@Zeph I don't like the idea of free public tournaments, those should be exculsive to live streams. Other than that I like all of your things, some should be for non-members though like slot selection and shift clicking territories for fasting scenario making

well. one thin about the Leveled membership is that some ppl who don't really want to pay $30 might be willing to pay $15.

also if you gave every member access to make public tournaments the open tournaments page would be Hectic again. but if you only gave it to like Gold or higher members there wouldn't be as many 600 players crappy tournaments.

oh and that Youtube thing +1

Edited 8/5/2015 02:26:45

Last ten games -1

Last 10 games -1 as well

- Userscripts advertised

- Custom theme for forums/dashboard

- Custom text in game chat and army count on territories

- Extended blacklist features

- Multiple friend lists

- Increase speed for history "Play" feature (maybe give this to everyone)

Edited 8/5/2015 02:37:10

How about the Outcome of the last 10 games? and what they were.

Ex:1v1v1v1v1v1v11v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v11v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1 "Middle East Diplo" Surrendered
1v20 "Russia Versus the World" Won
1v1 "1v1 Auto Game" Won
1v1 "MightySpeck Vs. 'player name' (Ladder Game) Lost

- Multiple friend lists

+1.

@Zeph I don't like the idea of free public tournaments, those should be exculsive to live streams.

I think it would be interesting, since basically at any time I only see one public tournament up and it takes ages to fill. This would be specially amazing for RT tournaments. Having to invite is a hassle.

some should be for non-members though like slot selection and shift clicking territories for fasting scenario making

Agreed to the shift click part, not much for the slot though. If you're into diplomacies you'd see that allowing people to just pick their slots would likely end in important players booted. Members are way less likely to get booted (after all, they are playing a game they love to the point of paying money for better enjoyment).

Last ten games -1

Last 10 games -1 as well

Why not? o.O

Nice solution Speck. It should be like the "games played with this player" feature.

Zeph, I think it is a + 1 with Specks solution. Players need their privacy.

Edited 8/5/2015 02:47:08

I don't like Custom Membership icons. I feel that too many ppl would just have the same one anyway. and it wouldn't give whoever made that icon feel special also that would take a lot of space.

well i guess he would be proud he made a cool icon but People wouldn't be like "Look at that Icon!" they would be like "that one again?"

Edited 8/5/2015 02:47:58

Anyone can see any match through the link, and in mighty's method people can still know what you play and such. Either way is fine by me, I'm indifferent about this.

As for custom icons, sounds fun, but that might be a hassle to make/come up with. >_<

Edited 8/5/2015 02:48:59

@Speck maybe you can choose one of like 50 availible icons? Kind of like North Korean men can have one of 8 haircuts :P. Custom icons might take up too much space is probably correct.

Yeah that sounds good.

I can't think of any more ideas. If all of my ideas were implanted I would definitely buy membership. We should have a poll where you can vote on all of the suggestions made thus far.

Edited 8/5/2015 02:54:34

@Speck maybe you can choose one of like 50 availible icons? Kind of like North Korean men can have one of 8 haircuts :P. Custom icons might take up too much space is probably correct.

Sounds great.

Some awesome ideas here, Fizzer and Mercer should try to do some :3

I bet I will get some support from Knyte on this one:

- More flexible APIs, better access and more functions to them.

Separate forum would be cool.

I don't like the idea of stealing a name, but it would be cool if you could basically 'retire' your name. Basically no user could make a name that has the same characters in it (in order, not case sensitive). So like Chriscmu1042 would not be allowed. Or ihatechriscmu. You get the picture.

I will think some more on this for sure, thanks for asking Mercer.

I bet that a membership forum would just bring more Trolls. (but more money for fizzer too)

Wait but then the normal forums would have less trolls since all the trolls would want to troll on the Member forum ... #Solution.

it would be the troll forum and the trolls wouldn't even know it!

Edited 8/5/2015 03:14:36

maybe more single player missions like the ones promised 100 years ago

^ Fizzer already said he wants to do that for everyone.

Make your own custom color (primary and secondary) (Red Blue Green 0-255 thing)

+1 or even just access to the Reserve colors.

How about Execlusive Username with Membership?
If a user wanted GoldFinger as their username then the game would move all other users that have the username of GoldFinger to an alternate username, example GoldFinger2. Now when GoldFinger2 logs in next, he will be prompted to keep his new username or pick a new one for free.

I can see that easily being abused by trolls.

Execlusive Forums for Members only?

Do you men you'd make all the forums exclusive to members or create a new section of the forums exclusively for members? Making all the forums members only would lead to dead forums. But if you mean making a new section of the forums that will be exclusive to members, I don't see why members would post into their exclusive forum when there would be less people to respond to it.

See the last 10 past games of any WarLight player?

Promote Ladders on the promoted game section?

Third Type of Sound Notifications - Highly Critical Sounds?

Sure, why not? However, these changes are so minor that it wouldn't make anyone pay.

And here are my ideas:
• Removing the option in the open seats pre-requests that says "prevent WarLight members from joining".
• Give map makers the option to only allow members to make games on their map.
• Being able to write a longer bio on their profile.

Edited 8/5/2015 03:36:30

what do you think of what we said ^