocrite. Sorry to refer back to wolves 2, but you accused me for exactly what you are doing now. Defending yourself right from the start if someone mentions you.

That's what you do if you are innocent and you are accused, as also proved in the last 2 games. I am no hypocrite.

Ska, rubbish. MMB is too young to be on this site! He is too immature to take an active part playing here! We aren't babysitters, we have no duty to entertain him here.

Spoken with maturity Arun. You'll make a fine man someday. :(

Edited 9/20/2014 09:53:55

Arun, go home, you're drunk.

I have my voice back :D

Glad to see most players agreeing with me despite MMB turning out to be a seer.

Skunk, I have not voted for you, not do I know if I will. In my mind, you have acted the strangest up to this point; that is why you are my #1 suspect so far. Silver often acts hostile towards others; most of the guys on the warlight Skype chat can tell you that. So to me, he is slightly suspicious but less than bdh and skunk. Bdh has also acted weird this game, but going back to last game, he did not play a good game as a wolf. So I would not expect him to play a good game as a villager based on that. So he's also suspicious but not very much so (in my opinion).

But none of my suspicions right now are strong enough to vote one of those guys out, I just wanted to let the village know them and contribute to the discussion. The more likely we talk and raise suspicions on players, the more likely we can find a wolf.

That is true JSA, we need to get everyone to talk so no one can hide in the shadows.

Edited 9/20/2014 12:15:34

I don't like the MMB lynch. It cost us a seer, gave us no knowledge and was pretty mean tbh. Did anyone suggest to Dom that MMB should be excluded? That would have been much better than just autolynching him.

Skunk, how is your comment getting people to talk? You are just passively agreeing without helping.