@bone thanks for the laugh and ego-stroking.

@tommy clan consolidation is how good a clan is with its members. Inter-clan communications is how good it is as far as its clan Forum and relations with other clans. Organization is how good its leadership system is, as well as how members can advance. Leadership-Membership is how good the Leadership is as well as how good the members are. Forum reputation is self-explanatory.

EDIT: @Lolowut i hope you picked up on the wordplay i used.

I'm encouraging people rank less talked about clans, to give us light on the so many ignored 10-30 player clans. Rating bigger and more well known clans is fine though.

Edited 3/29/2015 23:50:46

youre welcome

oh, changing it to
Royal Falcons - 5/10
Forum Rep. - 0/2
Clan Cons. - 2/2
I-C Comm. - 0/2
Organization - 2/2
Lead./Memb. - 1/2

also how the flying fruitcake are we ninth on the clan ladder?

Lol it wasen't even Bane....

It was Shyb you dolts

Tom you are ninth because you have 90 something members

which is the same as lost wolves (12th)

It's because we have a level 61 member:

https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=6834905062

and?
one member doesn't put you up a shitload of places

It does. You should try it.

At least Lawlz made an attempt to rank them:

Top tier:
WM
WG
Apex
Ahol
{Rp}

Mid tier:
Warlighters
LEA
M'Hunters
French Community
[NL]
{101st}
Sninja
Vitrix Mortalis

Low tier:
MSF
Royal Falcons
After Dark
Lost Wolves
{Olympus}<-- After dark 2
{CORP}
Poon Squad

Trouble is if this is by skill he messed a few things up. GG, Lynx, [20], Master all overlooked...perhaps he was just listing some in each tier. If so, {rp} is not a top tier clan (skill wise). Many in the mid tier are not on that skill level of Warlighters and French on there.

Anyway, too bad another worthwhile discussion was derailed by Thomas.

Give a reason why MSF is the low tier?

vitrix mortalis is experienced

vitrix mortalis is experienced

Well, because they are not at all competitive. I'm just going based on skill. There are clans like LEA that are run well IMO, but would still be lower tier skill wise.

At any rate, the original question was who is liked/not. Has nothing to do with skill there. A poll is probably better for that. Something that you rate each clan whether you like/dislike them.

Edited 3/30/2015 20:51:33

fair enough. MSF is a peoples' clan, not a barbarian dick waving clan.

Strangely, 1v1 skill does not equate to social status sometimes.

{rp} is not a top tier clan (skill wise).

Something which is never considered is also how much a clan entertain their members, which is the main objective of a clan, skill is not everything, some clans are way better into making great scenarios/game templates or map making ( {rp} has good map makers such as Dameon who made the most famous game of thrones map, after_dark has zxct who made the current best rated map, etc), and this is as valuable as a clan being "skill wise".

Rating clans is not really possible or many factors should be considered.

Edited 3/30/2015 21:06:13

Thing is, Chris, I'm ranking based off PR not skill. Who is the most respected, decently respected, and least since that is what OP was asking for.

Well, you can rate clans in two ways. By skill (good/bad), or by approval (like/dislike). Just because a clan does not get high marks for skill does not make them a bad clan. Their purpose may not be competitive at all. But if they are neither skilled nor liked, then that is another story.

Take a person in life. You better either be skilled (athletic, smart, whatever measure of skill) or well liked (funny, empathetic, well connected, etc). Otherwise, I don't think you will get very far. A clan with neither skill nor reputation does not have much going for it.