The lynching of 2 villagers makes no sense at all.

I advocate the lynching of everyone who claims it makes sense.

When I speak I mean in general who I want to be seen dead. I'll have to start paying attention :D

there are multiple seers and angels for those who arent aware.

Now I have to read the thread because I think you are trolling :/

Edit: Nope, he is right.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:05:55

It's not definite that there are multiples of each special villager. There may be one or more of each.

It would be unreasonable for there to be too many imo. Also, I think there is one of each special, but one kind of special may be repeated by the copycat person.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:07:30

I can assure you all that I'm not a wolf.
EDIT: So lynching me in case I'm wrong about all this is silly.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:22:51

Silver posted his last post while I was typing mine.
So i didnt react to his post, but I will address it now.

Silver said the following:

Perfect scenario would be 7-7 tie between MoD and MMB.
If MoD is a wolf and MMB isn't it proves I was wrong, so horribly wrong.
If MoD is a villager and MMB is a wolf it proves I was right, so horribly right.
If both are wolves I'd be super confused about their internal pickering.
If both are villagers I'd just admit I was wrong and that's it.


That is never a perfect scenario

A double lynch would only mean having the chances of two villagers dying first day. How can that be a perfect scenario? The villagers main interest is not getting innocents killed. Every senselessly killed villagers diminishes their chances to prevail. You dont seem to have that interest. You are utterly convinced of your accusations. Yet and this is another suspicous behavior, you dont want to accept any consequences of you being wrong (i admit I was wrong and thats it)
I am a villager myself and I can assure i am almost always uncertain of me being right because of the lack of information i got. You seem so certain. Why?

In my mind that adds up to the following. You are either totally selfconsumed and drowned in your selfimportance and arrogance that you fail to be reasonable enough, or you are just a wolf.

I said certain things about you, because as public person that you presented yourself, I expected some kind of justification or clarification in response to my post. You did not do that. From writing whole pages of accusations you now went to dropping one liners.

So for you (and hisballs) advocating doublelynching, I recomend you and hisballs for lynching. Let that be my testament in the case of me being eaten by wolves this night.

Gnuff. I Dont think it was because there were too many wolves that they won last time. I think it was due to an incompetent village and a few too many players not contributing. Also there is definitely not one wolf as the dynamic of the game would be ruined. I think two would be way to hard for the wolves too. Unlike in real life a definitive record of how everyone voted in the past should really make this game too hard for the wolves if the villagers concentrate.

Lynching of two players is not ideal I just want to see silvers theory burn. How many to vote? What's the current score?

I was joking before but actually arun has arises my suspicion again. Vote arun.

I can assure you all that I'm not a wolf.
EDIT: So lynching me in case I'm wrong about all this is silly.

What prompted that reply was this:

So, my vote is MystermanBalls and if he turns out not to be a wolf, we will vote on Silver next turn, for his convincing advocacy of killing an innocent villager. Lets tie Silvers fate to mysterymanballs.

You were certain that his balls. is a wolf but agreed to vote for MMB anyway.
So in the case of MMB being a villager why derail from that?
Why not vote for his balls. even if MMB turns out to be a villager after today?

We should lynch his balls. tomorrow, almost everyone agreed that he is a wolf so todays outcome shouldn't really matter right?
Unless of course he gets killed/saved/seered over the night.

The villagers main interest is not getting innocents killed.

No the main interest is to kill the wolves.

that game starts to be fun! ^^ unluckily i won't be able to be part of it much longer :P kill MMB and no balls. silver is alright. what he says makes sense. he sounds arrogant sometimes, but killing nobody as you suggested myhand is bad too. if the villagers lynch someone, they got a small Chance to pick a wulf. the wolves kill anyway someone in the night, so they are always in the Advantage the less People get killed by voting. if we could kill all but 1 Person right now i would do it. villager would win most probably.

Im skaking as f*ck

@silver At least you calmed down and started to reason again.

I voted mmb just because i saw the reason of not jumping on the bandwagon of lynching some random guy out of the blue, who happened to be MoD. Me voting for hisballs wouldnt have given any chance of him getting killed, because it would have just further split the votes.
I agreed on mysteryman because you made a plea for him to be killed, one i could see at least some information coming out from.
If you made such a strong case against someone you are not convinced to be a wolf and dont want to face the consequences in case of you being wrong, just makes it even more likely for me that you are a wolf.

Edited 8/26/2014 17:49:09

Arun doesn't actually believe its me by the way. He is just posturing.

If you made such a strong case against someone you are not convinced to be a wolf and dont want to face the consequences in case of you being wrong, just makes it even more likely for me that you are a wolf.

If I was a wolf I'd never bring this sort of attention on myself.
And of course I don't want to die only because I was wrong, this game is far more fun than anything else in WL right now. For me at least.

I have played a similar type of this game in the past. Is it too late to enter?

..... ah hah!

@MoD yeah i was thinking the same.
I was trying to plead for everybody voting himself. The angel would save himself, the muse would save himself, villagers would win. So much for theory.
In reality the wolves could delay their votes, spliting them properly and making the village lose.

Last game the village to wolf ratio is 4:1 now I think its 5:1

Blimey, just got back in from work! Been following this (sort of) at work today - it's been manic!

There will be a vote update, (and a shocking twist :o) later this evening!


Sneak preview - I'd already pre-decided to add a player late! A couple of requests have been handed my way since, and I intend to use them to create a few curveballs ;)