ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 08:48:09 |
NewWorldOrder
Level 58
Report
|
ill be the first to guess just another troll clan?
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 13:13:33 |
Daisuke Jigen
Level 56
Report
|
If players do not play, the number of members makes no difference. You could have 1 or 100 inactives/alts/forum trolls and you would still be the lowest. Try playing the game rather than flaunting your 'no requirements' policy which you, no doubt, have. With your vast numbers you should at least move up to second last. I know this is a big jump, but do not worry! You have the forum's support. You just have to believe in yourself...
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 13:18:19 |
Ska2D2
Level 55
Report
|
Of course they have the lowest rank. They've only just bought the clan slot. They were hardly likely to start off with more points than the other clans have collected so far.
If they have popped out of no where so what? They are recruiting a large number of people? Oh Noez!
Warlight has a clan system now, warlight ranks clans this kind of shocking behavoir where people make clans and recruit people is going to happen.
Edit. @ righ you might want to think up a better title for yourself 'grand wizard' has very bad connotations.
Edited 10/5/2013 13:22:54
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 13:23:35 |
Daisuke Jigen
Level 56
Report
|
As far as I'm aware it does not matter how long you have had the clan for. The order is determined by the cumulative amount of points your members have stacked up.
Edit: Righ. Grand Wizard of The Illuminati. Former Lightning Clan Leader. Need I say more?
Edited 10/5/2013 13:25:34
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 13:24:52 |
Jehovah
Level 59
Report
|
clan rankings are undated every 24 hours. the reason you see this clan at the bottom is because clan was created toda- and rankings have not updated yet.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 14:20:27 |
Seahawks
Level 54
Report
|
sighs, illumanti is just lightning clan reborn, the shittiest clan ever made that recruited any person who wasnt good enough for any other clan, which since there too many low pre-req clans, a lot of people
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 14:26:31 |
Jehovah
Level 59
Report
|
typical seahawks, bullying anyone that he thinks is inferior to him...
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 14:57:28 |
Ska2D2
Level 55
Report
|
I was disagreeing with you therefore obviously trolling. That's the definition of trolling now right?
If the clan is fun for the players and they learn from or enjoy the experience of being in the clan, what is wrong with there being clans for everyone.
No one here is under any obligation to join them. And if you feel so strongly against low req clans you should be merry that you can more easily identify the players through their clan tags and avoid them.
Warlighters, Regl and 101st were all at one point attacked for the things most of the commentators here find so rephrensible in this clan. Namely they had lower pre-reqs than other clans at the time or peope thought there leaders weren't good enough to join an existing clan, nevermind lead one. They all three, seem to be doing better now, and I'd guess people in those clans would say they learned with their clan.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 15:11:07 |
যুদ্ধ
Level 10
Report
|
কোন এক একটি বিষ্ঠা দেয়, আপনি এত অহংকারী এবং সব কাজ করার প্রয়োজন হবে না.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 15:49:46 |
Taishō
Level 57
Report
|
That's why I was wondering if you were trolling Ska, since my statements where neutral facts combined with questions...what were you disagreeing with?
Btw, maybe it's just me, but inviting someone who already has a clan and then sending a second invitation after said person with a clan has already declined, is considered rude. Just saying.
Now to what you were saying: Clans like the Warlighters and 101st had low pre-reqs in the beginning, sure, but I don't think they ever had no pre-reqs.
I mean, this isn't 1880s America: come as you are, or modern day EU: everyone welcome. It's a strategic game and a clan's reputation hangs on two major factors. 1. Good players or 2. Active players willing to learn. If you have 40+ members after 1-2 days, with no system structure, how well do you think that clan will function? It looks like an attempt to make a brand, rather than a functioning clan, IMO.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 16:12:40 |
Ska2D2
Level 55
Report
|
Your opinion has nothing to do with it though.
If people want to join a clan, or make a clan it's their decision what kind of a clan that will be. I'm not commentating on what kind of clan is the best.
I'm saying live and let live when it doesn't negatively affect you. And this doesn't.
You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist over the fact that I'm not agreeing with the general comments of "n00b tr1b3", "must be da trollz new tribe", "i hate the leader therefore i hate this tribe" or "your tribes sh1t if your not full of 1337 players"
Don't take it personally that I hold a different opinion and say so on a forum.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/5/2013 18:56:42 |
wjackson
Level 48
Report
|
I don't like that they are called clans! Can we change it to Fun Bunches or maybe Strategery Buddies?
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/6/2013 07:34:39 |
Daisuke Jigen
Level 56
Report
|
Partners in Crime.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/6/2013 09:15:41 |
Cheery Dog
Level 57
Report
|
Apparently changing the account name is reason enough a secondary invite. I may have peeked into your tribe the first time and found nothing, but if people have declined, we're not going to be interested being invited a second time either.
|
ILLUMINATI CLAN & A Question: 10/6/2013 17:58:11 |
NewWorldOrder
Level 58
Report
|
^ trolls attract trolls
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|