<< Back to Clans Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 22 of 22   
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 04:23:10


BanaNa
Level 30
Report
Players in search of a clan to join often post threads in the clan forums looking for an accepting community. What clans would you suggest to the following hypothetical players?

PERSON A
lvl 57
Joined WL: January 2012
"I'm looking for a strategic clan that participates in the clan league and isn't filled with ten year olds."

PERSON B
lvl 34
Joined WL: November 2014
"Ugh! Like I LOVE clan politics! Everything about play-pretend king and queen just gets me all horny! I get abused and bullied in real life so uhh it would totally be my thing to do fake social hierarchies."

PERSON C
lvl 42
Joined WL: February 2015
"I want to get better and improve at the game. My 1v1 record is so embarrassing that I hide all the records of the ranked games on my profile. Help!"

PERSON D
lvl 27
Joined WL: September 2014
"I'm mainly interested in playing diplomacies. Strategic games r like ahh supah booooooring and lame."

PERSON E
lvl 8
Joined WL: October 2015
"Umm not sure if this is the right place to post but how do I change my color??"

PERSON F
lvl 48
Joined WL: March 2013
"Okay so yaaaaaaaaa I'm an unstable gurl with emotional issues. Looking for a totally non-judgmental community."

PERSON G
lvl 19
Joined WL: September 2015
"I'm an anti-homo religious extremists with strong conservative values and I love letting everyone know about them on the forums. I'm also an alt since my main account got suspended for trolling and posting racist hate. Direct me to a good clan y'all."

PERSON H
lvl 52
Joined WL: June 2013
"I have pretty good stats, done well in ladders, and have won multiple tournaments. However I'm semi-retired and not always very active."

Recommend a clan for PERSONS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, & H that you think would be a good fit for them!

Edited 10/5/2015 04:26:12
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 04:34:00


[Wolf] Relmcheatham
Level 56
Report
for the lost wolves...
A-yes-Me and Zeph are planning to join the clan league and we have 1 person who acts like a ten year old... other then him were good
B-no-bit pushy...
C-Mostly- we are nowhere close to being good trainers...however stick around long enough and you will pick up some things.
D-2/5-no comment
E-NOPE
F-4/5- Unless skourby is the welcoming commitee then they would be fine here
G-no=i myself am conservative,antihomo, and am rooted in it, however i unlike this (theoretical person) no how to put it aside and not make hate speeches or troll...
H-YES- basically most of our clan XD houston,semi, and a few others are active on media other then warlight, not to mention that we have skype,kik, and the warlight page for communication if you do go inactive, opening them to a big community should they fully retire

(im not suggesting other clans due to the fact i dont like bashing other clans nor do i feel right to judge clans when i havent personally met the leaders and members)

Edited 10/5/2015 04:34:43
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 04:53:13


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
A: League of Erroneous Applications
B: Lost Wolves
C: League of Erroneous Applications
D: Lost Wolves
E: Lost Wolves
F: Royal Falcons
G: Darklords
H: [WG]

My opinions.
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 04:56:13


[Wolf] Relmcheatham
Level 56
Report
why E for us?
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 05:29:39


L'Esophogas
Level 55
Report
Is this a trick question?

I'm pretty sure all those hypothetical people belong in Darklords
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 07:37:25


[WL] Colonel Harthacanute
Level 51
Report
A - USSR, LEA, Vitrix
B - TLW, Falcons
C - LEA, DARKLORDS
D - USSR, CORPF, TLW, Falcons, Mongols, After_Dark, DARKLORDS
E - DARKLORDS
F - Falcons, T4R
G - Royal Entente, TLW, DARKLORDS
H - Every single clan on WarLight...

Personal opinions.
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 07:53:30

Ryzys
Level 58
Report
A: M'Hunters, Illuminati, 101st, LEA, VS, Icelandic Turtles, WarLighters
B: Darklords, Lost Wolves, Falcons
C: Illuminati, 101st, LEA (stats will be crucial, though)
D: Lost Wolves, CORP, Falcons, {W.U}, Mongols, {rp}
E: Why is this here
F: Poon Squad
G: Darklords
H: 80% of all clans (Well, there is at least one I know of that the owner is banned from WL, so it can't be 100%)
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 14:29:30


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
why E for us?


