Since I dont use used voice , idk if there's a used voice section about clan (-_-)
Radical changes won't happen today or tommorow.moving away from politics , if you really want changed on a game that's owned , better get a billion lawyers to cover you to depose of the owner
I'm angry because he intentionally made it personal just to piss me off. Plus, I don't even understand what he's talking about with this capitalism crap.
This is why I'm quitting this game. Because threads like this and similar games are way too common.
Woah! Seriously OnlyPie , you don't have sufficient knowledge to cpfully understand Kertona but S/he didn't mean to emotionally rage you out. However you registered it as emotionally Hurting.
I too don't want to emotionally rage quit you but I onlyaqnoledge this to you
-Able to kick players out even himself -Able to invite players -Able to change player titles -Able to change clan des -All above
Maybe in the future fizzer will add custom privileges to clans to alllow clan members to have certain leader privileges. This works well for ranking and elections. But not in the dictator sense.
People will always rebel against dictators exect KJU. They always overthrow them.
It works and prevents dicxtators
This is seriously a problem. The clan system all around is underdeveloped. The system works well for smaller clan but larger clans such as VM or CORP need options link these. A better way a communication would be cool too. Not everybody is always playing on the Web so they won't always check the forums/mail. Sure chat games are an alternative but nobody really wants space on their pages to be filled with chat games.
Clans , Along with levels were Added in WL 2.0 , levels didn't need much development bit clans , well Fizzer opened a new gate for great potential there , but he never found 'the great potential' and left it undeveloped
I decided to quit about a month ago....You just continue to prove my point.
How did that work out ? Oh, you're still responding to a discussion that all the grown-ups are ignoring ? Well, i wish you better luck quiting next time ...
I actually like the basic idea but it could be improved like.. a lot. I would prefer to shut this thread down and create an other thread where you make a RPG form of this. It is a long time ago we have had RPG's (considerably in months) .
I suggest in the RPG version to call it "Parliament Dictatorship" where players can have their own political parties (max. 3 people in a party) and try to assassinate their political rivalies in order to win. The last party that stands wins. Also players should be given special chances/albities like casual RPG's.
Corruption in its finest would be pretty cool and in my opinion better than this unstructural thread where they all start to complain. What do you think Kretoma? Political corruption as RPG ?
How did that work out ? Oh, you're still responding to a discussion that all the grown-ups are ignoring ? Well, i wish you better luck quiting next time ...
I didn't bother explaining because of the level of maturity in this discussion, which you continue to show. I'm phasing out. I'm not joining any new multidays, but I'm finishing all my current ones, along with my term as Minister of the USSR. As such, i'm still free to post on the forums.
OnlyThePie, I actually agree with you that this idea isn't going to work. However, your attitude is pretty off putting. You can't criticize the maturity of others and than turn around and call everyone an idiot like you're superior.
We used to have all this politics stuff at the Falcons and I used to (mostly under suspicious circumstances in which everyone hated me) mysteriously win every month or so. The winning party got to have their candidate to be PM and their party would be allocated a certain number of seats. The losing parties would be given seats according to the percentage of votes they got. Participation in elections was less than 20%, so it wasn't very reflective of the entire clan, but it was good rp.
