I can't handle 2 email accounts at once, elect me as your president - Clinton




ClintonForElectricChair2k16

Edited 8/26/2016 20:39:48

Funny how Trumpettes want their politically incorrect free speech -- but only when you're saying something they agree with. When they disagree with you, they turn into spoiled children who want a safe space Trumpjerk with no dissenting opinions.

Sorry kids, free speech works both ways. If you can go around advocating that inept moron be the next President, I can celebrate the fact that you'll never get your way and the next President of the United States will be Hillary Clinton.

I respect your right to display whatever "propaganda" you want. However, I do not respect the media's right to be both controlled by the government and corporations and be completely biased. Fox News and CNN are two sides of the same coin, it's not Right vs Left, it's Establishment vs Anti-Establishment.

I did not have textual relations with that private server.

Clinton also accused Trump of being controlled by the Kremlin.

He definitely cooperates with them.

She is a legitimate criminal who has escaped being punished because of her last name. I would sooner vote for Vermin Supreme than a reckless criminal.

So you will vote Trump, who says that international warfare law will only get in the way, and wants to make war crimes as official policy? I mean, c'mon off it, every American president since maybe the 1960s has been a war crimer.

She wants a war with Russia; deal breaker right there

If you count up her forecasted death count with Trump's, I think it would still be lower.

She's mentally unfit to be president.

More fit than Trump...this is a man who totally denies global warming as a hoax. Not even right thinktanks say that; they just dispute the how wrecking it is and how much of it is manmande. It's a shame that folk still fall for fascist/authoritarian empty mottos and exaggerations like this. You could find 60% of anything memorable he says on a propoganda poster from the 1950s or before.

"Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism, I don't want congrats, I want toughness & vigilance." (after the Orlando shootings)

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c6/04/41/c60441b6bae2bb901aa89caf147441dc.jpg;

"I will fight for their security, I will fight for their jobs, I will fight for their families. One American Nation."

http://www.pozdravleniya.biz/images/sovetskie_plakati_vtoraya_mirovaya_001.jpg (the motherland calls)

"They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists."

"Nothing has affected me more deeply than the time I have spent with the mothers and fathers who have lost their children to violence spilling across our border."

"We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities."

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/uglich_jj/22518204/683659/683659_original.jpg

"We're a nation that speaks English. I think that, while we're in this nation, we should be speaking English... that's how we assimilate."

http://i.stack.imgur.com/iqBYV.jpg

"I’m with you – the American people. I am your voice. ... I’m With You, and I will fight for you, and I will win for you."

"I will fight for their security, I will fight for their jobs, I will fight for their families. One American Nation."

http://67.media.tumblr.com/d0d40ffd886fee7be3aa6471bd42bf32

"We're going to protect Christianity, and I can say that. I don't have to be politically correct. We're going to protect it. I hear this is a major theme right here, but two Corinthians, 3:17, that's the whole ball game. Where the spirit of the lord, right, where the spirit of the lord is, there is liberty, and here there is Liberty College, but Liberty University, but it is so true. You know, when you think -- and that's really -- is that the one? Is that the one you like? I think that's the one you like because I loved it, and it's so representative of what's taken place. But we are going to protect Christianity. And if you look what's going on throughout the world, you look at Syria where if you're Christian, they're chopping off heads. You look at the different places, and Christianity, it's under siege."

http://www.crazywebsite.com/Free-Galleries-01/USA_Patriotic/Pictures_WWII_Posters_LG/Vintage_WWII_Patriotic_Posters_United_States_America_Nazi_2LG.jpg

"When our sailors were captured last week, I said that's one of the saddest things that I have seen when those young people were on their hands and knees in a begging position with their hands up and thugs behind them with guns, and then we talk like it's OK. It's not OK. It's lack of respect. We can't let that happen to this country. It's lack of respect."

https://uglichjj.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/6.jpg

Fox News and CNN are two sides of the same coin, it's not Right vs Left, it's Establishment vs Anti-Establishment.

The anti-establishment? You mean what's not more or less two parties with the same goals of world domination and citoyen enslaving? That's not Donald Trump.

