Note: this post was written before I saw page 3. (Therefore everything refers to stuff on page 2.)
@ChrisCMU I never talked about you or your ladder performance. In fact it took me a while to figure out why you brought it up. {Quote, as the posts is on pre. page.}
"I guess you are biased if you are low on the ladder too. (bad settings). And if you are not ranked (not worth playing.) etc. Yes he [Apollo] is biased, but thinking that anyone is not biased is just stupid. We are all biased."
The first "you" refereed to the group of warlight players. Not your person. (In hindsight I could have written I guess a player is biased if he ...") Anyway my point was that you can't find a player that is not biased. And that a biased player has as much right to voice his opinion as anyone else.
@Sephiroth "In conclusion, "more luck requires more skill" in not an open debate, it is just a false statement - regarding the 3v2 vs 4v2 variety, I like it myself, but I think it should be implemented without adding other luck elements "
1. If you quote someone please make sure it is the exact quote. I wrote "I like some luck in my games, because it takes more skill! There is ofc a limit to how much luck should be involved." which don't mean the same thing. 2. It clearly is an open debate. 3. You find that a statement i didn't make is false....
@MotD Completely agree with everything :)
@Gnuff "Today i will avoid to speak about 16% WR" Wise decision. Keeps you away from the blaze.
@Braak Interesting proposal. Looks like you tried to find a balance. Hopefully your proposal becomes the next discussion in this thread. (That would bring it back on "fixing" the 2v2 ladder)
