You guys talking about incest are chatting rubbish. In certain cultures and religions, marrying your cousin is considered incest, and in certain others, it is not. Eg. In Islamic law, you can marry your cousin or your step-sister, however you cannot marry your wives' sister or your father's wives (stepmother) even after they divorce. I myself would never marry one of my cousins because obviously in the culture of the British which I was brought up in, it is considered gross.
So basically, you don't really care what holy scriptures have to say about incest or sexual minorities. You cite them as evidence when it suits your homophobic agenda, but you argue against them when they advocate incest.
Prophet Muhammad slept with a 6-year-old girl, and according to Islam, every muslim should strive to live like prophet Muhammad did. Are you advocating pedophilia now as well?
Listen, the Prophet Muhammad did not sleep with a six-year old girl. He married her in a ceremony when she was six years old and she only lived in his house when she was nine. I have no idea when the marriage was consummated but I presume it was after she began living in his house. He did not sleep with her before she had reached puberty. Also, she stayed with him in marriage until he died, so you cannot say that he abused her in any way during her childhood as she would obviously have left him. Also, when Muhammad married her, it was because another man who was a pagan and had not converted to Islam was interested in her and had approached her father to ask for her hand. Her father/mother disapproved of the match, and decided to marry her to the Prophet instead. She did not marry again to anybody else after the Prophet's death and did not bare any children or become pregnant during her lifetime.
I don't see any sign of the paedophilia you claim in any of the above.
Eklipse, stop it already. Quit trying to act as of your above all this talk. It was Xyk who said "where does it stop" as if allowing gays and trangenders opens the floodgates for the billions of fetishes to be legalized.
Eklipse, stop it already. Quit trying to act as of your above all this talk. It was Xyk who said "where does it stop" as if allowing gays and trangenders opens the floodgates for the billions of fetishes to be legalized.
Stop what, pray tell?
Yes, one person mentioned those but then everyone else took the comment and started on a parade of topics that aren't what this thread is about. It's for the better actually that this topic got derailed, but at this point it's time to hit the kill-switch on it.
funny how you've been saying that since it was created. It's almost like you don't want people to talk about change so nothing happens and you and your little cult can sit around and laugh.
The time I've spent reading the small minded views expressed by some here could have been better spent tossing off to pictures of my sister. Damn you for wasting my valuable time.
funny how you've been saying that since it was created. It's almost like you don't want people to talk about change so nothing happens and you and your little cult can sit around and laugh.
Lawlz, i think your entire persona is just troll bait.
Atheist LGBT who thinks anybody who disagrees with him is an idiotic catholic bigot. You're sad if you have to hide behind such facades as what religion someone is; would you judge someone by their sexuality as fast as you judge them by religion, 2 equally important aspects?
Overall, i just don't buy it. I think lawlz is the complete opposite of what he says he is due to how overwhel,,mingly depressing it would be for him to be a person on real life, where everybody one at a time is tolerating LGBTs but not everybody can just like them because they exist.
Tl;dr lawlz - you should've kept yourself in the closet about this on the forum. You've served to agitate the forums with mindless rabble for the past few weeks (that said, i think it very brave of you if you have announced yourself irl). Religion tolerating LGBT isn't a one way street.
