this thread rofl. I was looking through it, and every 2 seconds a new retard reared their ugly head xD (no offense to DDB, Imperator and Benjamin who found themselves trapped inside this hellhole)

[20:29:51] [REDACTED]: lol it's like
[20:30:13] [REDACTED]: all egdy political trolls in one place
[20:30:37] [REDACTED]: like fucking packed in one cage
[20:30:56] [REDACTED]: now, all you need to do is close it and throw to the river

obviously wasn't me btw. if i was this funny i'd have taken the credit xDDD

However between Clinton and Trump I like Trump.

Sensible things Tabby has said counter: 2

>deport 11 million people
>ban over 1 billion people
>kill the families of terrorists
>refused to rule out dropping a nuclear bomb on Europe
>lower the minimum wage
>privatise schools
>bring back torture, (even though they still have it) and worse
>calls the geneva conventions "problems"

... :S

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/278778-trump-expresses-openness-to-raising-minimum-wage

Trump is pro-raising minimum wage.

>privatise schools

Good, the government deliberately dumbs down folk. Either that or they're simply incompetent at teaching.

>deport 11 million people

Really dumb thing for him to think he could.

Edited 8/24/2016 22:54:07

>kill the families of terrorists

Bad

>bring back torture, (even though they still have it) and worse

Still a thing

>calls the geneva conventions "problems"

US barely follows them as is

You keep saying "ad hominem" but I don't think you fully understand what that means. Just because someone calls you an idiot doesn't mean they're committing said fallacy, they're right, but they are just calling you an idiot. When they call you an idiot because you provide evidence and facts (which is currently at 0%) then you could cry it. The reason we're calling you an idiot is to undermine what little if any credibility you have in politics, civics, and basic spelling/grammar. In Conclusion Trump says means things :( hurt my fellings.

Not sure if this guy is an idiot or just b8ing

Yeah the first argument I ever had with this guy, I legitimately thought he was trolling. Unfortunately, he's not, and he can also vote :/

>deport 11 million people

Negotiating stance/could be done anyway

>ban over 1 billion people

*Potentially murderous and almost certainly antithetical

>kill the families of terrorists

If you married a terrorist, I'm gonna guess you support terrorism. Just a hunch.

>refused to rule out dropping a nuclear bomb on Europe

Pls, don't be a retard about this.

>lower the minimum wage

Good thing (if you wanna discuss make a thread) + I don't even think he ever said this

>privatise schools

Doesn't want to get rid of all public schools, plus private ones are way better

>bring back torture, (even though they still have it) and worse

Really? We can't WATERBOARD a guy who kills 100s of civilians? Give me a f*cking break

>calls the geneva conventions "problems"

They are. They cause more death, and if our enemies don't follow them, why should we. ISIS could be gone in months if we f*cked international law, and it would save lives that would be lost in 10+ years of warfare

ISIS could be gone in months if we f*cked international law

What are you going to do, gas northeast Syria? Russia will be shooting American planes down in a week and you'd have started a world war.

What are you going to do, gas northeast Syria? Russia will be shooting American planes down in a week and you'd have started a world war.

One word: Dresden

One word: Dresden

So Dresden caused the Germans to surrender? Or did it finally defeat Germany? Because if I remember correctly, by February 1945, the Soviets were already in Prussia, the battle of the bulge was over and all of Germany's allies were spent. So no, it didn't put the nail in the coffin, that happened already. And Germany didn't surrender quicker because of it, they didn't surrender until after the Battle Of Berlin.

I am not a citation

back to the original frain, though, no, he's definitely got competition. He's a businessman who's done a few things from a plutocratic family. If you want mad, see some after-decolonisation African rulers, some of them were clinically mad. Francisco Ngeuma, first president of Equatoirial Guinea, killed roughly 1/5 of the population and another 1/3 fled the country, which gave Eqguinea the nickname of "African Dachau". Not only paranoid, but just batty in general. He banned using European or American inventions since they were un-African. For example, west medicine was banned, and so "traditional" medicine was the only way, and so many folk died. He went on public record saying that Adolf Hitler was a great man.

I mean, faff this bloke.

@MGAutisticSB
Carpet bombing can win wars if immediately after you go in with overwhelming force + no pussy-bitch R'soE

Having unusual views

For the 17th time, I don't think he is dumb because of his views.

Burden of proof is on you because your definition of intelligence may be different from mine.

Try the dictionary.

You keep saying "ad hominem" but I don't think you fully understand what that means.

Let me know what you don't understand about ad hominems or how others committed them, and I"d be happy to explain it to you.

The reason we're calling you an idiot is to undermine what little if any credibility you have

Avoiding my argument and attacking my credibility instead is a textbook ad hominem. And that's what is happening here.

Edited 8/25/2016 04:22:29

you do think hes dumb because of his views Wally

If the only argument you have against what I've said is to call me a liar, you don't have an argument.

For the 18th time, i don't think he's dumb because of his views. His actions and what he says reveal how dumb he is.

Since when is there one dictionary

Everybody knows what dumb means. If they don't, they have no business in a discussion about whether somebody is dumb. They need to go fix the fact that they are extremely dumb.

No, I didn't. You'd need me to expand upon what I meant by 'what he says' to know if I was referring to his views.