Seems we use the word "fun" in different ways. Large scale diplo games (and even moreso Diplo RP games) seem are actually fun, just the mechanics dilute it to a point where they are (for me) unplayable (without serious tracking effort that I'm not willing to put in).

All of wz is fun Krind. Learn that now

In order to make 100 player custom scenario diplo games to work, Fizzer have to rework both the custom scenario making system and the in-game chats. The current custom scenario maker can only handle 50 slots and it still get really laggy at times, and the chats just cannot handle 100 players nearly spamming text in the public.

In game chat needs to be reworked anyhow. It's unmanageable already even with only 40.

Problems:
- No group chats
- No notes for self (some people create templates for solo games which have a 'Team' tab so you can make notes for self - but it should be part of the game)
- Private chats bring up a list of unsorted names
- Tabs for private chats on previous turns you've already read are closed, so to review them you need to reopen the private & click "Load Older Messages" - which means you have to keep track of who you're chatting with yourself and proactively reopen/reload them yourself
- Should add 'Private chat' option from the 'Players' dialog box (and should sort this list of names as well)
- Needs filtering options, to hide/show chats from specific players only

Chat not working good enough is the reason the roleplay games im in have all abandoned WZ and moved to discord. WZ simply doesnt work with that many chat messages.

In the past year, WZ games with chat were responsible for 100% of my browser crashes (2/2 times).

the tabs update may be a step forward in this krinid. bc honestly it was kinda small so the next update may be a bigger update than usual

how do tabs help with the chat problems?

*shrugs* im grasping at straws

We need the ability to invite players to mega games.

Okay, we've now the possiblity to make games up to 200 players!
This is really great, although I find it way to expensive to create ONE game for 1700 coins (€17)
I hope this will change in the future, please include members for making Mega games, they already support Warzone periodically.

i think one 100 game every 2 weeks for members is reasonable, maybe if u decide to wait another 2 weeks u can make that a 200 game

I don't see many 40+ player games in the open game tab, another clue it could be more usefull to lower the cost one way or another

i think one 100 game every 2 weeks for members is reasonable, maybe if u decide to wait another 2 weeks u can make that a 200 game

That would be way too many mega games.
However, $18 is too much, thats enough to buy entire games, which would be a better use of those coins than buying 1 WZ game.

I don't see many 40+ player games in the open game tab, another clue it could be more usefull to lower the cost one way or another

Its probably a combo of the price and the lack of available settings. If Custom Scenario would be allowed, there would be more mega games, cause all the diplo players would love it.

Agreed nobody wants to pay $18 for a game they could potentially get eliminated from in the first few turns...

The whole idea of paying to create a game makes no sense. Regardless of whether it is in context modded games for non-members or mega games. Nope nope nope.

Regardless of whether it is in context modded games for non-members

Yeah, i think this is one of the main reasons why there are so few games with mods. The other main reason being that most people cant make a game with normal settings, and mods only make that worse....