There's no such precise law that exists in my country. There's indeed a law about child abuse but that comes together with the burden of proof. Charges without proof count as unvalid.

The state doesn't have to provide proof; it can filibuster for as long as it wants and the parent is out of luck.

And what exactly has that to do with my experience? I was employed by a company for 4 weeks I did not have signed for. Yet it was my dad who forced me to do it and only he signed the papers against my consent.

Ok. This problem would exist in both state and private law; and it could be cured in both state and private law.

Child Abuse is a serious problem though.. I've heard some miserable and sick stories of children being forced into prostitution when they were born... those people that have been raised by selling their bodies to a stranger on the internet are seen as complete strangers by the public for the rest of their life.

Child Abuse is a serious problem though.. I've heard some miserable and sick stories of children being forced into prostitution when they were born... those people that have been raised by selling their bodies to a stranger on the internet are seen as complete strangers by the public for the rest of their life.

That doesn't negate that the state is afforded protections in it's dealings that allow it to not give proof or filibuster it's way through oblivion on children being kidnapped by the state.

Let's say there is a ancap town and a statist town. The Ancap town has private law enforcement, the town has signed some stuff with them, and votes each year on whether they will replace the private law enforcement or not. They are paid either through a small voluntary payment (taxes are involuntary) or by business owners who don't want criminals running amok.

The statist town has law enforcement that is paid by the state, which is paid through involuntary means (taxes) and cannot be kicked out if they're corrupt or just plain bad.

If the private law enforcement kidnap a kid and accuse a parent of child abuse with no evidence, that parent could show everyone there is no evidence, and people could directly get at the private law enforcement's money. A business owner wouldn't want to pay corrupt police because the corrupt police would probably be ok with accepting bribes from criminals. The general public would react of course harshly to this thing.

If the state police do this, the people can vote new politicians in to try and fix it, but the police still would be getting their money and the politicians could only get so far in a corrupt system. The police have no incentive to let go of the child.

In both, child abuse that is actually perpetrated can be punished, but only in one can you keep police from you know, committing that crime.

The state doesn't have to provide proof; it can filibuster for as long as it wants and the parent is out of luck.

It does. At least in Belgium as far I'm aware. I don't know how crooked the average lawyer in America is but I've seen some interesting documentaries on those cases specifically targetting Jewish lawyers. Law and Justice? It always requires proof. Child abuse trials in Belgium have recieved a lot of media attention in daily newspapers every since the case of Marc Dutroux. Such cases are always taken seriously. And whenever an error occures in trials it hits front pages. Everything's documentated. Not even one couple lost its children to due abuse this year. Your words need context? If the state really can fillibuster them without proof then I want to hear your experience with this.

Or maybe this is a problem in certain Americain states but you exagerate your words and claim it is worldwide

Law and order is much different from the United States and Europe. I think it's crazy to say that people pay a fortune only to get divorced and end up in poverty and spend the rest of your life on the porch. Well in my country at least we don't have that.. even the most violent islamist terrorist that is responsible for more than 100 deaths can have its own lawyer. The same law that makes it possible that you can re-appeal in court 100 times again until get the justice you deserve!

Edited 8/23/2016 01:02:27

Proof is mandatory under our laws.

your ancap utopia doesn't stop people from being corrupt. Bitch. The current country with the most corruption in the world is Somalia with more than 90% being corrupted. Yes and those are actual statistics according to the global perception index.

western Europe is the least corrupt region in the world. America falls far behind.

Is proof mandatory under your laws?

Edited 8/23/2016 01:20:54

I would gladly help an elderly person fix their computer for 7-10$ an hour. Not just because I agree with capitalism with little restrictions, because I know more about computers than my peers and would therefore be a better assistant, and I would thus end up getting payed more than them. Capitalism works if you are a risk taker and have skills.

I don't get this post...is is against child work..? I don't see the problem...

@Zeph:

> implying this is an argument of any kind

Wait...so holiday jobs are illegal in America?

Umayyad goy?

Eh, i agree on the part of that there should be less restrictions on children working, but that just opens up a whole can of worms and leads to many more problems.

It does. At least in Belgium as far I'm aware. I don't know how crooked the average lawyer in America is but I've seen some interesting documentaries on those cases specifically targetting Jewish lawyers. Law and Justice? It always requires proof.

No it doesn't; the state can filibuster. I'm not sure if you get the meaning of this, but what it is is purposely drawing something out. The state does this often.

your ancap utopia doesn't stop people from being corrupt. Bitch.

Corruption leads to inefficiency. Inefficiency means that you provide the worse service and will be replaced. Cunt.

The current country with the most corruption in the world is Somalia with more than 90% being corrupted. Yes and those are actual statistics according to the global perception index.

That's a measurement of state corruption.

Okay MGSB, If a Company becomes corrupt and inefficient then the people leave it for another one yes? What if the company tries to stop them with SOLDIERS and GUNS, then what?

So a bad policing company can hire enough soldiers to rule a town? Yeah right. The money it takes to equip a US soldier is 17,500 dollars, no company could pay for enough to make them useful, along with logistics, support equipment and supplies.

And all the while it's training and equipping soldiers for this, it's income is getting more hits, as less folk are using it's services and going to different kinds.

What if they don't offer services but makes the people ''services'' like forced labour, sex etc? And if they don't even have means to protect their production and goods then why don't people with guns just raid it until the buidlings containing the said goods collapses?

Edited 8/23/2016 10:43:52

What if they don't offer services but makes the people ''services'' like forced labour, sex etc?

So criminals? You hire police to kill them off.

And if they don't even have means to protect their production and goods then why don't people with guns just raid it until the buidlings containing the said goods collapses?

They do have the means; hire police.

No it doesn't; the state can filibuster. I'm not sure if you get the meaning of this, but what it is is purposely drawing something out. The state does this often.

this hypothetical conclusion must suck if you can't show examples that happen in my country.

Corruption leads to inefficiency. Inefficiency means that you provide the worse service and will be replaced. Cunt.

and who exactly has the power to decide who's going to be replaced and who's not? Corruption is not excluded here. If simply one has the power to vote someone out .guess what. they still can sell those people out. Corruption is still inevitable. bitch.

That's a measurement of state corruption.

Somalian gouverment doesn't have much power in their own country. Most corporations exploit the land for resources from local gouverments, local villages ...

You're no better off than this ancap guy > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGAU1ap1scc who is in fact, also in favor of child labor.