If you play 1v1 games and score 70-80%, you are good. If you score 80%+, you are probably farming.

If you play 3v3 Eu games, and score 65-75%, you are good. If you score over 75%, you are probably farming.

If your combined game count for 1v1, 2v2 and 3v3 games is lower than your combined game count for everything else, then you probably aren't a strategic player and thus shouldn't worry.

You're welcome.

Edited 12/29/2015 16:01:28

So I'm crap?

^
Yes but we get the attendance award

How can someone, who hides their stats, tell us about stats?

ppl still farm stats? i thought that died with the Elite clan.

Hypocrite shite

I'm not good. My win rates for 1v1 and 3v3 stand at 50-60%.

Edited 12/29/2015 16:55:30

Why would you censor your stats , no-ones gonna make fun of you by that....

Depends on your competition and gets less and less accurate over time (compare people's stats with those on their alts).

You're really only as good as the players you can compete against and win about half the time. No better measure than a ladder rating that corresponds to a consistent 45-55% local win rate.

Yup, ladder ratings are near perfect tools for measuring sb's abbilities. Unfortunately they are restricted to few templates used therefore they don't take into account player's abilities in different kind of games like big team games (for instance 4v4v4v4) or FFA's.... But this is rather the problem of limited number of ladders....

Edited 12/29/2015 17:53:09

If your 1vs1, 2vs2 and 3vs3 stat is 0-10 % you are one of the best. If your stat is 100 -130 % you should play a other game.

As Kain says, ladder ratings are accurate, but narrow.

Win rates are near-meaningless - they only tell you how you compare to the people you play frequently.

Edit: though 3+-team games (or FFAs) are so different than games with 2 teams (or 2 players) that it might as well be a different game, since diplomacy becomes paramount.

Edited 12/29/2015 18:57:08

Whoa what is meant by the term 'farming'? because if it means creating an alt to continuously beat then i disagree i try to make sure i don't play the same person twice.

Farming is when you deliberately try to match up against bad opponents to boost your win rate. You can play with an alt, but that goes against the rules of WarLight.

EDIT: 70-80%? Against good players? That's quite high. I think if you can beat good players at least half to 70% of the time, that qualifies you as good. Unless you are talking about elite players, which in that case 70-80% is a decent range.

Edited 12/29/2015 19:02:55

So that would tie into points? You could tell by comparing the amount of wins to their points earned or level.

Not necessarily. Chances are, if you play bad opponents, they will be within the range of levels 1 - 30, which won't give you many points. Playing Real-Time games (which is the most common way to farm) doesn't give you a point boost either.

Well i don't farm but my 1v1 stats are decent i wouldn't say i'm very good but only played auto games so got to know the template. Does that make me a bad player?

Don't get how anyone can have fun playing auto games with 90%+ of players there are noobs.

Hmm i wanted to pratice for the RT ladder and obviously being a low level i couldn't replicate the templates so i thought joining auto games would atleast get me used to the cards and countering.

Could just play the 10 coin entry fee coin games