There are tons of idiots who I agree with politically. If they say something I agree with, that doesn't mean they are not an idiot.

There are tons of smart people I disagree with politically. If they say something I disagree with, that doesn't mean they are an idiot.

If you use 'idiot' to mean 'I disagree with you' you're doing it wrong and probably an idiot yourself.

Is Māori your first language? Let me know which part you didn't understand and I can try to explain it using smaller words.
Speaking as a half Māori, I find this extremely offensive. Even the most illiterate Māori has better grammar than Pulsey.

I personally disagree strongly with Trump, but I don't think he's dumb. He's devoid of all common sense, but he's not dumb.

you suffer from severe cognitive dissonance

No, you suffer from RCDD and probably TLID.

Reading Comprehension Deficiency Disorder. Trump Level Intelligence Disorder.

He just crumbles in the face of Jacob Zuma in terms of sheer dumbness. Zuma being famous for reading stumbling over reading out the budget figures in public.

Charles D. B. King would give Trump a run for this money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberian_general_election,_1927

Despite there being fewer than 15,000 registered voters in Liberia, he won re-election with 243,000 votes to his opponents 9,000.

So it could be worse. At least Trump can count properly.

MGAutisticSB
Carpet bombing can win wars if immediately after you go in with overwhelming force + no pussy-bitch R'soE

@GeneralAutism,
So that's why Vietnam, Japan and Germany were defeated after the first carpet bombing right?

Yeah and precision bombing had nothing to do with it?

Carpet bombing =/= Percision bombing

I know. I was concurring with your point.

So that's why Vietnam, Japan and Germany were defeated after the first carpet bombing right?

if immediately after you go in with overwhelming force + no pussy-bitch R'soE

So you want the US to bombs fortified targets on a tactical level to soften them up for infantry and armor. Which is combined arms. Which is what the US already does. Congratulations, you just said you want to invade Syria, in a long and complicated way while looking like a complete dumb***.

Also, really, switching precision bombing with area bombing? How much money do you want to waste? We should send you to lead the invasion of Syria, you'll end up bankrupting the US and ending all of the wars.

Edited 8/25/2016 19:44:19

why do you guys even bother bombing Syria? the country's already turned to a wasteland; half of it's population are refugees and the latter half is killing themselves.

save your cash and time and try to make an actual contribution like, you know, diplomacy to end the conflicts?

^

try to make an actual contribution like, you know, diplomacy to end the conflicts?

Not really in anyone's interest, sadly, or no big country's interest, anyway.

So you want the US to bombs fortified targets on a tactical level to soften them up for infantry and armor. Which is combined arms. Which is what the US already does.

You are very stupid. You destroy cities (which is not tactical at all btw), then go in to mop up without giving a f*ck about accidentally killing civilians. If it looks like a terrorist, you shoot it. And the cost part: 1 month of a shitload of bombs is better than 5+ years

You are very stupid

You're an idiot

You destroy cities (which is not tactical at all btw), then go in to mop up without giving a f*ck about accidentally killing civilians. If it looks like a terrorist, you shoot it

Then Russia/China/Iran/Syria shoots down US planes attempting to massacre all of Raqqa, WW3 has started, and tens of millions of Americans will die, and hundreds of millions of folk will die. You honestly think disrespecting Syria's sovereignty is going to result in good for you? When China, Russia and Iran all support it?

Nice, being a "non-pussy" (I.E a psychopath) has gotten you a world war.

Then Russia/China/Iran/Syria shoots down US planes attempting to massacre all of Raqqa, WW3 has started, and tens of millions of Americans will die, and hundreds of millions of folk will die.

Why would Russia or China care? We would be helping Assad by destroying ISIS.

You would have slaughtered thousands of Syrians, put tens of thousands of US soldiers in Syria, and you'll probably try to take over the rest of Syria. Either way, you've done tons of damage to Assad, violated Syria's sovereignty, probably killed a great deal of Syrian troops with your program of indiscriminate bombing across Syria, and y'd've destroyed vast areas of Syria.... you know, the place Assad wants to unite. Heck, I doubt you'd have Free Syria even as a ally after what you did. Because, you know, they wanted to still have a Syria for them to take over. Presuming you'll be striking in Iraq too, what makes you think Iraq's folk and rulers will be happy with you as well?

Approx 7 billion people will die due to the resulting nuclear war.
Precision bombing costs less than carpet bombing, is more efficient, and, best of all, doesn't result in a nuclear war.