<< Back to Ladder Forum   Search

Posts 51 - 70 of 78   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>   
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 20:29:33


Benjamin628 
Level 60
Report
@Fizzer - That claim is definitely invalid. But if say Donald Trump gets 33 votes and Hillary Clinton gets 10, who wins?

Donald Trump = 0%WR on 1v1 ladder
Hillary = 0% SR on 1v1 ladder
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 20:32:46

E Masterpierround
Level 57
Report
FOR
Master Bjarke: So in sum; I think it would be sweet with 0% SR
Ps: if it was up to me i'd have everything 0% SR.
Gnuffone: For those reason i believe every ladder should have 0% SR no luck cycle.
Mister Aqua: please make it 0% SR
Master Ryiro: i like the idea of using 0-16 luck straight round in ladders
Idibob: Take that luck out and it will become truly competitive
Windows 10: However, I would still prefer 0% SR.

AGAINST
Master of desaster: Me personally, i like the 1vs1 ladder as it is.
Anna: i personally would prefer the 1v1 ladder stay as it is.
Benjamin628: I think the 1v1 ladder should stay 0% WR.
Hades: Yeah I think keep the 1v1 ladder as is
AWESOMEGUY: However, I prefer the 1v1 ladder to stay as it is.
USA biches: I prefer the 0% WR for the 1v1 ladder.
Almosttricky: As far as the 16% luck, I am leaning to keeping it, but I don't have a strong opinion.
Hedja: Please keep strategic 1v1 as it is.
Beren Erchamion: The 1v1 ladder is perfect as it is.
Perrin3088: I felt the original strat 1v1 settings put the variables of war quite nicely into a strategic simulation.
Knyte: I like the 1v1 Ladder the way it is
Widzisz: I like WR more I think
Tenshi: Also 0% WR should be a better choice of luck here imo.
Peixoto: 1v1 Ladder - Keep the settings, but change the map to Modified Medium Earth.
Dead piggy: Luck makes the games rich and complex.
Master of the Dead :"""Luck makes the games rich and complex. Its not fair, and that doesnt matter, 1v1 ladder is about beauty not who is #1. Dont sacrifice the most regal and storied ladder on the altar of equality.""" - dead piggy
"""Me personally, i like the 1vs1 ladder as it is. Risk management should stay a part of a ladder imo. """ - MoD
+1 to both.
Verzehrer: 0% wr is totally good.
Master Atom: I like ladder the way it is,
Smileyleg: Count me in support for no changes to the 1v1 ladder.
Des: And that, with making it 0% luck is gonna make it not fun.
Veelvraat: I'm another one of those in favour of keeping the current 1v1 ladder.
Good Kid: 0% straight round makes things like this happen:
https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=9245384
It makes picking way less interesting.
FlyingDutchMan: As for me, i prefer 0 luck wr for the 1vs1 ladder.
Master Turtle: 0% WR for 1v1 ladder!!!! Keep it the same!
Pushover: Please don't change the 1v1 template.
Inquisitor: I prefer cyclic move order while keeping weighted random (WR).
Dr. Walter Ego: I write about only change the move order settings from Random to Cyclic! 0% WR and random pick order would be remained.

7 to 27 against SR by my count. I only took into account those who specifically stated their position, so I'm not included on here, even though I'm against SR.

Edited 9/26/2015 22:15:40
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 21:00:47


Deadman 
Level 64
Report
""So you ask players to vote for something. You get 8 pages of responses and then only use the first 2? Thats just BS.

The claim was that 90-95% of players were against 0% SR. I only had to read through two pages to refute the claim.""



Yes I was being dramatic. Others have done the math and you now have the exact count from that thread.
it's 7-27 or 10-33 or whatever. The point is still valid though. A significant number wanted it to stay the same.


So if you've made this decision because you think this is the best way forward for Warlight, then ok. But if the point of that thread was to see what the community thinks, I don't think the opinion is being considered.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 21:03:29


THE PLAGUE
Level 60
Report
but not the whole community commented on the thread so your %'s aren't accurate
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 21:07:46


Min34 
Level 63
Report
Nor is the whole community active on the forums, neither on the ladders. The whole community doesn`t even 100% know what SR is, or WR or the fact that ladders even excist.

I didn`t post either, I`m against this update though. Ofcourse there are also people who didn`t post and are in favor of this update, but as the most active players (and quite some good players as well) posted there I think it is safe to say the majority of the community would want to keep it.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 21:16:40


ChrisCMU 
Level 61
Report
I never changed from SR to WR. I just said i get why some want it and I would be fine if it goes that way. Personally, i applaud all these changes, though I have not looked at the 3v3 ladder (i heard maybe that template was messed up?), so dont hold me to it there. Still think we need a 3rd and probably 4th pick on 2v2 ladder though.

Edited 9/26/2015 21:17:07
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 21:22:05


Benjamin628 
Level 60
Report
@Chris Fizz fixed the template.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:22:40


THE PLAGUE
Level 60
Report
so what we need is a pole based on active ladder players .... that would be fair no?
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:29:22

E Masterpierround
Level 57
Report
I don't think that would be fair. One of the reasons for changing it was so new ladder players could easily become acclimated to it. If it were possible, in order to come up with an accurate estimate, you would need to poll all members and everyone lvl 40+ imo.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:29:44


master of desaster 
Level 66
Report
Nobody cares about fairness. Fizzer wants to make coin games more popular so he changes the 1vs1 ladder to a similar version of the coin game earth.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:42:38


THE PLAGUE
Level 60
Report
well i care about fairness ... nice to be different
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:46:39


master of desaster 
Level 66
Report
What i wanted to say is, that fairness doesn't matter. You can make polls or new forum threads but nothing will be changed trough it.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 22:57:05


THE PLAGUE
Level 60
Report
i understood i was just being pedantic sry
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 23:33:54

<SNinja> Leinad
Level 57
Report
what's the new map for 1v1?
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/26/2015 23:34:54


master of desaster 
Level 66
Report
Modified medium earth. Same as it was but east us and eaat russia have one terrority less
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/27/2015 00:29:35


Benjamin628 
Level 60
Report
Anyways, copied and pasted directly from wiki:

The 1 v 1 ladder is a ladder that uses the strategic 1 v 1 template. The goal of the 1 v 1 ladder is to provide the most fun settings possible for 1v1. Although this usually correlates with reducing the luck factor as much as possible, the goal is not to remove luck completely.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/27/2015 01:03:18


shyb
Level 59
Report
i won my first game with the new template in one turn. i still don't like it.

Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/27/2015 01:51:44

inquisitor
Level 56
Report
Let's have a poll on this. VOTE NOW!

Which one do you prefer in ladder games?
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=56069f9fe4b0148c68da6862

Ladder games concerned: 1v1 ladder, 2v2 ladder, 3v3 ladder

Choices available for each ladder (select one choice only)
1. Straight Round
2. Weighted Random
3. I don't know/mind

Each player can only vote once.
Both new players (who has recently joined or want to join ladder games) or old players are welcome.
Invite more people to participate in this poll. Bump this thread more. ;-)
The poll result will be published on 1 Oct 2015.

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/110747-u-prefer-straight-round-weighted-random
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/27/2015 02:15:59

Skilled
Level 56
Report
We need the original ladder back. The expansion is way too fast and there is no risk now.
Strategic 1v1 and 2v2 changes: 9/27/2015 08:34:39

paul
Level 63
Report
Sry about this change, hope i continue to play
RIP
Posts 51 - 70 of 78   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>