Nobody, blacklisting is a pure tit for tat thing for me. As for the booting thing, I also like going with tit for tat, so speedy booting a speedy booter seems fine for me. But then again it was a 6 minute boot game on a not to big map. It's quite annoying when players can't play in time with such settings and I feel especially annoyed when I open their profile and it showes multiple real time games at once.
I would blacklist red, as he booted at boot time+ 1 sec probably. 1v2 doesn't always mean one should surrender and this game is good example for that. Sometimes, if you have more income than two players combined-there is no need to give up just because 2 are active against one.
https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=13425329 In this Bernie Sanders game I got attacked by my teammate for not surrendering. Imo, we were not losing and we had more income then the other team at turn 7. However, all other players in the game thought I was in the wrong.
I always liked playing his games on the avatar map, so it's a sorrowful event for me.
@Dutch Desire: lol :P you could have won that game if your teammates played a little longer. That guy took control from AI to attack you. I blacklisted that guy.
Well-i guess everyone can count the number of armies an opponent deploys if they use history properly; on bigger maps-roughly you can get idea of how much income all have. So, if it is even or nearby It is good to keep going to see how it turns out.
Posts 1 - 21 of 21
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.