<< Back to Clans Forum   Search

Posts 61 - 73 of 73   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/23/2014 14:37:43


Jefferspin 
Level 62
Report
I was really enjoying that Turtle/JSA discussion. Bring it back please.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/23/2014 14:53:40


Master Miyagi • apex 
Level 59
Report
this thread is pointless
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/23/2014 15:00:17

JSA 
Level 60
Report
Most warlight threads are pointless. This one is meant to cause clan arguments I think (and it has scuceeded).
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/23/2014 18:18:22


GUI
Level 5
Report
Doesnt clan league already rank clans?
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/23/2014 18:44:00

JSA 
Level 60
Report
Yeah the clan league already ranks clans. But it doesn't reward depth and can't compare clans in different divisions. For instance, saying WG is the best clan right now just because they won the clan league seems very silly. Apex added 2 top players (Timi and Piggy), and 20 never had the chance to play WG in the clan league last season.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 01:03:43


Incaman
Level 58
Report
Maybe it's not my place to argue here, but i kinda stumbled upon this thread and read Normans post. Then i read JSA...so i have to reply. Saying clan league doesn't matter because it doesn't reward depth is like says Olympic games don't matter because they are one time event, it's like saying that Germany is not world champion because Argentina may have beaten them in a second game.......if leagues don't matter then there wouldn't be sports, it's all about functioning at the right time under pressure....I don't mean to offend anyone but that's just excuses. I don't follow any league here but if WG won the clan league...well they are the best clan. Sorry guys better luck next year.

Edited 8/24/2014 01:10:05
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 02:46:52


Master Turtle 
Level 62
Report
I agree with you slightly Incaman. Yes performing under pressure and winning the tournament should mean your the best a t that given moment however lets say a new country is formed...... Where do they get scaled? They have starting playing, and are quickly rising the rankings, many people believe they are #1 (which I do) are they discredited because they have only just now joined the league?
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 02:49:28


Master Turtle 
Level 62
Report
Arun has ""My Favorite"" list right now.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 03:12:00


ChrisCMU 
Level 61
Report
I did not make a ranking. I just re-tiered pulseys based on his ratings as JSA said.

Turtle contact Ineffable about WSOW, he is running that.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 04:46:29

Good Kid 
Level 56
Report
@Inca Your argument is nonsense.

Replace every game with a best of 7. then the winner is much more confidently the best, until then the winner is often just the person who got the luckiest when it mattered the most.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 06:13:32

JSA 
Level 60
Report
The first season of the clan league, p beat apex. Did that make p the better clan? Hell no. P simply performed better in one league(apex got booted). Last clan league, I believe apex also got booted in a few games. Combine that with the fact that their two new players are their best two, and they're a completely different clan. All the clan league last season told us is wg performed better than apex and wm in it, and also proved to the community that wg can compete with and even beat the top few clans. One higher finish doesn't suddenly make them better. Was militarymaniac the best strategic 1v1 player when he was ranked #1? Was wg the best clan when they finished the clan league ranked #1? Those questions are pretty much the same. Just taking #1 doesn't make you a really good player, but if you also win major tournaments, take other #1's, perform well in leagues, etc., then we could say you are a really good player. Same with wg. Don't get me wrong, I like wg, and at the very least, I would rank them #4. But to say they are the best clan because of one finish in which 20 didn't even compete in is silly.
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 06:15:47


[WM] Gnuffone 
Level 60
Report
when next CL will start?
Pulsey's clan rankings and ratings #3!: 8/24/2014 09:06:38


Incaman
Level 58
Report
@ Good Kid

Like i said i don't follow the leagues here. Often a leagues are played as round-robin, but if it was a single-elimination then i guess there is more luck involved. However that doesn't take away from WGs' accomplishment does it. Best of 7? played in one day or during a week or a month. By your argument i could just say the loser was having a bad day, or a bad week or that in best of 10 they would win and that the competition didn't matter. Don't try to sound like a sore loser (didn't even know if you participated) or maybe a jealousy is at work here. Give the guys some credit for what they accomplished.

@JSA

Now that's a much better argument :D. In the end did WG boot apex? did they make 20 not participate? ( i have no idea who militaryman is by the way :D )

Now i do agree with all of you on many points considering competitions and their format and that you have to be overall good not just in one competition ( not with you Good Kid you always offer the worst arguments ;) ). But saying their victory didn't matter is not right.
Posts 61 - 73 of 73   <<Prev   1  2  3  4