TLW has loads of noobs, as I remember. You're like Darklords except you don't literally invite everybody, you invite just about everybody.
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 16:16:33


OxTheAutist 
Level 58
Report
A: M'Hunters, CORP, ILLUMINATI, AWF, LEA, {Olympus}, Yin-Yang, TJC
B: The Lost Wolves, The Royal Falcons, Royal Entente
C: ILLUMINATI, CORP, TJC, LEA
D: The Lost Wolves, USSR, The Royal Falcons, Mongols - small% of CORP, TJC.
E: DARKLORDS
F: The Poon Squad
G: Royal Entente, DARKLORDS
H: [20]
What would you suggest?: 10/5/2015 16:19:24


Lolicon love
Level 56
Report
person F seems to miss that the fact that she is on the internet. This is the worst place for non-judgeing even on WL.
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 12:10:22


Fan the Apostle
Level 56
Report
I can coreolate the letters to the players


A=?
B=Kertona
C=MMB
D=A Talking Fan
E=every newbie
F=Lolicon
G=Ion/Tyrion
F=Every Ladder player
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 14:56:42


Lolicon love
Level 56
Report
DAMN YOU.
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 17:16:33


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
I like the idea of this thread (matching a player type to a list of clans).

But, why levels? Levels mean nothing. You can get to level 41 in a few rigged games, as shown on the forums. You should take levels out of your player list and just put skills in there. Something like "win X percent of auto games" or "Rated 1800 on 1v1 ladder" or something tangible because levels are not a measure of skill or activity really.
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 17:19:11


OxTheAutist 
Level 58
Report
Agreed here ^ Levels mean nothing, but newbies often look up to the higher levelled players, despite the fact that a good level 10 could destroy a bad level 50. A good player tends to destroy a bad player, despite levels.

Edited 10/6/2015 17:19:23
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 17:26:35


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Yeah, there could be more indicators too. Like the player prefers 3v3 games. Or the player only likes %0 SR games. Or is solid at 1v1, but would like to find a clan to learn team games.

There are lots of ways to break down the right clan for someone that are more accurate than levels.



I am guessing this was done with real players and that there is some secret motivation here.
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 19:55:42


powerpos
Level 48
Report
Damn, that's a lot of alts you got there.
What would you suggest?: 10/6/2015 23:49:33


Kenny • apex 
Level 59
Report
The top competitive clans atm (WG, GG, Apex) rarely recruit clanless people, just pointing that out. So normally our target are people who perform excellently in tournaments/ladder. It takes awhile to get there, so normally the people recruited are from other clans.
What would you suggest?: 10/7/2015 00:19:01

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
Anyone may also be slightly extreme, my entrance to TLW was beating relm and semice getting auto-booted during a tournament
What would you suggest?: 10/7/2015 02:35:17


[Wolf] Relmcheatham
Level 56
Report
SEMICE! back in your inactivity cage!
What would you suggest?: 10/10/2015 00:05:42


Zephyrum 
Level 60
Report
I couldn't help but think of some names everytime I read one of these. xD
What would you suggest?: 10/10/2015 03:05:48

Jaymer
Level 57
Report
But, why levels? Levels mean nothing. You can get to level 41 in a few rigged games, as shown on the forums.


Levels aren't a perfect indicator of anything, but what is? As imperfect as they are, I think levels do tell you at least roughly how familiar someone is with the game. Does level 60 mean you're better than a level 40? Not at all. But you've probably played more types of games on more maps with a wider variety of settings. Probably. Meanwhile a level 10 probably has a lot to learn, even if they have great natural talent. Of course this is all assuming the accounts aren't multis.

Those who rig games to get levels... well, I assume they're a minority, but at least they know enough to know how to rig the games. Congratulations on deflating an almost meaningless stat.

Edit: Case in point, I'm only level 55, so I didn't know that if you bold and italic something, you have to put the closing tags in the reverse order of the opening tags. ^_^;

Edited 10/10/2015 03:08:21
What would you suggest?: 10/10/2015 03:16:41

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
Eh, Majority of what I know in playing the game strategically evolved from player against other players, so to a certain degree level could be important (I doubt we will see a new player(level 1, not an alt) ever defeat a level 60 in a competitive game), but after a certain point, it just comes down to skill and experience, which levels should show, but as proven commonly don't(I think games played is a better indicator).
Posts 1 - 22 of 22