Cardiff Blues and Wales - Rugby Union. Cardiff City FC and Wales - Football (soccer as some of you will call it) Glamorgan - Cricket (it's like baseball, just better)
Not a fan of the sports big in America like baseball, basketball, American Football etc. Don't mind Miami Heat in the NBA but that's only because they have won me a fair bit of money from betting on them.
Joe Flacco has one of the best winning records in the first years he has been in the league. He might not get the pretty stats but the dude is a beast when it comes to the playoffs which is what really matters in the end. He gets the job done even though half of his receivers suck.
I'm not saying Brady is bad(he is great) but I will take Joe over Brady.
King, Flacco is 72-40 regular season (64%) and 10-5 postseason (67%).
Brady is 160-47 in regular season (77%) and 21-8 postseason (72%) Brady's first 7 seasons he went 86-24 (78%) and 14-3 postseason (82%) Brady would have to lose the next 42 straight games to fall to Flacco's current win percentage.
Flacco has 72 wins in the regular season. 10 wins in the Playoffs. I don't get how thats far away from Brady? Also he is doing this in the hardest AFC division and going through 4 different Offensive Coordinators.
So wait... you don't get how 72-40 is not close to 160-47? In order to match Brady, Flacco would have to win his next 64 games. He would have to go undefeated in FOUR STRAIGHT SEASONS to just MATCH Brady.
The only areas Flacco is better than Brady is in the deep ball, drawing DPIs, throwing interceptions and taking up more cap space. That's it.
I'm not even sure Flacco is top five... the consensus top 3 are Brady, Manning and Rodgers in some order. Then Roethlisberger (a better win percentage than Flacco), Luck, Wilson and Brees enter the conversation.
King, Brady was a full undefeated season better than Flacco over their first seven seasons. If you don't thi that is a big difference then I don't know what to tell you. He also had 3 Super Bowl wins...