This is nothing new. I had this back in the early 60's. There was a house on campus called "The Black House" where only black students lived and several classes that were restricted for white people only. It wasn't really a big deal, everybody got along just fine.
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 12:46:48
Well non-integration by any major group can be a huge problem to the society in the long run.
I won't be that concerned if people whose SSN is a prime number largely does not get along with others too much and live in ghettos in poverty since there is no group identity called "Prime SSN holders".
I'm concerned because a significant group with a very strong group identity that look very different from everyone else (except for Asian Indians and several other groups) that is poor, uneducated, segregated and has relatively poor relationship with others.
Edited 9/7/2016 12:48:39
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 14:25:29
The university I went to had a small dorm for black students. However I'm not sure how popular it was, because I knew one non-black guy who transferred to our school was assigned a dorm there his first semester because they had many vacancies. I suspect most of the black students wanted to live among their friends not all of whom were black.
Edited 9/7/2016 14:26:20
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 15:33:26
I don't see what's so bad at this. It's a well-known truth that folk will have better feelings to those who are like them. Muslims don't go to churches, Christians don't go to mosques. In Brazil, on private beaches, sometimes there are private beaches for whiteskins and for blackskins and it's a liked move on both sides.
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 21:33:58
^^We do not need more reasons to divide humanity since hostile aliens may exist. The difference between light-skinned and dark-skinned people in terms of appearance will always exist no matter how much intermarriage is done (just please see Latin America). However difference in appearance should not lead to difference in culture and conflicts which are undesirable. Everybody should be in the best culture and bad cultures have no reasons to exist.
I won't mind that much if people with prime SSN are poor and segregated from the rest of humanity since there is no "Prime SSN identity" and nobody believes that there is discrimination based on whether one's SSN is a prime number. However having dark skin in a largely light-skinned society is something else. Real and imaginary racism can be blamed for real problems which are probably solvable without blaming everything on racism.
Edited 9/7/2016 21:39:11
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 21:39:02
^The issue is that it is not skin color that matters. South Asian Indians are mostly dark-skinned but they are respected and integrated in America. It is true that genetically they are much closer to Europeans than most Africans (but not African Americans since they usually have some European ancestry) but this is not why they are accepted. It is because they are culturally integrated.
Edited 9/7/2016 21:41:36
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 21:43:33
You replying to every comment after you've written your own. Expect an answer, write walls of text but it is uninteresting and no serious person talks back to you. Then continue living in your disillusional world and live in a closed room called your ego. No, you're not funny
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 22:02:58
I do have a good reason to reject human sexuality and its related social constructs. Sexuality does not inherently prolong or enrich human lives. Instead sexuality is about reproduction which I have no interest in. Furthermore sexuality can lead to family, which is an institution I oppose due to its inherent authoritarian tendencies and it being an excuse and model for other forms of authoritarian governance.
Sexuality also has a lot of related social constructs such as dating/courtship (based on whether you are conservative) and other forms of related nonsense such as romantic movies, make up, etc.
For example dating/courtship is largely just wasting time. Another example is make up for both men and women which is largely nonsense. One example for ridiculous make up is that both men and women may use perfume (and different perfume!) However there is no inherently masculine or feminine perfume since perfume is inherently unrelated to humans. Ladies do not smell good because of her perfume. Instead it is the chemicals in the perfume that smell good, with or without a lady (or actually anything, including desks, floors and rabbits). The belief that humans smell good is of course absurd since they don't.
Another nonsense is the idea that men or women look handsome/beautiful. This is not an aesthetic opinion. Instead it merely means that some human is sexually attracted by some other human and has fallen into irrationality. In reality cats and trees are beautiful but not humans. Your notion of humans being handsome/beautiful only makes sense if you indeed feel that way without any attraction. Otherwise it is just more nonsense.
Edited 9/7/2016 23:36:15
California University now segregating dorms.: 9/7/2016 23:24:41
^^There is no inherent reason why any human being needs sexuality. Sexuality does not work very well for many animals nor do I believe it can work well for humans. In some sense sexuality is sacrificing a part of one's own life in order to reproduce. However there is no reason to reproduce anyway. Why does anyone want to reproduce??
Animals do crazy things for sexuality and reproduction. So do humans. Hence sexuality should be abolished as an ancient relic which is irrational and collectivist.