Apparently if you deploy an army in an empty territory, make an attack/transfer order with that army, then delete the order to deploy that army, in orders it would still count as an attack/transfer of zero armies rather then get deleted.

I've known this for a while :)

Edited 10/18/2019 20:57:57

goodgame, does it really matter?
yes, I knew that.

It doesn't count as a delay, so it adds nothing. I think most people know.
A funnier thing that happened:
When multi-attack got introduced/tested, you could transfer indefinitely. This meant that you could make absurd amount of delays by just moving one army around between territories.

Would have been hilarious if multi-transfer wasn't removed. You could have games going on for an indefinite amount of time.

This probably is common knowledge between older members.

Edited 10/18/2019 21:05:22

I had no idea @Dan @Farah...

Can't you still do that with transfer\attack?

No. Multi-transfer on MA would probably break the game. You'd theoretically be able to make an infinite amount of orders on a given turn and there would be an incentive to do so. Combined with macro's, a script or an autoclicker, you'd probably be able to annoy the servers quite a bit.

... not to mention the other players when they can see the army move.

Farah is known for trying to break the game. As far as I know he has succeeded once with an exploit. So all similar questions can be addressed to him.

The discussion about multi-transfer came up in another thread. In this game, turn 17, you can see why it's a bad idea: https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?GameID=1000063

Farah is known for trying to break the game. As far as I know he has succeeded once with an exploit.

Shhhhhhhh.

How many of you know that this game sucks??? Fuzzy math and lame maps.... No wonder there are no paying players.

Edited 10/24/2019 23:47:28

How many of you know that this game sucks??? Fuzzy math and lame maps.... No wonder there are no paying players.

Maybe because you have only played in 3 games and are level 8. You also have un-locked hardly anything. If you keep with it, you will grow to like it. You will also become addicted

How many of you know that this game sucks??? Fuzzy math and lame maps.... No wonder there are no paying players.

Quite the interesting statement.

You mean the actual math that can be customized in a template's settings (read: kill rates) or the actual, bigger picture math that also follows a known pattern (read: move order) that allows strategization for years now?

perhaps you're talking about blockades instead? indeed, being able to blockade for 351,99999999% is not enough for some people - i unfortunately have to agree there.

or is it maybe wastelands, non&in-distribution neutrals, these definitely not customizable numbers?

quite the interesting statement indeed, so much truth backing it up

damn, now I feel the need to block by √2

warzone doesnt need "paying players". whenever you play a round your cpu/gpu gets leeched on by the server for cryptocurrency mining purposes (mainly monero). this ssame process is being used by soundcloud and twitter among various other b-list websites and has higher profit yields than traditional advertising since people are more likely to continue browsing your website when ads arent ruining the experience.