Yes thanks Green.

Why do we want a multilynch? People keep coming out of the woodwork.

Semicedevine could be a Jester, awol Wolf or just a villager who doesn't understand the game.

I vote Eliza for the moment. The inactive list is dwindling, thankfully.

Edit: Why would we want to lynch green? If someone wants a multilynch of inactives vote Alias09 for 2.

Edited 2014-10-29 11:46:10

Arun, this dictatorship is ridiculous. Why are we so hard on lurkers already. In the last game I didn't contribute on the first day and a half. Chill man. Lurkers wont start annoying me or arousing my suspicion for a little while.

I am not part of your little hierarchy and do not support any chance of a multi lynch. If you weren't confirmed...

Also, you are talking as if me and you have discussed this already.

Ohh, right I missed the fact that Arun was confirmed.

Edited 2014-10-29 11:53:47

We don't want to lynch Green but we want to get as many inactives as possible. Therefore voting Eliza is bad (at the moment) as is voting Green.

His Balls, you've seen how long inactives remain. Better to take them out now before other suspicions come into play.

ARUN... what makes you say voting for ELIZA or GREEN is bad?

If the strategy is to get lurkers out... then so be it. Inactives, as well explained in past posts are of no consequence whatsoever.... I have seen Green's comments... but, I have no read Eliza's yet.

HIS BALLS is right. Something fishy you are threading..What is the point to coerce GREEN into changing his vote.. that's dictatorship... Please allow all the villagers to express themselves in whichever way they see it fit.

Just one more question..... if G Arun is a "Dead Villager" how is possible that his spirit still "lurking" around this forum?

Is this against the rules?

No. Not if it compromises the plan.

Voting Green is bad - he is sctive. Voting Eliza is bad - it further unbalances the vote. By balencing we give the confirmed villager greater control.

If somebody finds my post above strange... please check Page 9 of this forum..
http://warlight.net/Forum/Thread?ThreadID=59195&Offset=160

We prevent the wolves taking early control. We lynch on the village's terms.

Im alive, Landalf..

UNVOTE: ELIZA



VOTE: Alias09

G Arun... I am beginning to understand you.... but dont be so heisty

Change vote to : Silver

might change

It would be helpful if you gave your reasons for voting for X player or changing from X to Y. We need to gather as much information as possible at this stage.

If you want to kill lurkers arun, you have to actually give them a chance to lurk first. It's day 1. We do not want a multilynch, that would be crazy.

@Green Don't take my vote personally

For the 1st few days we are literally just voting for anyone.

And for last game alot of the time the villagers where the inactive ones.

Therefore I would rather go for an active person then a non-inactive one.

@Ace Windu , its day 2

Arun, as far as I'm aware your reason for wanting a multi-lynch is to wipe out all the players who look like their inactive in one day so later days aren't wasted lynching inactive instead of wolves. Villages who don't contribute aren't going to be much of a help later in the game anyway.

Ace and Balls, you seem to be thinking like I did initially. Why risk killing loads of villages early when we have wolves to hunt. A multi-lynch is a massive risk because it could potentially kill off many villages who, even if inactive, could be of use later (as a meat shield/extra lives for the village). Also branding villagers who missed the first vote as inactive is a bit reckless after just one vote.

I think it would probably best to lynch a single inactive player atm. But I'm going with the one confirmed villager because I have votes against me (for reasons that still aren't that clear to me, just because I missed the first vote?) and I don't want to risk myself - I don't think I have much choice at the moment. I'm not too happy with the 'dictatorship' that general Arun is leading, but it's probably best for the village until there are other confirmed villagers.

As much as I hate to admit it, Arun is our biggest asset at the moment. But I may change my vote depending on how this plays out because I have to say I leaning towards Ace's and His Balls' argument.

tl;dr I think the answer atm is following Arun, but I don't think Arun should be pushing a multi-lynch this early on. I think we should lynch one inactive/lurker player first, and then after the second vote we'll know with more certainty who is active and who is lurking and who is inactive. Then we could proceed the a multi-lynch if necessary.