It wont die cause it's so damn funny.

France and Britain are stronger than Israel. Israel is currently stronger than Iran. If sanctions, and room for economic and military development are left for Iran to decide, Iran would easily overtake all of them, in good time.

What Tupac says is true. North Korea are far more nuts than Iran, and you don't see them launching nukes. Even Kim Jong Un is smart enough to know that firing nukes is a stupid decision.

USA, and a few other countries think that they are the bosses of the world, and get to police which countries have nukes and which countries don't. That is ridiculous. Trust me, it takes one overly-mental leader to fire these weapons that the countries have at their disposal, and then the whole policing thing makes no sense, as a country descends into chaos. Iran is only getting so bitter, because they are sanctioned, prohibited from doing things USA thinks.

Note - I think all nukes should be destroyed and no country should have them.

Edited 7/13/2015 17:32:15

Also the second Iraq war says something very dangerous about the US and nukes, either the US will make false claims to invade nations and use them for their resources. Or the US will invade nuclear armed (or nations they believe to be nuclear armed) without a moments thought about possible nuclear attacks.
Either way it's pretty terrifying. Although since there was no US invasion of North Korea it seems the resources scenario is most likely. Still pretty terrifying.

I thought we already decided on the whole Iran nuke issue thing, but we still have people crying "U.S is such a bully why don't you let poor little Iran have some nukes too?"

So let's restate a few things. Nobody should have nukes, the fact that U.S,Russia,China, and the others already have them is bad enough. The last thing we need is for more countries to build additional nukes. I don't care if freaking Switzerland wants them, no country should have them.

In an ideal world the current nuclear powers would give up there nuclear weapons. However, it's not an ideal world. Nine countries have nukes, and aren't likely to give them up. We can at-least stop additional countries from building doomsday weapons though.

There was only one nation that ever dismantled it's nuclear weapons and that was south Africa. And they were run by Mandela at the time. Unless mother Teresa or Martin Luther King take over countries nuclear dis armament is far off.

Tupac, don't forget Ukraine had a stockpile after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which they either destroyed, or sent to Russia.

There are also some anti-nuke movements in the UK. I find it funny that the parties in the UK that disagree with, and would like to stop the continuation of Trident (The UK Nuclear Programme) are:

Scottish National Party
Scottish Green Party
Scottish Socialist Party
Scottish Solidarity Party

Yeeeeahhh...

Edited 7/13/2015 19:00:33

So depressing. In reality, the gays should have made a photo of themselves getting shot down like the Japs because they're both Enemies of America. Would have given bonus points if they'd used real bullets for the photo hehe.

There was only one nation that ever dismantled it's nuclear weapons and that was south Africa. And they were run by Mandela at the time. Unless mother Teresa or Martin Luther King take over countries nuclear dis armament is far off.

Actually, Ukraine did too (I'm pretty sure.). And now Ukraine is paying the price: their being invaded by Russia, who probably would not have invaded a nuclear armed ukraine.

Also, saying a country run by MLK or Mother Teresa wouldn't have nukes is idiotic.

So depressing. In reality, the gays should have made a photo of themselves getting shot down like the Japs because they're both Enemies of America. Would have given bonus points if they'd used real bullets for the photo hehe.

I cannot begin to say how much I hate this douchebag sicko. ^

Tyrion you do realize he's being ironic, right?

Or are you ironically pretending to not understand that he's being ironic?

Wew

"Britain"

Classic. The angry Scot is angry at being forgotten. Go get 'em tiger!

P.S. I'm a Scot too... Don't kill me, please.

Edit: This thread topic is a non-issue.

Edited 7/15/2015 17:33:13

Also the second Iraq war says something very dangerous about the US and nukes, either the US will make false claims to invade nations and use them for their resources. Or the US will invade nuclear armed (or nations they believe to be nuclear armed) without a moments thought about possible nuclear attacks.
Either way it's pretty terrifying. Although since there was no US invasion of North Korea it seems the resources scenario is most likely. Still pretty terrifying.

The reason we haven't invaded NK is because China protects them. Same reason JFK didn't attack Cuba in the Bay of Pigs. He didn't want to risk a nuclear war with Russia over Cuba.

Tyrion you do realize he's being ironic, right?

Or are you ironically pretending to not understand that he's being ironic?

Or maybe I only posted something so that someone would post about the irony of my puposeful misunderstand of his irony, thus creating more irony.

Or maybe.. Just maybe.. No nukes at all!!!

Countries agree on a treaty called "MAD" Mutually Assured Destruction. Where if a war is declared the countries would destroy each other up.

I find this sad that countries agree to this, Instead of putting them-away altogether.. :/

"Lets war Iran cause they are terroists" US Government
What they really mean is "Lets war Iran cause they have oil"

Edited 7/16/2015 19:18:31

Bush outlined that he believed that Iraq had nuclear weapons. Either he was lying or he believed he was risking a nuclear war.

I thought he said "WMDs" not specifically nukes. WMDs can be chemical or biological, too, and those are much more widespread (Syria, for example, has chemical WMDs).

Fuck the Syrian regime, btw.

If I remember correctly he alluded to nuclear reactors and even showed "evidence" of them.

He never showed evidence of nuclear weapons. He only went in to get the chemical weapons (which we never found). Honestly, those weapons are probably in Syria right now killing those civilians rather than just sitting around unused by Saddam. Another foriegn policy success story of the US.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCUQFjACahUKEwjOgvWd1-LGAhWJf5IKHZY-BYY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsarchive.gwu.edu%2FNSAEBB%2FNSAEBB80%2F&rct=j&q=bush%20iraq%20nuclear%20program&ei=KTqpVY7KJIn_yQSW_ZSwCA&usg=AFQjCNE9_7AzVGmZHfJru-ijsWFbhWV3zA