HHH will die anyways if he doesn't show up and vote/discuss, so i don't see the point voting for him atm

(Also his vote was very swift)

I disagree. I think he has been paying attention, and just happened to be the first to vote, not exactly swift since we've been talking so much in between this day and his vote.

Vote: HHH

It's most likely he's forgotten about signing up or something. We are not going to loss anything, unless he's an angel. But you'd think he would actually get involved, if he was.

Edited 2014-09-21 23:14:40

Why not let him die to inactivity?
Sounds like a waste of a lynch to me.

I disagree with this vote. Again using Wolves II as precedent, myself and others waited until the endgame before drawing attention to ourselves--for the good of the village, we had to wait before playing our cards. This sounds like an attempt to force a special into the spotlight way too early, and because of that I counter-vote Clavicus. Lawlz might be a suspect as well.

Voting HHH seems silly to me.

I honestly have no idea who to vote for right now (guess I'm not really awesome at this game :p). I can live with bdh, I do agree he does seem bloodthirsty, then again he could be a overzealous villager.

Also I know everyone says Arun's strategy of not voting the first day is stupid, but there is actually some merit in it. Detectives (and seers) will have done their work which could give extra info to the town, so everyone who is saying you shift day 1 isn't exactly right IMO. Note; I'm not saying it's the optimal strategy.

I will vote blind because I dont know who to vote.
the useless vote for C-17

Of course , we could try to double lynch HHH and some1 else but that could go south.

Oh well, I'll start it again in that case...

I vote for Bdh1998

I vote for ∆Bdh1998∆ as well then.

My feeling is still that bdh or silver is a wolf. I hate to jump on the badwagon here, but there seems to be some inertia going for bdh, so that is the way I'm going to vote, (but I would prefer to have one or both of them seered instead). I know I said this before, but if we do lynch bdh and find out he is a wolf, LAWLZ MUST BE NEXT. We all know that Lawlz is the worst bluffer in the world (sorry, buddy!) and we gotta remember how quickly he jumped on bdh's side in the bdh vs. silver thing (even though he has been subtly trying to moderate his position since then). Just my thoughts as of now...

Vote: Bdh1998

New suspicions based on votes:

Clavicus and Apollo: Why HHH? He is so silent; I don't understand the point of voting him out when there are others that are more likely to be wolves.

Tactical: Follows what everyone else votes usually.

I will Vote: Bdh1998

Dr. Stupid's logic is very good in my opinion. We learn more from voting for bdh than voting for anyone else in my opinion. Maybe it'd be good to keep it close between him and one other person just to see if someone else looks more suspicious from that. But if Bdh is a wolf (seems likely), Silver is almost certainly not, and Lawlz is most likely to be. If bdh is not a wolf, Silver is likely to be a wolf and Lawlz is unlikely to be.

Why HHH? Because I don´t know who to vote for, so i´m picking the safest option to me which is somebody who appears inactive. I don´t know why you´d think this is a swift vote after all this time, but whatever, it got you guys voting, didn´t it?

Tactical Incursion: Jumping on me because I paint a target on myself, suspicious much? This circle of zealotry could go on forever. I'm going to vote, and an honest villager shouldn't have to worry about you jumping on them when they do it.

Eliza's two posts were: I don´t know who to vote for... And after Silver replied with MysterManBall, saying: OK I vote for Mystery Man Ball.

Your *plausible* suspects are to me just rivals jibberjabbering about nothing at all really. If you have some compelling evidence then feel free to let me know but I don´t see anything plausible yet.

Can we change our votes on this game?

I'll abstain from voting. Too unlikely today, tomorrow should have more refined results.

One thing to remember here is: Wolves don´t need to play mindgames and convince you to vote for the wrong person. Sitting quietly and letting us stab each other whilst they pick us off is EASY for them. Trying to get somebody lynched is not evidence that the person is a wolf at all. This goes for Silver and BDH both.

Evidence that somebody is a wolf is seeing them silently slide into a bandwagon when a villager makes a WRONG choice. They have no reason whatsoever to initiate any lynchmobs unless it is to protect one of their own, and even then is it worth the hassle of potentially outing themselves?

I disagree.
Most wolves can't keep their mouthes shut.
Being a villager is by far the most boring role in the game and when you look at the last game, most players that died due to inactivity were villagers, only one wolf among them.

So even while I'm sure that not all wolves have participated yet, they will.

Edited 2014-09-22 02:35:59

We all know that Lawlz is the worst bluffer in the world (sorry, buddy!) and we gotta remember how quickly he jumped on bdh's side in the bdh vs. silver thing

There was no "Siding with BDH".

Bring it on...

-Silvia

Twas' brought. But you didn't see me trying to convince everyone else to vote for him, nor was I going with a bandwagon. I just felt like having some fun.

Also, I'd like to point out to everyone that wolves have NO PROBLEM throwing one or two of themselves under the bus to clear their names for a few days. NO PROBLEM.
So please do not think that since someone here opposed someone who later turns out to be a wolf that he is innocent.

In fact if Bdh gets lynched now and turns out to be a wolf, I really hope that people will still suspect the people who initially rallied against him. Yes, myself included.

What benefit do you see in abstaining ghengis? We need to stimulate discussion at risk of losing a villager.

I don't want to bandwagon but I honestly think BDH is the most sensible vote here.

Bdh