The age restriction should likewise be increased , I don't believe an 18 year old has enough stake in a country to influence it. At the least 21+ should be the minimum but 28-38 starting range might be more apt.

democracy is cool it lets me jerk off to hentai

right, so if Jim is considered a "high IQ individual" then, uh...

I hardly talk to anybody at school let alone girls, except for one-word commands and acknowledgements of my existence. I can't remember the last time I've held a conversation with a girl, or anyone outside of my close circle of two friends really. I'm shy, I sit in the corner alone and stare at people.

this is why IQ is a shit measure of indicating superiority.

I'd consider myself fairly smart/bright. I really don't have issues talking to girls or anyone, but I am terribly shy.

I'm very easy with talking to women, there is only one problem. Whenever I talk to a woman I find attractive, there sudenly comes sperm out of my penis, and that sucks so much. Because my underwear gets all sticky and this happens almost on a daily basis.

IQ as superiority... I have a towering IQ compared to the rest of my class and apparently some of them are afraid to go to certain lessons with me because they're scared I'll try and kill them.

Ask yourself: If a dictator rose to power in a western country, will they continue to care about the population and fund healthcare, welfare, public transport, etc or be like most powerful people (like big corporations) and try to exploit the population at all cost?

Mussolini's selling point was literally f*cking keeping the trains on time

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rear-window-making-italy-work-did-mussolini-really-get-the-trains-running-on-time-1367688.html

Don't lie, Smedley. You can't fucking fool me!

You should be proudful that you don't get girls.

~ Tabby Juggernaut, 2017

You should be proudful that you don't get girls.

tabby plz

Then you have a retarded definition of evil.

No: Different matters should held different weight in the vote of any individual person - In the current model of democracy my vote weights the same as a nuclear scientist or as a suicide bomber. It just makes no sense, whenever I vote I am trying to make sure I know which political party's agenda fits my views the most, whilst majority of my friends vote based on feelings and labels.

look at an IQ bell curve and ask yourself if it makes sense to invite literally every adult to participate in politics

what do you mean exactly? however, if you think politics/democracy/elections is an exclusive club for people with high IQ you are probably confusing politics/democracy/elections with tyranny/dictatorship? However this is not how democracy works.

Best proof is your incredibly unintelligent recent dipshit president. =D

I've heard the same statement from a few "progressives" on this site. Proof that the plague of elitism infects both sides of the political spectrum.

Paugers. I know you are just an average troll and dont care much about a reasonable conversation. However I didnt make any of these statements, even though a state, which excludes parts of the citizens from politics due to their race, genetics or IQ level shows characteristics of tyranny.

Edited 6/20/2017 17:00:58

AI is heresy and everyone knows it. I will destroy any on sight, as will countless others.

^^ Destroy Warlight then.

That would be terrible if you would enforce your own rules Tabby.

Cats will destroy the world. Go peafowls.

The thing is, i don't like Felines.