Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 03:11:50 |
BlacKnight
Level 62
Report
|
I think just keep it at abandon
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 03:12:23 |
Cata Cauda
Level 59
Report
|
Scorched earth is still the best solution....
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 03:16:24 |
l4v.r0v
Level 59
Report
|
@Platinum:
Yes. Scorched Earth == Good Kid == Purple Illusions == Idiot Savant and at least one more alt.
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 03:20:39 |
kavastroyer
Level 56
Report
|
I like Sephiroth's idea=== a "Scorched-Earth Card". "Abandon" is so 'everlasting' to one's ego.
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 03:23:34 |
BlacKnight
Level 62
Report
|
If it has to change I would pick scorched earth out of the options mentioned
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 05:45:45 |
[WL] Habsburg Australia!!
Level 37
Report
|
I like the idea of nuke card
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 07:08:04 |
GeniusJKlopp
Level 61
Report
|
Blockade priority card. The blockade should be Blockayed delay card.
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 07:51:41 |
Fleecemaster
Level 59
Report
|
TL;DR: Abbandon to Blockade Blockade to Fortify Perhaps a new card to reclaim that land/troops (reverse the blockade)
I think re-naming abbandon to blockade is nice, I tend to call the abbandon "blockade" in natural situations anyway, like "blockade Hawii" when actually I mean abbandon but it feels right to say blockade (that's the correct semantic imo).
(irl blockades involed placing large forces in a stationary manner/local patrols/minefields so it makes more sense)
I like the idea of fortify for blockade, the point being you're using your men there to build fortifications, and then set them as a stationary garrison. Also the extra turn makes sense too, and attacking a fortification makes sense that it would cause serious damage before the fortification was up.
If you feel like you should be able to therefore reclaim those men, how about a new card for "reclaim troops" or something, that lets you undo the blockade/fortify? For that the game would need a way to show you still "own" that territory though.
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 08:16:21 |
GeniusJKlopp
Level 61
Report
|
???
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 08:20:23 |
Fleecemaster
Level 59
Report
|
I think Pink had a crisis of conscience :P
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 08:22:13 |
GeniusJKlopp
Level 61
Report
|
Lol.
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 08:37:50 |
ℳℛᐤƬrαńɋℰ✕
Level 59
Report
|
First you should consider the Theme of game. "Land Mine" = blockage.v.abandon, Bomb card, Airlift, Spy, Diplomacy, sanction.
Land Mine could fit into category as general theme sounds like modern-warfare, but it implies it is hidden-unknown and may confuse new player who do not read Wiki. Land mine is too clear in that Trap part.
I would prefer Chris suggestion: "Priority Blockade Delayed Blockade"
or Sephiroth´s Scorched-Earth Card
I remember I always had problems recalling or taking for granted that Blockage also abandons the territory. I thought it keeps the territory - just makes armies immobile/stand still. Abandon seemed clear on that part, but the factor of army-multiplication did not derive from the name.
Scorched-Earth would be a good name and would fit the description as it happens only if enemy troops do not reach or intervene. Fortification as mentioned above implies you still own it.
Bottom-Line Conclusion In military terms I have always drawn connection between Blockage-Ambush, Abandon-Burning Bridges/Scorched-Earth. As both are clear on the part before attack/after attack and never expect one to own the territory or to keep it!
Edited 9/1/2015 08:40:36
|
Rename Abandon Card?: 9/1/2015 11:17:41 |
Ragnarok
Level 66
Report
|
Abandon ---> Sacrifice or Immolation
Edited 9/1/2015 11:18:40
|