<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 201 - 217 of 217   <<Prev   1  2  3  ...  6  ...  10  11  
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:23:30


[WM] Gnuffone 
Level 60
Report
sure we will want a rematch. but only after july (i and red have exam until july)
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:28:28


Aranka 
Level 43
Report
Sure Gnuffone

Better to have all things settled then stop playing halfway into the tournament.
Even though at that time the tournament was more or less decided, the long waits and indirect irritation remain a slight blemish on the challenge.

On the other hand, I'm sure WM would feel obliged to even out the scores and gain more then 3 points in the rematch.
In July I assume you guys will also have the new recruits from the WM tourney challenge ?
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:30:46


Odin 
Level 60
Report
gg :-)
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:35:40


Aranka 
Level 43
Report
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:41:29


[WM] Gnuffone 
Level 60
Report
@ aranka i don't know about new recruit. but on july i want challenge jupiter and ciekiu in 1v1 2v2 3v3, on multiaccount too if they will accept.
from Tomorrow i start exam, and i can't play much WL. i try to reduce my multyday to less then 10/15. or i will might go on vacation mode.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/28/2013 14:44:58


Aranka 
Level 43
Report

from Tomorrow i start exam, and i can't play much WL. i try to reduce my multyday to less then 10/15. or i will might go on vacation mode.


Been there,done that :P
I know how warlight can become like hell with too many multiday games and the requirement of finishing all of them within the 3 day time limit.
Just takes all the fun out of the game.

With regards to challenging Jupiter and ciekieu, you'll have to ask them personally.
For the 3vs3 I would once again be willing to play if you and they accept that.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 11:23:56


Odin 
Level 60
Report
Looking back, Gui predicted the outcome pretty well. WM was better in 1v1's (3-2) and ReLite was better in team games (5-0).

Yes, I accept counterchallenge.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 14:06:17


[WM] Gnuffone 
Level 60
Report
you will could accept a challenge on multiaccount 1v1 2v2 3v3? on july.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 15:03:56


Odin 
Level 60
Report
Ok to all of those.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 15:06:49


[WM] Gnuffone 
Level 60
Report
good :)
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 20:57:25


Mike |GG| 
Level 61
Report
I can play 1v1 or 2v2, but i dont like multiaccounts (dont have my own). I wrote that somewhere on forum wich was quite shitty translated by myhand.
Obviously i have more luck in games against you Gnuff than against Red, but somehow i did won that challenge game.
Anyway ReLite is a clan of team games and teamplay and thats why we did so good.

PS. ReLite are thinking about challenging APEX if they are interested. Challenge in nearby future.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 21:07:09


[WM] Anonymous 
Level 57
Report
You got the point man. The fact that "somehow" you won the challenge game but when we played more things went differently, says that playing only 1 games it's not the best indicatore someone have to measure "who is better". As some luck is involved in warlight, the only way we can reduce it is to increase the number of games.

I also understand that in a clan challenge is not possible to play a best o 7 for everyplayer. Anyway you did good. GG. Expect the revenge, maybe played on more games
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 21:59:51


Aranka 
Level 43
Report
Dear Anonomymouse,

Here's a lesson in basic statistical enquiry.
The only reason one would have to extend the amount of n in a future trial is that if a trend was seen, but significance on the previous trial could not be proven.
Out of my head I guess 14-3 is a significant result which can not only be declared by interplayer variations and random luck. The p value as such would be 0,05.

Furthermore, experiments are not conducted to get a proven result. They either prove a hypothesis or they don't. Consistently repeating experiments till you get the desired result (WM wins), is not very consistent and fair to the alternative hypothesis.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 22:07:24


[WM] Anonymous 
Level 57
Report
Dear Aranka. Read my previous post better. After that i'll wait for your apologize.
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 22:18:01


[WM] Anonymous 
Level 57
Report
Nevermind Arangaka, i will do it for you.

Here is a lesson of (not english, because i'm not a master)understanding.

Jupiter pointed out that in the play off challenge i won 4-0 but somehow he won the challenge GAME (hint: the "game" word is fundamental to the good understanding of this as we talked about that specifical game, not the entire challenge). So all your argument about 14-3, about p value and everything has no point to be there.

My thought, after reading that i think in 5 different threads, posts and games, is that you are priding like a little kid for his achivement. It would be enough to read my last part of sentence to understand that i said gg for the overall challenge and to get my sportmanship attitude.
We accept the defeat, think about mistakes and lear the lesson (in this case to never underestimate anyone).

Now my question (before i'll get really pissed off) is: when will you stop this?
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 22:29:40


Aranka 
Level 43
Report
Stop what Red ??

I concur with your admission. Your english is pretty hard to follow....
Challenge. ReLite vs WM: 5/29/2013 22:31:33


Aranka 
Level 43
Report
Sai che puoi anche descrivere ciò che si vuole dire in italiano. Cercherò di capire che, come meglio posso. Meglio evitare confusione e tale.
Posts 201 - 217 of 217   <<Prev   1  2  3  ...  6  ...  10  11