It would be advantageous for any country that is not Saudi Arabia or the Islamic State to have Trump be the president rather than Hillary.

Really? I`d say that most European Countries will not benefit from Trump. I might even say most countries allied with the US won`t have a real advantage if Trump gets ellected.

When your allies are actively supporting one candidate and your adversaries are agitating for the other, it's time to take a step back and think about why that might be.

Then take a second step back and ask "why are these guys my allies/adversaries again?" and notice something's awfully off.

Eh democracies tend to ally each other EU/US while authoritarian regimes like to avoid being too cuzzy with democratic ones (it's a general rule, don't start to give counter examples!). I totally see why Russia would support Trump when it comes to that.

The 20 first economies after the US want to have Hillary as the US president; the only exception is Russia. Electing Trump will not only definetly not make your country great again (his economy policies are nothing but stupid, he defends a police state and not saying the poor example he is to people) but will probably finish the decline of America. Hillary is also a poor choice, but it makes more sense economically, diplomatically and not being a sexual predator-wise. But hey you could have nominated Bernie or Kasich, both reasonable and undoubtfully better than these clowns.

The most corrupt politician in history vs the most dangerous psychopath

Never thought I'd say this......I miss 2012

( I honestly hate everything about Bernie Sanders economic plans but I would have voted for him over this clown )

Edited 10/13/2016 16:06:18

I have a really bad feeling Trump might not leave. He will keep coming counting on the idiotic realm of the party to nominate him. If the party doesn't learn from this asshole not to nominate mentally unstable lizards, I'm cutting all ties. I've had it. I'm sick of getting looked down upon by stuck up evangelicals and trying not to strangle the southern rednecks with the IQ of 5.

Previously Republicans were very much for free trade, whereas trump is constantly bashing it as "taking away jobs".

Were they? You likely know better than me, but it seems like shielded trade is something all conserves like.

It would be advantageous for any country that is not Saudi Arabia or the Islamic State to have Trump be the president rather than Hillary.

Who says even Arabia would mind, just America worsening itself.

However, bigger military is something that many smaller lands will mind much about. I bet all OPEC that is not allied with America really doesn't want Trump.

democracies tend to ally each other EU/US while authoritarian regimes

As they say, evil loves evil. But "democracy" ok.

decline of America

what?

Edited 10/13/2016 18:05:47

Were they? You likely know better than me, but it seems like shielded trade is something all conserves like.

That's pretty much not true. Take for example the vote on NAFTA:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/s395

In both the house and the senate more democrats voted against NAFTA then for it, whereas over 75% of republicans supported it.

The 20 first economies after the US want to have Hillary as the US president; the only exception is Russia

Wrong Trump has a Chinese heart and is a follower of Deng Xaoiping

Actually that's not accurate. Historically, take a look at the Hoover congress for example. Republicans have actually been very in favor of the tariff and protectionism. Hoover was a progressive Republican At the time, and it showed in trade and agriculture.

Historically, take a look at the Hoover congress for example.

Come on, this was a time when alcohol was banned and when democrats supported segregation. "Historically" literally has no relevance when discussing long-term issues like this.

Republicans and Democrats effect nothing, only the Jews control politics

wrong, it's the reptilians, who disguise themselves as the most convenient race depending on geography. sometimes they're white, black, jewish, asian, etc.

Edited 10/14/2016 02:13:22

"Sadly this is the truth. Literally any other Republican would be able to mop the floor with Clinton right now."

I doubt that. They might make for a closer election, but you seem to think she's a lot less popular than she actually is.

She's not popular at all. Along with Trump she has some of the highest negative ratings in recent politics.

She's far less popular than Obama.
Less popular than Gore.
Heck, even Kerry was looked on more favorably in his run

Edited 10/14/2016 04:13:53

Of course it does. Trump is the nominee because he won a popularity contest. Even if he isn't, you can't deny that millions of people vote for the person and not the policies.

When did Paugers become Nazi Alex Jones?

^Mein Kampf is pure fact?

Also I wonder how the Jews are the weakest race on earth, yet they control everything even as a minority.

Alex Jones makes assumptions, I base my statements on Karl's Ramblings

So Jews are the master race.

it's idiotic to think I completely base my statements on fact and logic. It's mostly based on what the race of the person my mother decided to bang that week.

Good point