Edited 8/26/2016 22:11:32

it's not Right vs Left, it's Establishment vs Anti-Establishment.

That's not right, at least not yet. if it truly was, then Bernie voters would have actually moved to Trump and not Hillary.

also, it's funny how he thinks a wall will do anything xD topkeks

uh 'Murica, if you could, like, actually release a good main presidential canditate that doesn't feel like choosing between two lesser evils that would be great.

tbh those two make Obama look like a really decent president, that means something.

^

Bernie voters would have actually moved to Trump and not Hillary.

Some of them did, the anti-establishment ones.

it's not Right vs Left, it's Establishment vs Anti-Establishment.

Right vs Left is the battle taking place within the 'Establishment' group. Most of whom don't take the 'Anti-Establishment' group seriously.

If you count up her forecasted death count with Trump's, I think it would still be lower.

How many folk will die in the wars Trump wants? Well, the only war he really wants is against ISIS. He talks a lot of talk about breaking international law, but those generals are going to still be apart of the mostly neocon establishment, and will oppose him on lots of things, and do things their own way. So in general, his war crime wants will probably go without heed from the military. He does want to put more soldiers in Syria, but that'll take months, and it's entirely possible ISIS will be mostly defeated by the time it's feasible. So his killings will be most likely, equal to Clinton in Daesh. Now, Clinton wants to do more than just defeat ISIS; she wants to overthrow Assad, and that'll kill tens of thousands if not millions, and that's not even counting the resulting world war.

tbh those two make Obama look like a really decent president, that means something.

Tbh, I don't even like Gary Johnson, I'm only supporting him because I dislike Clinton and Trump more.

How many folk will die in the wars Trump wants? Well, the only war he really wants is against ISIS.

He wants war against radic Islaam, as he says. So Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and perhaps he'll grow his business of evil into Nigeria. But wars is one thing, letting folk die from easily preventable deeds is not ok. 1.5x (let's say America brought about indirectly or directly 1/10 folk in every war - so 15 000 each year x1.5 is 23 000.)

But the biggest killer by far is sucking corporatist dick for cheapness over safety. Air pollution directly kills millions each year. In America, it's not so bad - about 400k folk die each year from it. And say Trump will x1.5 this number (600 000).

Clinton, with the ongoing wars, let's say 1.2x: 18 000.

Clinton with environmental regulation: /1.5 = 300 000

So Trump: ~ 600 000
Clinton: ~ 300 000

this bit gets speculative. How likely is it that they'll start a new terrible world war? Trump refuses to rule out core warfare in Europe, while Clinton refuses Russia and Choson. Frankly I think it's more likely Trump will start something. He's clearly terrible at foreign diplomacy (https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/04/17/donald-trump-us-president-russia/). And then, is it even going to be big or is going to be something like the Kargil War (against two foes that hated each other more than America hates Russia)?

And what would be the death count? Very speculative. Clinton just seems to be doing the same Obama is, which is bad, but Obama is decent (or "cowardly") enough just to put sanctions on Russia and be done with it.

He wants war against radic Islaam

He wants war with radic Islaamist dreadknights, and even if he only said radic Islaam, that's a very loose meaning, and would likely not expand outside of Clinton's war on radic Islaam.

Trump refuses to rule out core warfare in Europe,

What war is there for him to join in Europe? He's not going to fight Russia, so there's no place for him to do core warfare.

But the biggest killer by far is sucking corporatist dick for cheapness over safety. Air pollution directly kills millions each year. In America, it's not so bad - about 400k folk die each year from it. And say Trump will x1.5 this number (600 000).

Trump has never proposed striking down the Clean Air Act

this bit gets speculative. How likely is it that they'll start a new terrible world war?

Clinton wants direct conflict with Russia's ally, Assad, Russia has drawn a clear line in the sand for America, and so has China, as both countries now support Assad directly through training, weapons and air support. Any conflict with Assad will produce conflict with Russia and China, as there are Russian and Chinese assets in Assad controlled Syria.

Trump wants direct conflict with Daesh, and could probably cooperate with Russia/China and Assad without antagonizing either.

