@Imperator

Name one nation in history that has improved due to mass immigration of people with different culture

America

Eh, Trump and Hillary weren't the worst. The election of 1964 ( Goldwater Vs LBJ ) was an awful choice.

@Butler

lol, true.

Edited 6/3/2016 19:03:08

" Name one nation in history that has improved due to mass immigration of people with different culture "


^ Uhh, America?

Lol seriously, America was practically built on immigrants. If it wasn't for the mass immigration of the early 1900s and late 1800s, plus our massive land expansion, we could quite possibly still be a minor power ( Probably something close to what Canada is today )

Name one nation in history that has improved due to mass immigration of people with different culture

There aren't really very many historical examples, as historically countries have been very isolationist.

However, it's only common sense that having more people will make your economy better. Nobody is going around without a single cent worth of wealth or income, and In fact the average american makes $55,000 annual income.

Edited 6/3/2016 19:22:08

@people saying USA - the people that made the USA better came from Europe, a place with a very similar culture. Try again.

The other immigrants bring us down for the most part

but hey i'll still vote for Hillary because i'm not a racist and ignorant like the people who support Trump.

Pfft!

Vatica, that's an obvious example. 100% immigrant population, so without immigrants, they'd literally be nothing.

Then you have Dubai, Qatar, Kuwait, that are literally built by the immigrating.

Doesn't Qatar have some controversial work labor going on?

Mainly folk just not wanting to work. It's made out to be more than it is. Folk signed work contracts, then didn't feel like working anymore. Anyhow, Qatar is more than half immigrants - those are just migrants, most are only working there temporarily.

I see. Btw, how well did DesertFox do in his drawing of you?

Edited 6/3/2016 19:49:46

Move out of that shit country.

Cata, Europe is shit too. Both America and Europe are socialist and imperialist, so I don't see what's the big difference.

Neither America nor most of Europe is bad, they're very high living standards, first-rate countries.

Cata, Europe is shit too. Both America and Europe are socialist and imperialist, so I don't see what's the big difference.

I am planning on moving to Australia when I am older.

No terrorists, No Trump, No Hofer, No problems.

No terrorists, No Trump, No Hofer, No problems.

Their watch is right now very authoritarian, they gaoled many folk for speaking against the government, and there's the Indonesian immigrants. Your money would still be going to fund military strength far away in Afghanistan.

Idk about politics in Australia, but literally everything there can kill you. Seriously, it's like a zoo exhibit of deadly animals.

I do agree that they are both awful candidates. I'm not sure why you would need to follow it up with a "I'm voting for this one because..."

Are they awful candidates or not? If so, why would you vote for either one? If more people voted 3rd party, maybe we could eventually force the major parties to give us candidates that we like.

Having said that, I have noticed that the US has a remarkable ability to survive awful presidents, so it's not going to be the end of the world no matter which one gets in.