I would rather consider that for the most part, my map has the upper hand in the fact that it's much less eurocentric than world nations, particularly in Africa and south america.
For Example, World nations only gives Sudan 1 territory, Whereas on my map it has 11. This is pretty much the case for any african nation, which with few exceptions like DRC and Nigeria are only represented with either one or two territories on world nations.
I think that Africa was already over-represented in most sites (but under-represented in some others, like Nigeria). The problem with World Nations 2014, also, was that it included these (more) god-useless islands and overpowered them.
World Nations 2012 was also sucky about balance, but it's way easier to change - it's 300 lands, not 1,100.
A list I made a while ago of 20 countries over/undereperesented in the map. Maybe I'll do one for your map, too. (-) = too few territories, (+) = too many
World Nations 2012:
Hanguk: ---- (most underepresented country - just one land?)
East Asia: -
North Asia: +
Middle East: Ok
North Africa: +
South Africa: +
North America: Ok
Middle America: Ok
South America: -
Edited 4/15/2016 22:47:04