can pls someone excplain to me .. in the cycle move order suppose to be anywhere ... something to saw the move order of the players ?

you should try to reqwrite your question because is not very clear for me what you want to know about 3v3 ladder cycle moves and what's you don't understand about it.

i think he is asking to see which move order he has on a turn and where he can see it. You are confusing cycle move order with no luck cycle move order. With no luck cycle move order the game tells you which move order you have while you have to figure it out yourself with normal cycle move order. So in the games of the 3vs3 ladder you have to discover the move order by yourself

He's asking if the move order in 3v3 ladder is displayed, like "You will get 1st/2nd/3rd/etc.. order this turn".

I think.

https://www.warlight.net/wiki/Move_Order

yes

"Cyclic Move Order
If the move order ..... etc ..... the move order is predictable.

You can check what the move-order is for the current turn by mousing over the small purple question mark in your orders sidebar. "


for this i am asking .. it talks about a question mark somewhere and i cant find it .. if it is only for no-luck then they must rewrite the excplanations

Edited 10/19/2015 13:57:47

Under the parts of the game ( deploy,attack,commit) There is
„You will get # order this turn. ?“
But in first turn there isnt,bcs it is cycle

ollie's explaination covers everyhthing

nope is nothing .. mowhere nothing at all

Gnuffone you play in the 3v3 ladder .. is somewhere tells you whem you play 1st 2bd 3rd ?

then master Ryiro they must rewrite the excplanation on cyclic move order is wrong

Edited 10/19/2015 14:10:36

ollies explanation is perfectly fine. you should re-read that chaos. on the 3vs3 ladder it shouldn't Show you what move order you will get. you Need to find out by yourself

hundernd times if i re-read that .. i ll come to the same conclusion ..


https://www.warlight.net/wiki/Move_Order


.........."Cyclic Move Order

If the move order setting for a game is set to "Cycle", the move order works a bit differently. The first turn of a game is randomized just as it would be in the Random Move Order system presented above, but subsequent turns just reverse the order each time. For example: ABCD becomes DCBA the next turn, then returns to ABCD for the third turn. This means that, unlike the random move order, the move order is predictable.

You can check what the move-order is for the current turn by mousing over the small purple question mark in your orders sidebar........."


and nothing else left but to thank you all for answering here

yes i agree with chaos. the wiki is wrong there. It does say you can see it with cycle move order but you can't

i think Chaos is asking where is the "?" in the cyclic move games...as far as i know there's no such thing in only normal cyclic games,and i like it this way

THANK YOU
i really felt so bad ...

but if my memory is well .. this ? was in cycle move games before no-cycle move appears ... im not very sure but i think was excisted .. in all past games with "cycle" ..

Edited 10/19/2015 14:34:23

in cycle games you have to find out the cycle. :) i really like this, in no luck-cycle its too easy :P

So you have to understand how the cycle is based on picks/previous turns and picks you lost. With the territory you see in turn 1 or turn 2 you should Always get full intel. :) or almost :P

mmmm thank you

i told my teammates in 3v3 ladder that i didnt want to join but noooo come they say will be fun !!!

it is fun, best competition ever as fun ;)

mmm i tell you my opinion when we will meet there .. :))

lol

Oh, the wiki used to have it correct. Someone has edited in the mistake. In fact before I edited it the wiki contradicted itself xD.

In cyclic move order, it's up to players to figure out the cycle on their own, but in no-luck cycle, WarLight reveals to all players who will be moving when. To help make it obvious, the game shows exactly who will move on the next turn in the left column:

Was always there, however you had to look under the NLC part. Anyway the description to Cycle is correct now.