Back to topic of the best 5 players:



Everything else is just bla bla. That's also why I believe it would be a mistake of Fizzer to implement to many ladders and I would even play devil's advocate by arguing that there should only be one single ladder. Pubescent dudes want to see who is the strongest and want to fight for their place in the hierarchy. To many ladders with completely different people at the top is just to confusing.

Except that I'm far from the best, and I'm almost positive I could play each person there 5 times each and come out of it with a winning record.

That's not to say winning record vs. all 5 individually, but combined.

Yes, let's go back on topic.

1. Quicksilver
2. Timon
3. Rento
4. Juan
5. 90

I'm sorry Wally for not including you, but these players are clearly on a different level.

If you played those games 1 at a time, you'd die before you finished all 25. If you went in order, you wouldn't even make it out of the top 3.

Haha what a noob you are :D

Everyone seems to be forgetting about diplomacy skill here. Who're the top 5 diplomacy players? Diplomacy is just as much a part of Warzone as "strategic" games.

#BanKnyte

Nauz, you wouldn't beat pardon the majority of your games

Nauz, you wouldn't beat pardon the majority of your games

I'm just here to save Nauz some time


That's not to say winning record vs. all 5 individually, but combined.

Best of 5 vs pardon could go either way IMO, 5 games is a small sample size, but yes, as Xeno quoted. I meant I'd expect to win at least 13 of the 25 games, not that I'd win at least 3 of the 5 in every single series.

Only one way to find out..

Nauz vs Pardon best of 5 on the following templates:

Small Earth 1v1
Small Earth Auto-distribution
Small Earth multi-attack

maybe a bit of Strat ME and than if it's 2-2.. We can have MME 0% SR as the deciding tiebreaker..

Except I don't give a shit what the result would be. I never specifically mentioned Pardon at all. It was a response to a comment about the top 5 on the ladder being a definitive ranking.

Which it isn't, but even if it was, in that context all games would be strat 1v1.

Edited 3/3/2018 03:34:23

*sees Wally's Masters secret meme about Master's slow play*

*Checks Wally's 1v1 ladder*

*goes 1 game at a time immediately after completing 30 games*

Oh the irony is strong with this one...

so is there nothing wrong with it, or am i also guilty of it. make up your mind.

my plan is to go 1 game at a time, 2 days 23 hours 59 minutes per turn, and stay at the top for 8 straight years. and point anyone who complains about it to this very thread, where people say we can play as slow as we want to.

The Wally Balls Law:

Anything Wally Balls accuses someone else of doing is fine, they did nothing wrong. But if he ever gets accused of doing the same thing, or anything, he's always in the wrong.

Also known as the Facts Don't Matter if You're Unpopular Law.

That's because your so frivolous in your accusations. After so many accusations that aren't true, not very many people will take you seriously anymore.

"First time looks at thread"

"Starts scrolling through the chaos"

"Promptly leaves"

I accuse someone of something, am told they did nothing wrong.

I do the same thing, am told it's wrong when I do it.

And the reason is I make frivolous accusations that aren't true?

Ya, that doesn't make any sense. If they are frivolous and untrue -- the same goes for when I'm accused of doing them.