I want to create a challenge, competition between two clans ReLite and WM.
I hereby request with question if the clan [WM] is interested of joining?
Please report the people of the clan [WM] willing to take part in this competition. By the way, please suggest the map and the type of competition. Personally I suggest: three games 2vs2, two games 3vs3 and one big gameplay 6vs6 . So a minimum of 6 players from each team.
if WM doesn't play, RSP are up for the challenge.We only have 6-8 active people, and we're not as good as the WMs, but I think we are around your level.
this is very interesting.
if other WM are ok for play, i will play for sure, i like challenge :P
but first we have to speak about some things:
-temaplate
-all games worth one point? or 3v3 worth more then 2v2?
-why no 1v1?
Everything is still up to debate, of course.
1vs1 rather show individual capabilities instead of team play and I would like to have a challenge based on team play instead of individual. Bet on team competition.
Points:
2vs2 - 2
3vs3 - 3
6vs6 - 3 (obviously not 6, its too much points since game is almost 50/50% to win)
Settings:
0%luck, straight round.
Map:
2vs2 - strategic 2vs2 same as in ladder
3vs3 - china big or small
ahhh of course, there goes warlightrat and his usual sense of superiority! How surprising.
why not rat, i hope you realized the 1v1 game i played with you was a joke :P
i challenge you and your warlighter boys to a 3v3 eu, what do you say, rat?
Qi, why Relite winning team games? I think WM have very good 3vs3 teams, especially Gnuff and Szew. Both teams have very good sides, but my money is on [WM]
I could smell that coming for a long long time, but I am very surprised it's Jupiter, not Aranka announcing it. I'll be more than happy to play this challenge.
We are glad to accept your challenge, but why you want to play a 6v6? From my personal experience with the international cup, where we had to play 1v1 2v2 3v3 and even 7v7 (later become 5v5), that last game wasn't that much "skill indicator".
I dunno large team games are for sure a skill thing.
The more players a team, the harder it is to coordinate picks, get a good plan for the game, good tactics. Do you want everyone in combat, do you want to cluster, spread, etc.
I just don't think anyone plays enough of the large team games to begin getting that skilled.
I'm basing this off of the fact that 1v1s I find and have noticed the easiest type of games to learn, then 2v2's then 3v3's etc.
I'm not in any way suggesting I'm good at any of these. :P
So it'd be cool to see if [WM] and ReLite who both have large(enough) talented player bases to do a 6v6 with all very talented players, if they could begin to delve into and see if there is any strategic possibility to a 6V6.
Also you can exchange the Y with "Attention you put in teamwork".
When i play more than 4 in a team, i really don't give a fuck about the others. I watch only my part of map. I would go crazy to chech...don't know 6-7-8 orders :/
Oh god Sze that graph... 2 out of the 3 players in a 3v3 just need enough skill to shut up and do what theyre told (by you). 1v1 specialists are the masterrace of WL.
i agree with sze. any graph (of skill vs # of players/team) should look like a woman's breasts from the side angle. but i disagree with the perfectly flat stomach. women come in different shapes and sizes. but based on sze's graph, it doesn't make sense why he can easily reach #1 on the 1v1 ladder and gnuff has too. but as a team they made odd picks/moves so they were only the 5th or 6th best active ladder team.
hedja, it depends on who plays the team games for wm. randomly select players from wm, and relite wins. pick wm's best team players only, wm wins.
dead, wl is all about 1v1 me. that's why i call it 1v1 me, bc when many of these 'me' players play a team game requiring 'team' coordination, they still think more about 'me' than 'team'.
