>three years

RIP Sora

fr tho, why any year requirement?

I've been playing since 2013 ! I am a veteran >:D

edit: can i get bootmaster plssssss

Edited 10/18/2018 01:13:48

Just my thoughts:

[X] The strategic community is declining.

[ ] Elitists who unanimously predicted M'Hunters would get completely demolished in the A division are capable of assessing skill.

Hey alex,

I appreciate any attempt to come up with new ideas. I'm not too keen on this one though, and doubt I would ever apply for/take up the title myself as I strongly dislike elitism. Definitely not without major changes. My thoughts are:

- If the strategic community is declining, it is because it is an unwelcoming place for new players (despite a few great individuals like yourself who are keen to talk strategy with new players). This, rather than preventing retirements, should be the focus.

- One of the worst things about the community is its habit of creating artificial drama, mainly for the entertainment of people who are bored of the game (most new players just want to play in peace). Subjectively awarding titles will obviously lead to such drama. If you go ahead with the idea, please award the titles based on objective criteria - no adjudicating panel.

- Drawing the panel from Div A clans adds to the problem, in my view. If you must have a panel, I suggest ensuring that there is at least one clanless player, at least one further player from outside Div A, and at least 2 reasonably new players on it.

- One thing I like is that your original idea incentivises playing the official ladders, so don't get sucked in to too big an MDL-focus. If you want to stop people winning the title with runs, then X days at #1 or Y months in top 5 will deal with that.

- But we all know that AWP ranking is the only thing that really matters :-p

The only thing i see which is unwelcoming to new players is the unwillingness of good players to play bad templates and get to know new players trough that. Back in the days you were bound to play some crap if you wanted to play a certain amount of games. Nowadays we have a ''too good offer'' of quality competitions like awp or mdl which give enough games for everyone.

Elitists like myself or kicorse are trapped in their safe zone and it's probably hard for newbies to find and enter that safe zone

MoD, it is for people who are, or were recently, new players to evaluate how welcoming the community is.

If you want details of why I think this, you can start a new thread - I don't want to hijack alex's.

But my point is that this idea would add to that by introducing the drama of officially-endorsed subjective evaluations by Div A players, as well as adding another unhealthy layer of elitism (I am no elitist - it is not the same thing as being good at the game.)

I direcrly answered on your post in a serious way (except calling you an elitist) and i didn't say your points were wrong. I don't see how drama is a huge problem, since i didn't see drama for quite a while. Whenever someone asks a question about gameplay or strategy, i see that question being answered seriously. I tried to show up where the main problem lies more likely than on a drama environment which seems inexistent currently.

When there wasn't such a big offer on good games i frequently joined random games of all styles and talked to people who didn't know the community yet, leading them into the community. That kind of interaction seems to be gone to a big part.

Yeah, sorry if my response seemed rude. I was just making that point that you aren't well placed to assess how welcoming the community is for newer players. Similarly, I can't comment on how it used to be.

I guess I disagree about drama ("stalling", CL9 hysteria etc.), as well as about the constructiveness of the responses that new players and map/template-makers usually get. I'm also sad about the lack of appetite for innovation and the preference for old familiar maps even if they have objective flaws such as dodgy connections.

I think it's because many of the most forum/discord-active people no longer enjoy playing the game very much, but do still enjoy talking about it. There's nothing wrong with that, but I don't think that the community should be driven primarily by their interests, as it currently is.

I feel that alex's idea, in its current form, is for such people at the expense of new players (elitism + drama).

Can one of the pre-requisites be winning CL10?

I think this seems unnecessary in general. What is the point? Does WZ need another system to determine skill qualification? If so, what you have proposed doesn't really seem to define much other then the opinions of a small group. I do think this would be great if the privilege of getting a higher title than another player is for bragging rights and banter. Then the small group of people, or better yet big group of people, can decide who is better at talking shit, thus fertilizing motive to disrespect your enemy in game challenges. It'd be like a P/R league for banter.

For example:

Your idea sucks and mine is better. If you disagree, let's settle it over a game of Macedonia no-split.

Edited 10/18/2018 10:44:41

a) The strategic community is slowly dieing out. When I joined Lynx two years ago, there were at least twice as many strategic players as today. We could benefit a lot from creating an additional motivation to continue reaching achievements for the creme de la creme of WarLight.

Im not 100% certain the strategic community is dying. To me it just feels we're in a period where new players and entering and old ones are leaving. Although to me the main problem is that the last sentence doesn't fit with what was said before. To prevent the strategic community from dying (if we assume it is dying) then the way to prevent that is to promote an influx of new players rather than promote the very best of the community to stay around.

c) WarLight doesn't have a reliable skill indication. Players without a clan may be very good, but not noticed in the strategic community if they rather play for themselves than to communicate. Mastery titles would finally offer a criteria to solve this.

To me, the MDL is actually a rather reliable skill indication, but it definitely isnt as widely known as it should be. So things should definitely be improved in that regard. As for players being really good but not known in the strategic community. I personally think this doesnt happen too often. Its hard to get really good without using QMs, ladders or participating in big community events such as AWP or WGL. There might be people who choose to go without a clan, but generally really good people dont go unnoticed as theyll pop up somewhere on the ladders or the QMs.

