First of all, Why? This wouldn't serve any real purpose, it would just be an election, and then you'd have nothing to argue about.
Second, this is literally the #2 way to start massive fights that end in a locked thread.
Third, You posted this with no ideas or rules or anything to back it up, so it's just kind of "Make it up as you go"

And that is why I don't support this idea at all.

I create a party known as the Anti-Troll Extremists (ATS)

ATS has an ideology on being that mods require power to ban . ATS also sees trolls as a disgrace to the game and must be remove before any harm is done.

You don't have to share the same idealoloyies as me but Trolls are a disgrace , just remember that

I nominate myself a leader

Edited 10/4/2015 13:43:41

like Onlythepie, I dont get the point of this, as I said earlier this is a good idea for a clan.

@Only The Pie and everyone else

Ordinary WL players have little to say in the change of the game. Being elected or having voting is a way that players feel hàppy and they feel like there contributing

Like clot , the future of parliment voting is disputed probably sooner or later

It works great for clans tho I agree

Edited 10/4/2015 13:47:06

@ OnlyThePie Well i think it is a good way to make bounds between players that want to form a union but are in different clans. And it could be a fun way to see peoples political opinions across the globe in a game we love. ;) And this is democracy, my friend, not the Soviet Union. The people will tell their ideas and make their own rules.

True it's not the Soviet Union where Fizzer dictates all.

About Clans , you can't join more than one. Having parties gamewide is a way of integrating people to others that to their views , they dislike. It's a great way for interlocking Clan relationships. At The moment WL has received recent turmoil by Troll attacks and bots.

@Kretoma
Well i think it is a good way to make bounds between players that want to form a union but are in different clans.
Then just run a game, this wont have any real value

And it could be a fun way to see peoples political opinions across the globe in a game we love.
Looking at the parties already created, there's little actual politics to this.

And this is democracy, my friend, not the Soviet Union. The people will tell their ideas and make their own rules.
Yes, I'm sure the creator of this game is going to listen to your democracy. Just because rules are created by the players does not mean they will be followed or be required to be followed

@ATalkingFan
Ordinary WL players have little to say in the change of the game. Being elected or having voting is a way that players feel hàppy and they feel like there contributing
Except they aren't contributing anything, because Fizzer is not required to listen to whatever they decide.

Like clot , the future of parliment voting is disputed probably sooner or later
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Have you ever found a game where the community is allowed to decide the rules and what happens? This isn't going to happen.

True it's not the Soviet Union where Fizzer dictates all.
It's more like a dictatorship. No matter what suggestions or "Rules" we make, its up to Fizzer whether to implement it or not

In summary: FIZZER WONT DO IT JUST BECAUSE YALL VOTE ON IT

What about asking Fizzer himself? I am sure he has not declared you as his spokesperson.

And this already has rear political value. Your opinion is it that people who own websites can decide everything about it. We think the community has something to say as well. It is the same with companies in the real world. ;)

Edited 10/4/2015 14:03:25

Reference "Have you ever found a game where the community is allowed to decide the rules and what happens?"

Even if he says "Oh sure, you guys can vote on stuff and I'll add it" He can always change his mind, he can always say no. What if you all decided "Hey, new rule, you're allowed to post porn and stuff wherever" (i know you wouldn't , just an example). There's no way that would fly, even if it got a 100% vote approval. It just doesn't work when you have a person in power you can't depose.

You did not get my point talking fan, I said that political parties/democracy could be an organization system that you can implement within Clans.

Some clans already tried this organization, but some also failed (not sure of this but I think one clan was "hijacked" because someone won the elections and with bad intentions became a dictator and removed any people against him, kinda funny actually).

Clan management needs to improve








Rioting in Fizzers actions causes banning. This is why WL updates are never nice except WL2.0

The current clan system

Not the leader

-Having a fancy icon and title

Leader

-Able to kick players out even himself
-Able to invite players
-Able to change player titles
-Able to change clan des
-All above

Maybe in the future fizzer will add custom privileges to clans to alllow clan members to have certain leader privileges. This works well for ranking and elections. But not in the dictator sense.

People will always rebel against dictators exect KJU. They always overthrow them.

It works and prevents dicxtators

Edited 10/4/2015 14:08:17

I don't understand what point you're trying to make Fan, it's pretty off-topic

Well, we are in the right forum for that. ;) And this is way better than posting disgusting pics or discussing about genocide. ^^

Just because it's the off-topic forum does not give you permission to go off-topic in a thread. "Off Topic" as the forum title simply means "Not about warlight"

You are that kind of person that gets emotionally hurt when they cannot prove their point, right? ;) And Talking Fan, that clan improvement think you talk about, is there a uservoice post for this?

Edited 10/4/2015 14:11:56

No. I get frustrated when people refuse to even see my side of the argument, but that's the most you can do.

There's no need to get personal about this.

No the point is that your argumentation smells pro capitalist. Never argument pro-capitalist with people under 30 years. ;)

Edited 10/4/2015 14:13:18

Wtf are you even talking about? I didn't say anything that had anything to do with capitalism! I was making a point about the uselessness of a Parliament in a computer game that is owned. You can't depose an owner without actual legal grounds.

Edited 10/4/2015 14:14:11

calm down Onlythepie, this was just a suggestion, no need to be angry (and I'm saying it ahah).