What's a ladder?

Well you must be an outlier because you're a moron and yet you support Clinton.

Intelligence has nothing to do with your political affiliation. I have seen smart and dumb Reps and Dems. What would be unrealistic is to try to paint everything either Black & White by putting someone in a box because they supported someone in an election.

I think my comment was deleted :(

Intelligence has nothing to do with your political affiliation. I have seen smart and dumb Reps and Dems. What would be unrealistic is to try to paint everything either Black & White by putting someone in a box because they supported someone in an election.

if memory serves, you're actually pretty good at the game. that's unfortunate, you're working against my theory with this awful string of logic fails.

i would start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

AWESOMEGUY said it in a deliberately insulting way but he clearly gets the concept. exceptions do not disprove correlation. there are smart and dumb people on both sides. anybody with two working brain cells knows that. peter thiel is probably in the top 0.0001% of intelligence and he's a trump supporter. that doesn't change anything about the intelligence of all the inbred trailer trash and other rejects who support him.

Can you show some documentation of the correlation between IQ and Trump support? I have seen some exit polls of level of education and support of Trump but never intelligence and support of him. And yes, they are vastly two different things.

how to be wally balls

step 1: make a wild assertion against trump or his supporters
step 2: provide no sources for claims
step 3: when someone bites the trollbait, insult their stats

Can you show some documentation of the correlation between IQ and Trump support?

4/4 people in this thread...

also lots of stuff like this out there:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/even-among-the-wealthy-education-predicts-trump-support/

it's just obvious if you've spent more than 15 minutes discussing politics on the internet or simply looking at the people at trump rallies.

yes, they are vastly two different things.

no, they are not. this is a common theme with you. you don't understand that exceptions don't change correlation. yes there are some dumb people with lots of education and some smart people with no education -- but education and intelligence are absolutely correlated.

*5/5

Жұқтыру
Empire of Kilos
Major General Smedley Butler
(((Tabby Juggernaut)))
ＢＵＦＦＡＬＯ

still waiting to see a Trump supporter who is good at this game (and thus who we can assume might be smart)

i never said there was no proof of ur claim, just that you provided no proof of ur claim

i never responded to what you said, i just added you to the list of Trump supporters who are bad at Warlight.

What do you define as "support" in your study?

I know it when I see it.

6/6

Жұқтыру
Empire of Kilos
Major General Smedley Butler
(((Tabby Juggernaut)))
ＢＵＦＦＡＬＯ
Darth Darth Binks

Fuck!!!! Now I've got to actually win some games, so I can change my name, because Wally fucking ruined this one by using it in one of his sexual tension with Trump posts.

And the fact you even put me on that list is laughable, considering I'm a diplomacy player who's bread and butter is small nations, of fucking course my losses will number as many as Hillary Clintons Deleted Emails.

one of his sexual tension with Trump posts

lol

still waiting to see a Trump supporter who is good at this game (and thus who we can assume might be smart)

Жұқтыру
Empire of Kilos
Major General Smedley Butler
(((Tabby Juggernaut)))
ＢＵＦＦＡＬＯ

A troll, a cat-autist, an anarchist (and technically they don't uphold anyone), and a semi-average? Trump upholder and 1 supercool internet rationalist-philosopher who'd uphold Clinton over Trump, cheerio.

meantime I'm being told off by a fellow who for a while thought that he was the best player on Warlight.

You wield the same kind of weak line of thinking and gross statistic misunderstanding to justify your beliefs that Paugers does to justify his beliefs of racial superiority - cite some source that is one study that got infos on a small group of folk in one kind of examination and then try to make endsays of it that are way beyond what the infos show at all; for Paugers it's maybe some IQ test of a school done by skinhue; for you it's just you trying to justify an insult as a truth. Heck even you could make (wrong) racial endsays on this based that since Trump upholders are "less intelligent", then the ethnicities that are the Trump upholders are less intelligent ones.

Putting aside the truth that less taught does not needingly mean less intelligent, selon the source you gave, there is less than a 10% split between Trump upholding and Clinton upholding in each teaching level but for postgraduate study, which is 21%; so for ~80% population, it's roughly the same upholding by learning level. Then, there's the truth that being a biologist doesn't help you much in politic science.

And at last, Wally Balls is basing intelligence on WL through win rates...everyone knows you got to do it through levels, mate.

Conclusion: Wally Balls is a very stupid person who thought I was a Trump upholder since I also found his psychotic breakdown about Trump winning annoying.
Case closed, typed by an exorciator.

Edited 12/10/2016 06:15:41

When you say there is absolutly a correlation between IQ and education, you lost any crediblity you might have had with me. (That statement is not even close to factual) Also, the link you put up there was for education and Trump. Can you please post links where it has a correlation between IQ and Trump? Just anything other then your observations of Trump rallies or people's stats on warlight.

Infection makes a very good point. According to WB, whites are dumber than blacks and the rich are dumber than the poor.