He's clearly terrible at foreign diplomacy

Russians love him, other folk hate him; so what, we'd love that Conservative party bloke in Russia for trying to join the Euroband and hate Zhirnovsky for being a new Hitler.

And then, is it even going to be big or is going to be something like the Kargil War (against two foes that hated each other more than America hates Russia)?

Well let's see:

Kargil War:

A conflict between a large force trying to regain control over a small mountainous territory against a small paramilitary force.

American-Russo War: US invasion from Estonia and Latvia into the Pskov region and then to Petrograd and Moskva. Russia has had drills where it's clear they're telling American soldiers to stop the invasion, and already has a CSTO rapid reaction force, and created another reaction force in 2015.

And what would be the death count? Very speculative.

1984; constant war.

It doesn't take a lot to know that Obama was a good president. Even most of you GOP fangirls can agree that these 8 years would've been a lot worse under Romney's greasy Mitts.

Fuck this thread, but do you Hillary shills just not care that a) she loved Robert Byrd and b) a KKK Grand Wizard just said he likes her?

I'm not going to go into long threads.

Does Syria matter that much to Russia (and China tsh barely involved in the war at all - even Belarus is a bigger military supplier to Syria than China).

Also Trump speaks against environmentism, is for shutting down the American Environmental Protection Agency, saying that "business first", and his advisor to environment believes in pretty much everything that he says, if not worse. He probably hasn't talked about or been asked about Clean Air Deed since it's too specific and unknown to America.

He's bad with diplomacy, he doesn't like compromises with foes, and really I don't get what you say with Kargil War, American-Russian war might end up the same as the Korean War - sure it wrecked Korea, but it didn't wreck China nor America. And this is only the second war of core strengths, the other been the Soviet-Chinese border wars, about as bloody.

It doesn't take a lot to know that Obama was a good president.

Yeah, I agree, Obama was great, I especially love how he went on where Bush left off.

It doesn't take a lot to know that Obama was a good president. Even most of you GOP fangirls can agree that these 8 years would've been a lot worse under Romney's greasy Mitts.

It doesn't take a lot to know that Obama was another authoritarian in a long line of authoritarian leaders, making little improvements while promising bread and peace for all, while taking the bread from you and sending your children to war. He gaols truth sayers, murders recklessly and without abandon, and has kept up a policy of slavery for folk who break his corrupt rules, like criminalizing marijuana. Stop making excuses for fascists.

Does Syria matter that much to Russia (and China tsh barely involved in the war at all - even Belarus is a bigger military supplier to Syria than China).

China is starting to train Syrian troops, and of course it matters to Russia; they have to stop the NATO war machine somewhere before it has engulfed Russia on all sides.

Also Trump speaks against environmentism, is for shutting down the American Environmental Protection Agency, saying that "business first", and his advisor to environment believes in pretty much everything that he says, if not worse. He probably hasn't talked about or been asked about Clean Air Deed since it's too specific and unknown to America.

Assuming he would even be able to undo the EPA, he's still for raising taxes on the rich, raising the minimum wage, and protectionism. Lots of industry in America will likely leave under his stupidity.

He's bad with diplomacy, he doesn't like compromises with foes

Lots of folk don't, doesn't mean they're not eventually forced to.

and really I don't get what you say with Kargil War

Kargil War was over a small patch of land, and Pakistan was only dedicated to sending a small paramilitary group to do it. A US NATO war would be over much larger tracts of land, making it very easy to escalate into full blown war.

American-Russian war might end up the same as the Korean War - sure it wrecked Korea, but it didn't wreck China nor America

Russia has more than a hundred million folk; wrecking Russian kills millions.

And this is only the second war of core strengths, the other been the Soviet-Chinese border wars, about as bloody.

China didn't invade Mongolia to change it to Maoist.

Yeah, I agree, Obama was great, I especially love how he went on where Bush left off.

Sending tens of thousands of soldiers to Poland: Great!

Obama was not great, he killed Harambe.

Think about it, there were 12 gorillas before Obama, now theres 11. RIP Harambe

#ObamadidHarambe
#TrumpTrain
#Trump2016
#MakeAmericaGreatAgain
#Hillaryforprison