http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/belgium-in-shock-over-corruption-scandal-1362650.html

and who exactly has the power to decide who's going to be replaced and who's not? Corruption is not excluded here. If simply one has the power to vote someone out

The consumer

Corruption is still inevitable. bitch

And it can be dealt with much better with my system. Cunt.

Somalian gouverment doesn't have much power in their own country

That corruption rate is still a measurement of state corruption

You're no better off than this ancap guy > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGAU1ap1scc who is in fact, also in favor of child labor.

My dude, Ancaps can disagree on things. Private law could prevent child porn too.

If child porn is prevented then bitcoins will lose surely a lot.

Edited 8/23/2016 11:24:53

BTW, Who is the police? If the state doesn't fund them they surely would not exist? And i don't think saving few people under the oppressive corporates does not gain them anything in an ancap society so why would they even do it? I mean surely slaves won't have much money to hire shit to begin with.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/belgium-in-shock-over-corruption-scandal-1362650.html

published on Tuesday 10 September 1996. Exactly 20 years ago. fun fact. I wasn't even born then. but the Marc Dutroux scandal put a new light on the Belgian laws about child protection and security and exposed corruption on national level. After the Dutroux scandal many things were reformed in Belgian courts and everyday since then new child abuse stories hit front pages.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/marc-dutroux-monster-belgium/

The consumer

you mean a jury that consists of consumers ? That already exists.

On Somalia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_Somalia
both private sector and federal gouverment are blamed. While it is true federal gouverment is heavily corrupted the same thing can be said about the corporations and the uncontrollable laissez-faire market system where no laws apply.

Edited 8/23/2016 12:15:49

BTW, Who is the police? If the state doesn't fund them they surely would not exist?

Private police. They already exist, I don't get what's the problem with thinking of them serving a larger group of folk.

And i don't think saving few people under the oppressive corporates does not gain them anything in an ancap society so why would they even do it?

You're assuming corporations would have the power to enslave, which they wouldn't.

published on Tuesday 10 September 1996. Exactly 20 years ago. fun fact. I wasn't even born then. but the Marc Dutroux scandal put a new light on the Belgian laws about child protection and security and exposed corruption on national level. After the Dutroux scandal many things were reformed in Belgian courts and everyday since then new child abuse stories hit front pages.

I suppose Belguim is better than other states on this subject.

you mean a jury that consists of consumers ? That already exists.

You mean you don't understand the idea of if the consumers don't like their product/service they can buy another?

http://usu.kochscholars.usu.edu/files/2012/11/Better-Off-Stateless.pdf

Anyway, Somalia got better under statelessness, which is the core of your anti-Somalia arguements are.

Rockefeller surely has the power to hire a medium sized army, even bill gates can hire an army 2 or 3 times bigger than gambia's.

The Rockefeller Foundation only has 3 billion in money.

fk this I'm becoming part of a socialist labor union after this. Must fight neoliberal scum like you and raise unemployment -> equality! genius!

Ever heard of money laundring?

It's exempt from taxes

And do you believe Rockefeller only has 3 billion dollars TOTAL?

And what about Putin? He alone can buy a chunk of land from Russia to establist whatever he wants.

The rockefellers lost a lot of money, they're not really that prominent as far as I know.

That still does not answer to the Putin question.

Well Putin wouldn't really be alive by the time this would happen and his personel wealth stores built by government power would be gone.

Corruption is still inevitable. bitch.

Whenever you statists are incapable of controlling themselves, people like these guys come around;

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, it is its natural manure".

- Thomas Jefferson

"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both".

- Benjamin Franklin

"Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction. We didn't pass it onto our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States when men were free".

- Ronald Reagan

Edited 8/23/2016 20:24:52

Government and big business are already twisted together, that's why third of Russia's council are millionaires (in USD). In America, the military-industrial business is a big bit of the grounds why America has had at most 5 years of peace since 1914, and likes to uphold other countries with supplies in other wars. You think this dirty selfishness will stop?

Why isn't healthcare nationalised in America (if you uphold one of the government's duties is to shield folks' lives, and the government is able to do it, no grounds not to)? Why are whistleblower laws so weak in America and Russia? There're are several organisations to stop this, and so the government interferes with that, suppressing or lobbying science and regulatory agents.

Or why are there still no gun checks in most states in America despite 80+% Americans upholding it (sure majority of both parties)?

Edited 8/23/2016 21:12:42

I'm no statist. My main political perspective is satiricalism which is in favor of child slavery and at the same time against it!

Edited 8/23/2016 21:30:05

kynte you tried to make these things sound awful in your original post and you failed lol. He's right. Child Labor laws are outdated because now we have overall labour laws that protect everyone. We no longer need to single out minorities for protection because that's the best we can do. A lot of kids can't earn money legally because of laws that haven't been changed since freaking Coolidge. It's just symbolism which isn't even useful anymore and some people are just too attached to it. On retirement, I'm not sure he was trying to change anything. He was just making a point.