Why can't both 1v1 and 2v2 ladders have various templates and maps used too? Much like RTL has.
Not many, maybe 3-4, but just to add some variety or it gets dull really fast.

it is a good idea, but only if only 1 and 1 are ME earth based. Otherwise is useless put 3/4 template all earth based..

1v1 could be fixed with 1v1 MME and with randomized bonuses.
No need to even rotate templates.

+1000

Voted :)

Hope the changes happen ASAP!

While reading, i stumbeled over a small issue:

Require consecutive wins to achieve a rank
Right now, the ladders just require that you win X games to get a rank. Players have proposed using a system where those completed games must be consecutive, as a measure to fight intentional delays.

It's not wins, it's finished games ?!

Probably yes. But so far based on opinion of other players (see page one).

Best would be if Fizzer correct text in poll

So one vote per player or one vote per ladder-eligible account??

lol per player. Obviously.

Could someone spell out exactly what the 0% and SR luck changes would do for the ladder?

I second the Silver's idea for a Multi-day Ladder with several templates.

Could someone spell out exactly what the 0% and SR luck changes would do for the ladder?

most important: 3v2 always win

Edited 9/2/2014 11:33:03

So 16% SR and 0% WR both mean 3v2s are guaranteed?

SR means 3v2 always succeeds. 0% is irrelevant for that. but 0% means that 5v3 always succeeds as well as 7v4

yeah. 16% straight round is a troll setting...
0% luck pls, 0%

Just voted :)

Any way to see current progress, or not?

Also, I really really dislike the idea of consecutive games requiring completion. It punishes both players - not only the staller!

Yeah Dom, that's a problem. If a game naturally takes a long time as well it could stop you getting a rating.

This just postpone getting rank. So not so big problem i think.
It will also be harder to repeatedly made run for ladder position.
And encourage staying in ladder.

So overall only pros :)

Of course. If you get game when someone made succesfull run for ladder and is stalling just for purpose of keeping rank and you are just waiting for this game to finish to get rank... it will be frustrating.

the first 15 of 25 games to get ranked consecutive would make sense. like that it sorts out the earlier opponents with a lower rating, while it doesn't avoid players to get a rank when someone plays slow for a longer time.

So 16% SR and 0% WR both mean 3v2s are guaranteed?

no, in 0% WR 3v2 is not guaranteed. it's almost exactly like 16% luck but the difference is that 7v4 5v3 10v6 and other similar attacks are guaranteed, while in 16% they aren't (for example I think 7v4 is 98%).
also gnuffone, stop complaining to fizzer all the time. I've never seen any other game creator who makes polls and cares about the players like fizzer does. and I think you forget that he decides about the game, not you. You can't always get what you want.

Edited 9/2/2014 12:42:36