If you want to argue more, PM me. This thread ain't designed for this.

Thank you death.

Now STFU you two!!!

Says Tyrion "I support rape" Lannister.

The Lord,
Your more of a troll *cough* tranny *cough* than I am, and you really should shut up, considering I'm not the one derailing a thread.

How can I take anything seriously from a guy who loves rape? And your tranny jokes aren't helping you at all.

Both of you are awful but the Lord is worse.

It's good to know this,

but ain't too much you can do about.

I wouldn't worry how fucked up a society is, is is important not to be fucked up yourself.

Cheers! :P



There is always 1% of people who see the bigger picture around them :)

If I was a socialist, I would kill myself because the only way of making the poor richer is by making the rich richer, and if you make the rich poorer you will force the poor poorer. This is the vicious reality of socialism. The only way out of this is to make the richest fewer which is what communism does. This causes the hands of the entire economy to be reduced to the hands of few who usually turn out to be the rulers who become corrupt and destroy their wealth and thereby their people's wealth.
Such is the reality of socialism. Good day.

Long live the 1%, as they see the bigger picture, may they guide us 99% how they see fit, or let the 1% dispose of us 99% so a new, better humanity will arise.

No. The answer is not to let the 1% rule.
If the rich rule it will be an impediment for their correct judgement as they seek to protect their wealth.
I appreciate sarcasm but in this instance I must ignore it.
Rulers must be given guarantee of rulership until death. I am in favour of increasing the length of United Statesian presidential terms, as long as they have overall majority representation in the senate, until death do us part. That would secure the commitment of the person to the job in question without fear of impediment. George Bush and Richard Nixon (or whatever the damned guy's name is, I can't remember because I'm a Scotsman) would never have happened.

Uh, I meant the 1% who doesn't follow cultural mainstream and is very sceptical what media is saying.

Richard Nixon wasn't that bad.

(Comparatively to the last 3 presidents we've had)

I am in favour of increasing the length of United Statesian presidential terms, as long as they have overall majority representation in the senate, until death do us part.

The USA with a monarch is no USA at all. I'd rather strap a bomb to my chest then see a king in the White House.

Edited 9/5/2015 23:53:09

MGSB: wouldn't it be better to say, rebel against the hypothetical monarch than commit suicide?

The term PC is a bit useless. There are people who are jerks (who whine about people being PC when they can no longer get away with saying crap), and others who are overly sensitive about extremely trivial things that are completely beside the point. You never know which it is when someone complains about something being PC. Sometimes, people are even being a bit PC when calling something/someone PC.

Crap happens. It sucks, but learning to deal with it and with people who disagree with you is part of life. Being kind and considerate isn't PC, but don't be so sensitive on behalf of someone else (or yourself) that you shut down discussions that need to happen.

Edited 9/6/2015 01:28:10

Well the hypothetical is: commit suicide or have a monarch. If the US did suddenly have a monarch then rebellion would be the way to go, but the hypothetical is different.

If I was a socialist, I would kill myself

Enough read already. Don't go to Sweden.

Also, parliamentary kingdom best ruling system (really, I mean it, in today's politic world). The European countries (that still even have kings) have unfortunately reduced their kings to little more than diplomats.

Edited 9/6/2015 02:15:39

Sigh...

the only way of making the poor richer is by making the rich richer, and if you make the rich poorer you will force the poor poorer.

So you're saying if we take money from the poor and give it to the rich, money will magically appear in the hands of the poor?

Under your logic, there can never be any variance in the gap between rich and poor. Explain to me this logic please? How does one make the rich richer, where does the money come from?

Edited 9/6/2015 02:54:37

money is printed.

It is far from being that simple.
Your biggest problem would be inflation, which is already bad enough...