4. Mastery titles are assigned by a committee out of seven members, one from each Division A-clan. If a claim is supported by four of its members, its acceptance gets announced. If the committee decides to reject the claim, it has to provide a legit reason why.

I dont see what clans have to do with this.

---

As for the whole idea, I dont think it will work out. To me someone who's really motivated to get a title like that, will try to get all the trophies (or as many as possible) anyways.
To me there are two main reasons why top players quit the game. Either they get bored with the game and/or dont feel like they want to accomplish anything more. Or they overload themselves by trying too hard / being too serious and the game no longer is fun to them.
To me it feels like this idea will accelerate both cases rather than prevent them from happening.
People who want to get this achievement will either burn out before they reach it by trying too hard and thus losing the joy they had while playing this game or they will manage to get the achievement, feel like there's nothing left to achieve and be more likely to retire as a result.

Edited 10/18/2018 17:11:02

I think these are bad assessments to make. (IM) and (GM) seems foolish to make for a Warzone game. No one cares for "mastery titles." It sounds weird in my opinion. :P

Edit: I also second what Min34 said above me. Good Job Min34.

Edited 10/18/2018 16:50:17

Practical Feedback time!

Basic conditions

2. Mastery titles can't be lost. Once they are assigned, the Master decides himself if he uses the title or not, it can't be taken away from him unless the assignment took place based on false information.

A title holder must use the title. (That is sorta the point, no? )

4. Mastery titles are assigned by a committee out of seven members, one from each Division A-clan. If a claim is supported by four of its members, its acceptance gets announced. If the committee decides to reject the claim, it has to provide a legit reason why.

The criteria seems pretty strait forward. I propose, a title must be claimed by making a forum thread, with evidence/links to proof needed.
5. By being assigned a mastery title, you have to add it in front of your name. (So that you can search for all GM's and find them easily)
6. A link to the forum thread where a title holder claimed their title must be in the bio? (maybe player supplied link?)


Other stuff.
One of the hardest trophies to get is "Create a beautiful map". Such a map also greatly benefits the community. I think that this trophy should count. The beta trophy is unobtainable today, and thus can't count.

2.) Having won an AWP or a WGL or having been QM Supreme Leader**

Winning a WGL is a lot easier then the other two. Not sure WGL should count tbh.

4.) Having not less than one year of experience

Instead of doing 'time' on the site, how about doing level? If you picked level 50/60 (IM/GM), you get the same effect, while not locking anyone out. Also, a high level helps prevent alts.


The GM requirement I am a bit unsure about. It seems to be intended to ensure that players are good across a divers field of wz stuff (RT/MD, 3 trophies, tournaments etc). In chess at least, there is no requirement of being a diverse player. You can get your norm from the same place 3 times if you so wish. Not sure how it is best done, but I think the GM requirements needs tweaking somehow.

tl; dr after post 10 or so, but - seems redundant (basically collecting a number of achievements together) and elitist (you only need to care about it if you can win trophies/tournaments in the first place, so it's just a small number of players waving their dongs around). If anything, you need something that more people can achieve to stir up interest, not less people.

Edited 10/18/2018 18:10:46

If you want more players then i believe the only thing we need is to somehow find a way to close the disconnection gap between the clans and the new players.

That's an old problem of warzone we don't have any helpfull mechanic to make the new players care to find a clan or give them a reason.

Or else you will only see players who will may be good but they don't even know that this community exists cause forum is disconected from the new players they don't have any reason to care about the forum and any reason to go and see it and at the end they will play QM till they get bored and we loose more good players who they could give more to our community.

Edited 10/18/2018 19:58:43

The reason most new players don't know that the forums exist is because they play on mobile. I have noticed that a lot when recruiting for Hellas and Fizzer confirmed it in the last blog update. On mobile, they have no idea that there is a forum nor that there are clans unless they click on the icons next to our usernames.

Also, what was Sora's OG account called?

Oof, I'm horrible at strategy

Drama is still a thing, but I don't agree it's worse. At most it's easier to see because of a lack of traffic the forums get these days. If anything, the lack of moderation in the forums may be driving other people away from the forums and other public areas. Off-topic either needs to be put in a place where it's not bundled with the forums, or removed all together.

Also the public space could be shrinking as most new players use mobile, and there is no indication that this side of Wz even exists.

Sure drama will drive players away, and it should be toned down. But that isn't the main reason players are leaving.

Interesting topic and a good idea!

I must say good because I had the same idea a few years ago :)
I even bought clans for it when discounted by Fizzer (btw in my mind was more levels not only GM and IM, but an FM and CM related level too, this is why I bought 4 clans)
Very important imo, that the conditions for the titles be objective and clear.


But this is not why I am writing here, but the strategic community parts.
I mean, I don't know the srtat scene is dying or not, but I am sure it isn't well organized.
With a well organized format we could use our resources much much more effective way than now, imo.
Related the strat community a few questions/issues have arisen here in the topic which can be easy answered/solved in this way, I am sure.

And it seems that the priority of the strat scene is not too high for Fizzer, so we can't wait for him to do things, thus we have to do those. We should organize ourselves, becoming bigger, better then the strat community will be more important for Fizzer too ;)

What do you think about this?
Make Warlight Strategic Scene great! :D

What the fuck is Supreme Leader of QM? I have trademarked Supreme Leader and will murder anyone else taking that name.