Possible finishes for Cl9 Q1:

1-3: FCC
1-3: Hydra
1-3: ACME
4-5: Poon Squad
4-5: FBG
6: Olympus

There was an error in matchmaking - Guderian was supposed to be replaced by me in the 1v1 Old Strat ME. This was confirmed by beren-apex on 2/12/2017 15:04:03
Master of the Dead was informed on 2/12/2017 13:13:04 but didn't respond.

Why haven't you brought this up for over a month?

As far as I can see, the substitution was carried out on 2/12/2017 10:59:11( GMT-8). These are all the games created on Strat ME for FBG.

02/06/2017 - 18:57:17	12862249  Group Q1 - 1v1 : Old Strat ME	ACME	        FBG	ACME
02/06/2017 - 18:57:24	12862251  Group Q1 - 1v1 : Old Strat ME	FBG	        HYDRA	HYDRA
02/14/2017 - 17:07:18	12917914  Group Q1 - 1v1 : Old Strat ME	FBG	        FCC	FCC
02/16/2017 - 23:10:04	12933608  Group Q1 - 1v1 : Old Strat ME	Olympus	        FBG	FBG
02/20/2017 - 02:01:33	12954793  Group Q1 - 1v1 : Old Strat ME	Poon Squad	FBG	FBG

You have played in all games after the date of substitution. Guderian will obviously be invited to the games prior to the substitution. What is the error in matchmaking?

Re: ACME non join, can i get more detail on "someone on their side forgets to join the game against Olympus, meaning they take a huge 5 point blow they could have easily avoided."
What game & what person so I can take them out back and beat them senseless?

** Actually I see above that its 3v3 Deadman's Rome? I'm on that 3v3 team and guarantee you that we didnt miss a join.

Please advise.

Edited 2017-03-20 00:21:04

Actually I see above that its 3v3 Deadman's Rome? I'm on that 3v3 team and guarantee you that we didnt miss a join.

Please advise.

I looked into this, and we have a bug in the CLOT. A loss was awarded to ACME incorrectly. It should have been awarded to Olympus instead.

The game was created on 03/15/2017 - 10:51:56. Aura's update was on 3/17/2017 16:14:25, and the game was already deleted. Game deletion was not due to a non-join, as that doesn't kick in until 3 days have elapsed since game creation.

We have a player(https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=3953087568) on the Olympus team who has not unlocked all the features on 3v3 Deadman's Rome. The minimum level for this template is 45, and the player is still 39. The player was actually brought in as a substitute on 2/10/2017 17:22:25.

Since game creation failed, the CLOT deletes the game and assigns the loser based on the player unable to join this game. There was a bug in this logic, which has now been fixed. I have also given the win to ACME instead. Sorry about that.

Edited 2017-03-20 08:37:24

That's some awesome and fast issue-dealing, gratz for your work !

Olympus vs FBG is the same story, isn't it?

Thank you!

When I get an opportunity, I will correct the scores as well.

Olympus vs FBG is the same story, isn't it?

Yes. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed this too.

Corrected Horse Race:



Corrected Data Summary:



This makes Olympus more dire... three points, total, in CL9. Words cannot even describe...

Edited 2017-03-21 03:03:06

#PrayForOlympus

Poor Olympus. 1-23 is a very notable score, but not for the right reasons :(.

So I guess I'll kind of rip the Band-Aid off here.

So, up until now anyone that wanted to participate in Clan League could participate in Clan League. Even if it brought nothing to the competition and was kind of a waste of time for everyone. I mean, shouldn't there be a minimum bar for competing? Olympus this season is on the same level of Darklords in CL7. It is near impossible to police clans when they sign up for clan league, but maybe if clans aren't taking this seriously shouldn't be allowed to return until they do take it seriously. And a cooling off period might be a good idea. Because I don't know how Olympus participating is benefiting anyone.

At this point, Olympus has put an inactive player in their lineup at the beginning of the season, then replaced them with a player that did not meet the minimum level requirements of the template. If you don't read the rules, which aren't hard to, then its hard to see why Olympus should play next season.

In my opinion, a clan that gets booted a lot and screws up with their lineups and such can be forced to either take it more serious or be thrown out for the next season. However, a clan not being able to keep up with the others from a strategic point of view should not be punished for that imo.

We should give Olympus props, they won 1 game more than expected. Just kidding ;). In all seriousness though, I agree that a clan should be somewhat serious going to Clan League.

Edited 2017-03-21 23:49:07

-my bad-

Edited 2017-03-22 00:52:19

FCC should be the winners of Guiroma 2v2 since we have the head to head vs. Hydra right?

ACME will probably end 4-1 aswell in Guiroma 2v2 so no :P

regarding Olympus, i don't see what the problem is.

The format of this new CL rather encourages strategic line-ups.
I would imagine that Olympus looked at the format and decided to totally punt this first round, giving them a much better chance of performing well in the D division.

I'm sure there are teams that have used their best players in an effort to qualify to division C.
You may well find that Olympus will perform much better in the next stage whilst one or two others will struggle.