<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 8 of 8   
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 01:11:17


TBest 
Level 60
Report
We just got this template voted into QM!

warriors 10FFA 35/85

That is right, a 10 player ffa. I foresee that it can be hard to get matches here, since even 3v3 RoR (or EU) and 2v2 Strategic is hard to get games on. In fact, I have 1 team game from all my QM games (so way less then 1% chance for me). Hopefully, it's more team-games in MD but I think in both cases we should perhaps make some adjustments to make team-games/FFA's more likely.

Not sure what the best way to achieve this is, but figured I should make a thread at least.

EDIT: Wild idea, but maybe let players (or even auto-games that rotate between the templates?) create QM games that show up in/as open games? Give them an icon to show that it's a rated QM game?

Edited 1/25/2019 01:17:16
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 01:13:18

Алексей
Level 62
Report
I agree.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 01:15:17


ps 
Level 60
Report
for multiday is somewhat easy to solve, for RT it wouldn't be nice to wait longer time for the possibility to get a very rate FFA imho.

i honestly think QM should only be for 1v1. but that's me.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 06:45:24


Timinator • apex 
Level 64
Report
maybe seperate 1v1 and team/ffa games and have their own voting areas.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 07:32:17

Nemo 
Level 63
Report
In MD QM 2v2 or 3v3 is not a problem at all. I used to have max 5 matches almost always. RT is really rare.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 07:55:24


89thlap
Level 61
Report
We just got this template voted into QM!

warriors 10FFA 35/85

That template has been in the top 40 forever no? I'd say for more than half a year. It even used to be among the top 20 if I remember correctly. Other than that, I do agree. It seems unlikely to ever get a 10 player FFA to start. So either get rid of all FFA and team templates in QM voting or change the matching algorithm in some way to make it more likely to match up on a template with 3 or more players.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/25/2019 08:35:14

Olja 
Level 61
Report
That template has been in the top 40 forever no? I'd say for more than half a year.


Indeed this template has been in the top 40 (and even higher) for a while.

I once deselected all other templates to increase the matching probability. After 30 minutes I gave up...

So yes, a differentiation of 1v1 and 3+ players templates in QM would be good.
QM Multiple (2+) Players Templates: 1/26/2019 02:09:07


TBest 
Level 60
Report
That template has been in the top 40 forever no? I'd say for more than half a year. It even used to be among the top 20 if I remember correctly.


Oh, it must have dropped out and been voted in again then. The global chat said that it just got voted in :P
Posts 1 - 8 of 8